Publication Cover
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
The peer-reviewed journal of Baylor Scott & White Health
Volume 36, 2023 - Issue 4
159
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research: Cardiology

Outcomes of surgical Impella placement in acute cardiogenic shock

, MDORCID Icon, , MSN, , MD, , MD, , MD & , MD
Pages 415-421 | Received 11 Jan 2023, Accepted 13 Apr 2023, Published online: 08 May 2023

  • Chung JS, Emerson D, Ramzy D, et al. A new paradigm in mechanical circulatory support: 100-patient experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(5):1370–1377. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.041.
  • Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, et al. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(14):1407–1415. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958.
  • Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, et al. Thirty-year trends (1975–2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population based perspective. Circulation. 2009;119(9):1211–1219. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947.
  • Van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(16):e232–e268. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525.
  • Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunziker PR, et al. Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):618–626. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00005.
  • Shah RU, de Lemos JA, Wang TY, et al. Post-hospital outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: findings from the NCDR. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(7):739–747. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.048.
  • Samuels LE, Kaufman MS, Thomas MP, et al. Pharmacological criteria for ventricular assist device insertion following postcardiotomy shock: experience with the Abiomed BVS system. J Card Surg. 1999;14(4):288–293. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.1999.tb00996.x.
  • Valente S, Lazzeri C, Vecchio S, et al. Predictors of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock. Int J Cardiol. 2007;114(2):176–182. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.01.024.
  • Prondzinsky R, Lemm H, Swyter M, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):152–160. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b78671.
  • Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1287–1296. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1208410.
  • Ramzy D, Soltesz E, Anderson M. New surgical circulatory support system outcomes. Asaio J. 2020;66(7):746–752. doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000001194.
  • Ramzy D, Anderson M, Batsides G, et al. Early outcomes of the first 200 US patients treated with Impella 5.5: a novel temporary left ventricular assist device. Innovations (Phila). 2021;16(4):365–372. doi:10.1177/15569845211013329.
  • Nersesian G, Tschope C, Spillman F, et al. Prediction of survival of patients in cardiogenic shock treated by surgically implanted Impella 5+ short-term left ventricular assist device. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020;31(4):475–482. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivaa150.
  • Pahuja M, Hernandez-Montfort J, Whitehead EH, Kawabori M, Kapur NK. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022;19(1):1–10. doi:10.1080/17434440.2022.2015323.
  • Basir MB, Schreiber TL, Grines CL, et al. Effect of early initiation of mechanical circulatory support on survival in cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(6):845–851. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.037.
  • Zubarevich A, Rad AA, Szczechowicz M, et al. Early experience with the Impella pump: single center registry. Artif Organs. 2022;0:1–6.
  • Sugimura Y, Katahira S, Immohr MB, et al. Initial experience covering 50 consecutive cases of large Impella implantation at a single heart centre. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(6):5168–5177. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13594.
  • Bashline MJ, Rhinehart Z, Kola O, et al. Impella 5.0 is associated with a reduction in vasoactive support and improves hemodynamics in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience. Int J Artif Organs. 2022;45(5):462–469. doi:10.1177/03913988221083993.
  • Hall SA, Uriel N, Carey SA, et al. Use of a percutaneous temporary circulatory support device as a bridge to decision during acute decompensation of advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(1):100–106. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2017.09.020.
  • Lima B, Kale P, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, et al. Effectiveness and safety of the Impella 5.0 as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or durable left ventricular assist device. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(10):1622–1628. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.038.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.