Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets’ perceptions of fitness standards

References

• Austin, D. E. J., & Jackson, M. (2019). Benevolent and hostile sexism differentially predicted by facets of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 139(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C. (2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and internalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9707-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, D., & Zeichner, A. (2016). Testing a dual process model of gender-based violence: A laboratory examination. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J. (2018). Investigating right wing authoritarianism with a very short authoritarianism scale. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.835
   Google Scholar
• Boldry, J., Wood, W., & Kashy, D. A. (2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, A. N., & Wojda, M. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism, and prejudice toward women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, A. N., Zabel, K. L., & Miller, D. E. (2013). Personality, authoritarianism, social dominance, and ambivalent sexism: A mediational model. Individual Differences Research, 11(2), 70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, L. J., Greaves, L. M., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Sexuality and sexism: Differences in ambivalent sexism across gender and sexual identity. Personality and Individual Differences, 148(1), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.023
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., & Sandhoff, M. (2017). Just a girl in the army: U.S. Iraq war veterans negotiating femininity in a culture of masculinity. Armed Forces and Society, 43(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16682045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, J. J., & Samuels, S. M. (2021). I am a warrior: An analysis of the military masculine-warrior narrative among U.S. Air Force Officer candidates. Armed Forces & Society, 47(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20931561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, J. J., Samuels, S. M., Adkins, D. J., Clinard, M. E., & Koveleskie, A. J. (2013). Gender bias and pluralistic ignorance in perceptions of fitness assessments. Military Psychology, 25(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, Lee, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right‐wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N., & Boeckmann, R. (2007). Beliefs about gender discrimination in the workplace in the context of affirmative action: Effects of gender and ambivalent attitudes in an Australian sample. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9226-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2012). Values, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and ambivalent attitudes toward women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(10), 2479–2504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00950.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2017). Prejudices in cultural contexts: Shared stereotypes (gender, age) versus variable stereotypes (race, ethnicity, religion). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56(5–6), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9161-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 33, 115–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80005-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. F., Blacksmith, N., & Coats, M. R. (2018). The science of teams in the military: Contributions from over 60 years of research. The American Psychologist, 73(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, B. M., & Shaffer, B. A. (2005). Authoritarianism and sociopolitical attitudes in response to threats of terror. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.2.623-630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T., & Jylhä, K. M. (2018). What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism? Revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 122(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Hideg, I., & Ferris, D. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 706–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, R. (2010). Doing hegemony: Military, men, and constructing a hegemonic masculinity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 18(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1802.179
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015). How careless responding and acquiescence response bias can influence construct dimensionality: The case of job satisfaction. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 512–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115571894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasumovic, M. M., & Kuznekoff, J. H. (2015). Insights into sexism: Male status and performance moderates female-directed hostile and amicable behaviour. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0131613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J. H., Milavec, B. L., Rohall, D. E., Ender, M. G., & Matthews, M. D. (2016). Predictors of support for women in military roles: Military status, gender, and political ideology. Military Psychology, 28(6), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. G. (2015). The importance of understanding military culture. Academic Psychiatry, 39(4), 416–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0285-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosso, C., Briante, G., Aiello, A., & Russo, S. (2013). The role of legitimizing ideologies as predictors of ambivalent sexism in young people: Evidence from Italy and the USA. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0172-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, A. A. M., Charbonneau, D., & Boies, K. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in a Canadian military sample. Military Psychology, 19(4), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600701548072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2016). Fall report of the auditor general of Canada. https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201611_05_e_41834.html
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J. (2020). “This is a Man’s job”: Challenging the masculine “Warrior culture” at the U.S. air force academy. Armed Forces and Society, 46(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X18806524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Cidam, A., Stewart, E. L., Bou Zeinedinne, F., Aranda, M., Aiello, M., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Cohrs, C., Durrheim, K., Eicher, V., Foels, R., Górska, P., Lee, I., Licata, L., Liu, J. H., Liu, J. H., Meyer, I., Morselli, D., … Henkel, K. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radke, H. R. M., Hornsey, M. J., Sibley, C. G., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). Negotiating the hierarchy: Social dominance orientation among women is associated with the endorsement of benevolent sexism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, K., & Molloy, S. (2020). An examination of emerging adult military men: Masculinity and U.S. military climate. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 21(4), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000303
   Google Scholar
• Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollero, C., Glick, P., & Tartaglia, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Scoppio, G., Otis, N., & Yan, Y. L. (2018). Looking at recruiting and selection for the Canadian military colleges through the lens of gender-based analysis plus. Res Militaris, 8(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Scoppio, G., Otis, N., Yan, T. L., & Hogenkamp, S. (2020). Experiences of officer cadets in Canadian military colleges and civilian universities: A gender perspective. Armed Forces & Society 48(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20905121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, D. M., Kuhl, D., & Westwood, M. J. (2017). Abject masculinity and the military: Articulating a fulcrum of struggle and change. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000114
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Overall, N. C. (2011). A dual process motivational model of ambivalent sexism and gender differences in romantic partner preferences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311401838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Perry, R. (2010). An opposing process model of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9705–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uğurlu, N. S., & Özdemir, F. (2017). Predicting attitudes toward the masculine structure of the military with Turkish identification and ambivalent sexism. Sex Roles, 76(7–8), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0676-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, J. P., Viskari, J., Kyröläinen, H., & Santtila, M. (2016). Perceptions and attitudes of female soldiers toward physical performance and fitness standards in soldiers. Military Medicine, 181(10), 1218–1223. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail, K. E., III, & Motyl, M. (2010). Support for diplomacy: Peacemaking and militarism as a unidimensional correlate of social, environmental, and political attitudes. Peace and Conflict, 16(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910903486813
   Google Scholar
• Wood, V. M., & Charbonneau, D. (2018). Gender, self-efficacy, and warrior identification in Canadian army personnel. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(7), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1301812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P. S., Grant, C. C., du Toit, P. J., & Fletcher, L. (2017). Effect of mixed basic military training on the physical fitness of male and female soldiers. Military Medicine, 182(7), e1771–e1779. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L. M., & Nauta, M. M. (2013). Sexism as a predictor of attitudes toward women in the military and in combat. Military Psychology, 25(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar