- Hames I. Peer review at the beginning of the 21st century. Sci Ed. (1)2014;1:4–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.4.
- Fox CW, Albert AYK, Vines TH. Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017;2:3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x.
- Albert AYK, Gow JL, Cobra A, Vines TH. Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0022-7.
- Bro T, Hammarfelt B. Shared burden is always lighter—peer-review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010-2020. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021; published online ahead of print. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15033.
- National Science Board, National Science Foundation. Publications Output: U.S. and International Comparisons. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022 [NSB-2021-4]. 2021. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20214/
- Breuning M, Backstrom J, Brannon J, Gross BI, Widmeier M. Reviewer fatigue? Why scholars decline to review their peers’ work. APSC. 2015;48(04):595–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515000827.
- Willis M. Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses. Learned Pub. 2016;29(1):5–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1006.
- Tite L, Schroter S. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. J Epidemiology Com Health. 2007;61(1):9–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.049817.
- Donovan EE, Mackert M, Lindstadt CJ, Harrison MA. What motivates health communication’s peer reviewers to review? A survey of our scholarly community. Health Comm. 2020;35(9):1056–1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1762970.
- Clarivate. Editors’ guide to finding peer reviewers. May 10, 2018. https://clarivate.com/blog/editors-guide-to-finding-peer-reviewers/.
- Zaharie MA, Osoian CL. Peer review motivation frames: a qualitative approach. Eur Manag J. 2016;34(1):69–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.004.
- Brainard J. The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? ScienceInsider. 2021. https://www.science.org/content/article/450-question-should-journals-pay-peer-reviewers.
- Derraik JGB. The principles of fair allocation of peer-review: how much should a researcher be expected to contribute? Sci Engin Ethics. 2015;21(4):825–828. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9584-2.
- Thompson GD, Aradhyula SV, Frisvold G, Tronstad R. Does paying referees expedite reviews? Results of a natural experiment. South Econ J. 2010;76(3):678–692. doi:https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.678.
- Oransky I, Marcus A. Meet the world’s top peer reviewer. STAT. 2016. https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/23/meet-the-worlds-top-peer-reviewer/.
The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal’s perspective
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.