- Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP. Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(3):520–530. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.11.017.
- Peprah K, Spry C. Pulsed Electron Avalanche Knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade Versus Traditional Electrocautery for Surgery: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019.
- Schlosshauer T, Kiehlmann M, Riener MO, Sader R, Rieger UM. Comparative analysis on the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade) vs conventional electrosurgery in post-bariatric abdominoplasty: a retrospective randomised clinical study. Int Wound J. 2019;16(6):1494–1502. doi:10.1111/iwj.13221.
- Piazzolla A, Bizzoca D, Solarino G, Parato C, Moretti B. Plasma technology reduces blood loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Global Spine J. 2021;11(6):874–880. doi:10.1177/2192568220928344.
- Loh SA, Carlson GA, Chang EI, Huang E, Palanker D, Gurtner GC. Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a scalpel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1849–1859.
- Lee E, Tong JY, Pasick LJ, et al. Complications associated with PlasmaBlade TnA during tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy from 2010 to 2020: a MAUDE study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(1):102826. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102826.
- BioSpace. PEAK Surgical, Inc. announces first use of PEAK PlasmaBladeTM in Europe. Published June 11, 2009. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/peak-surgical-inc-announces-first-use-of-peak-plasmablade-tm-in-europe-/.
- Medtronic. Manual library. Accessed August 29, 2021. https://manuals.medtronic.com/manuals/main/en_US/manual/index.
- MAUDE adverse event report: Medtronic Advanced Energy LLC PlasmaBlade tissue dissection device. Accessed September 6, 2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/Detail.CFM?MDRFOI__ID=2822353&pc=GEI.
- MAUDE—Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. Accessed September 19, 2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/results.cfm.
- Yardley IE, Donaldson LJ. Surgical fires, a clear and present danger. Surgeon. 2010;8(2):87–92. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.01.005.
- Yamasaki A, Bhattacharyya N. Rare electrosurgical complications in tonsillectomy: analysis of national adverse event reporting. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(5):1138–1143. doi:10.1002/lary.28181.
- Paniccia A, Rozner M, Jones EL, et al. Electromagnetic interference caused by common surgical energy-based devices on an implanted cardiac defibrillator. Am J Surg. 2014;208(6):932–936. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.011.
- Lin Y, Melby DP, Krishnan B, Adabag S, Tholakanahalli V, Li JM. Frequency of pacemaker malfunction associated with monopolar electrosurgery during pulse generator replacement or upgrade surgery. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49(2):205–209. doi:10.1007/s10840-017-0241-y.
- St. Jude Medical. Considerations when using electrocautery in patients implanted with older generation St. Jude Medical Pacemakers. January 29, 2014. Accessed August 29, 2021. https://www.cardiovascular.abbott/content/dam/bss/divisionalsites/cv/pdf/reports/stjude-pacemaker-notice-012914.pdf.
- Smith LP, Roy S. Fire/burn risk with electrosurgical devices and endoscopy fiberoptic cables. Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29(3):171–176. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.05.006.
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
The peer-reviewed journal of Baylor Scott & White Health
Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 5