Content and structure of Swedish animal welfare legislation and private standards for dairy cattle

References

• Bokkers, E. A. M., de Vries, M., Antonissen, I. & de Boer, I. J. M. (2012) Inter- and intra-observer reliability of experienced and inexperienced observers for the qualitative behaviour assessment in dairy cattle. Animal Welfare, 21, 307–318. doi: 10.7120/09627286.21.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA (2009) Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. EFSA Journal, 1143, 1–284.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (2012a) Scientific opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of dairy cows. EFSA Journal, 10(1), 1–81.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (2012b) Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal, 10(6), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliment, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the European Union Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2012–2015, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare (Brussels: European Commission). Special Eurobarameter 442.
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsen, V. (2013) Animal welfare in Switzerland – Constitutional aim, social commitment, and a major challenge. Global Journal of Animal Law, 1, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultgren, J. (2009) Animal welfare risk assessment and management from a national perspective. In F. J. M. Smulders & B. Algers (eds.) Welfare of Production Animals: Assessment and Management of Risks (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers), pp. 461–482.
   Google Scholar
• Jordbruksverket (2013) Vägledning för kontrollmyndigheter m.fl. - Bilaga Nötkreatur. Fastställd 4 juni 2013 [ Swedish Board of Agriculture, Guidelines for Official Control Authorities and Others – Appendix Cattle. Determined 4 June 2013] (Jönköping: Jordbruksverket).
   Google Scholar
• Keeling, L., Evans, A., Forkman, B. & Kjaernes, U. (2013)Welfare quality® principles and criteria. In H. J. Blokhuis, M. Miele, I. Veissier & B. Jones (eds.) Improving Farm Animal Welfare – Science and Society Working Togheter: The Welfare Quality Approach (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers), pp. 91–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kielland, C., Boe, K. E., Zanella, A. J. & Osteras, O. (2010) Risk factors for skin lesions on the necks of Norwegian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 3979–3989. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidfors, L., Berg, C. & Algers, B. (2005) Integration of natural behavior in housing systems. Ambio, 34, 325–330. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark, F., Berg, C. & Röcklinsberg, H. (2013) ‘Unnecessary suffering’ as a concept in animal welfare legislation and standards. In H. Röcklinsberg & P. Sandin (eds.) The Ethics of Consumption – The Citizen, the Market and the Law (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers), pp. 114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lundmark, F., Berg, C., Schmid, O., Behdadi, D. & Röcklinsberg, H. (2014) Intentions and values in animal welfare legislation and standards. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 6, 991–1017. doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9512-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark, F., Berg, C., Wahlberg, B. & Röcklinsberg, H. (2015) ‘One animal is no animal’ – Consequences of measuring animal welfare at herd level. In E. D. Dumitras, I. M. Jitea & S. Aerts (eds.) Know Your Food! – Food Ethics and Innovation (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers), pp. 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Main, D. (2009) Application of welfare assessment to commercial livestock production. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12, 97–104. doi: 10.1080/10888700902719658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main, D. C. J., Kent, J. P., Wemelsfelder, F., Ofner, E. & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2003) Applications for methods of on-farm welfare assessment. Animal Welfare, 12, 523–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachern, M. & Tregear, A. (2000) Farm animal welfare in the UK: A comparison of assurance schemes. Farm Management, 10, 685–708.
   Google Scholar
• Mullan, S., Edwards, S. A., Butterworth, A., Whay, H. R. & Main, D. C. J. (2011) A pilot investigation of farm assurance assessors’ attitude to farm animal welfare as a confounding factor to training in pig welfare outcome measures. Animal Welfare, 20, 413–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RÅ (1994) Regeringsrättens årsbok ref 29 [The Supreme Administrative Court’s yearbook ref 29] http://www.notisum.se/Pub/Doc.aspx?url=/rnp/domar/rr/RR994029.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rushen, J. & de Passillé, A. M. (2009) The scientific basis of animal welfare indicators. In F. J. M. Smulders & B. Algers (eds.) Welfare of Production Animals: Assessment and Management of Risks (Wageningen: Wageningen Acedemic Publishers), pp. 391–415.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S. (2013) The animal’s dignity in Swiss animal welfare legislation – challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 84, 251–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlageter-Tello, A., Bokkers, E. A. M., Koerkamp, P., Van Hertem, T., Viazzi, S., Romanini, C. E. B., Halachmi, I., Bahr, C., Berckmans, D. & Lokhorst, K. (2014) Manual and automatic locomotion scoring systems in dairy cows: A review. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 116, 12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Government (1988) Regeringens Proposition 1987/88:93 Djurskyddslag, m.m. [ Government bill 1987/88:93 Animal Wefare Act, etc]. (Stockholm: Norstedts Tryckeri).
   Google Scholar
• Växa Sweden (2014a) Det finns en kokontroll för alla [There is a official milk recording scheme for all]. Accessed 17 March 2014, available at: http://www.vxa.se/Radgivning-service/Mjolk--Kottdata/Kokontroll-med-produktionsrapporter/
   Google Scholar
• Växa Sweden (2014b) Fråga kon [Ask the cow]. Accessed 17 March 2014, available at: http://www.vxa.se/Documents/Produktblad/Fraga_Kon_okt_13.pdf?epslanguage=sv
   Google Scholar
• Växa Sweden (2014c) Signaler djurvälfärd [Animal welfare signals]. Accessed 17 March 2014, available at: http://www.vxa.se/Global/Dokument/Dokumentarkiv/Produkter%20och%20tj%c3%a4nster/Produktblad/Signaler_djurvalfard_okt_13.pdf?epslanguage=sv
   Google Scholar
• Veissier, I., Capdeville, J. & Delval, E. (2004) Cubicle housing systems for cattle: Comfort of dairy cows depends on cubicle adjustment. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3321–3337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, M., Engel, B., den Uijl, I., van Schaik, G., Dijkstra, T., de Boer, I. J. M. & Bokkers, E. A. M. (2013) Assessment time of the welfare quality® protocol for dairy cattle. Animal Welfare, 22, 85–93. doi: 10.7120/09627286.22.1.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, B. (2011) Reglering och förvaltning av produktions-och slaktdjurs välbefinnande - En offentligrättslig undersökning. [ Legislation and Supervision of the Welfare of Farm and Slaughter Animals]. (Åbo: Department of Law, Åbo Akademi University).
   Google Scholar
• Whay, H. R., Main, D. C. J., Green, L. E. & Webster, A. J. F. (2003) Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: Consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare, 12, 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeates, J. W. (2013) Individualism and nonindividualism in the application of nonhuman animal welfare to policy. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 16, 254–271. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2013.768918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar