Juice from silage in green bio refineries – a potential feed ingredient in liquid diets to weaned pigs

References

• Andersson, K., Schaub, A., Andersson, K., Lundström, K., Tomke, S. & Hansson, I. (1997). The effects of feeding system, Lysine content and gilt contact on performance, skatole contents and economy of entire male pigs. Livestock Production Science, 51, 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Aronsson, H., Torstensson, G. & Bergström, L. (2007). Leaching and crop uptake of N, P and K from organic and conventional cropping systems in a clay soil. Soil Use and Management, 23, 71–81. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadoux, S., Boizard, H., Marsac, S., Labalette, F., Briand, S., Preudhomme, M., Labalette, F. & Savouré, M. L. (2010). Biomass productivity of different energy crops under French conditions. 18 European Biomass Conference & Exhibition, May 2010, Lyon, France. hal-02755975.
   Google Scholar
• Canibe, N. & Jensen, B. B. (2003). Fermented and nonfermented liquid feed to growing pigs: Effect on aspects of gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 2019–2031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, B. (2008). Biofuels: thinking clearly about the issues. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(11), 3885–3891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, J., Mattsson, L. & Söderström, M. (2010). Tillståndet i svensk åkermark och gröda, data från 2001-2007. (Current status of Swedish arable soils and cereal crops. Data from the period 2001-2007). The state of Swedish arable land and crop data from 2001-2007) Report 6349. Swedish Environment Protect Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. ISBN 978-91-620- 6349-8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics — 2020 edition, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/12069644/KS-FK-20-001-EN-N.pdf. doi:10.2785/143455
   Google Scholar
• Franco, M., Jalava, T., Stefański, T., Kuoppala, K., Timonen, P., Winquist, E. & Rinne, M. (2018). Grass silage for biorefinery – Effect of additives on silage quality and liquid-solid separation in timothy and red clover silages. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Feed Science Conference, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, J. E., Jørgensen, U., Lærke, P. E., Manevski, K., Boelt, B., Krogh Jensen, S., Weisbjerg, M. R., Dalsgaard, T. K., Danielsen, M., Asp, T., Amby-Jensen, M., Grøn Sørensen, C. A., Vestby Jensen, M., Gylling, M., Lindedam, J., Lübeck, M. & Fog, E. (2017). Green Biomass – Protein Production Through Bio-Refining. DCA Report 093 (Aarhus: Aarhus University).
   Google Scholar
• Keto, L., Tsitkob, I., Perttiläc, S., Särkijärvia, S., Immonend, N., Kytöläd, K., Alakomib, H.-L., Hyytiäinen-Pabstb, T., Saarelab, M. & Rinne, M. (2021). Effect of silage juice feeding on pig production performance, meat quality and gut microbiome. Livestock Science, 254. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KRAV. (2021). KRAV standards adapted to the IFOAM Standards and included in the IFOAM Family of Standards. The KRAV Standards also comply with the EU regulation for organic production (EU) No 2018/848 (as of January 1 2022), available at: https://www.krav.se/en/standards/
   Google Scholar
• Manevski, K., Lærke, P. E., Jiao, X., Santhome, S. & Jørgensen, U. (2017). Biomass productivity and radiation utilisation of innovative cropping systems for biorefinery. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 233, 250–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manevski, K., Lærke, P. E., Olesen, J. E. & Jørgensen, U. (2018). Nitrogen balances of innovative cropping systems for feedstock production to future biorefineries. Science of The Total Environment, 633. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missotten, J. A. M., Michiels, J., Degroote, J. & De Smet, S. (2015). Fermented liquid feed for pigs: an ancient technique for the future. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 6, 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, E. (2021). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindran, R., Koopmans, S., Sanders, J. P. M., McMahon, H. & Gaffey, J. (2021). Production of Green biorefinery protein concentrate derived from perennial ryegrass as an alternative feed for pigs. Clean Technologies, 3, 656–669. doi:10.3390/cleantechnol3030039
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, M., Keto, L., Siljander-Rasi, H., Stefanski, T. & Winquist, E. (2018). Grass silage for biorefinery – Palatability of silage juice for growing pigs and dairy cows. XVIII International Silage Conference, Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• SAS.(2021). Statistical Analysis System: SAS Release 9.4. NorthCarolina, USA: SAS Institute Inc. Cary.
   Google Scholar
• Solati, Z., Jørgensen, U., Eriksen, J. & Søegaard, K. (2017). Dry matter yield, chemical composition and estimated extractable protein of legume and grass species during the spring growth. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 97, 3958–3966. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stødkilde, L., Damborg, V. K., Jørgensen, H., Lærke, H. N. & Jensen, S. K. (2018). White clover fractions as protein source for monogastrics: dry matter digestibility and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98, 2557–2563. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stødkilde, L., Damborg, V. K., Jørgensen, H., Lærke, H. N. & Jensen, S. K. (2019). Digestibility of fractionated green biomass as protein source for monogastric animals. Animal, 13(9), 1817–1825. doi:10.1017/S1751731119000156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stødkilde, L., Lashkari, S., Eriksen, J. & Krogh Jensen, S. (2021). Enhancing protein recovery in green biorefineries through selection of plant species and time of harvest. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 278. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2021). Use of agricultural land 2021. Preliminary statistics, available at: https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2021-05-20-jordbruksmarkens-anvandning-2021.-preliminar-statistik#h-SummaryinEnglish
   Google Scholar
• Tampio, E., Winquist, E., Luostarinen, S. & Rinne, M. (2019). A farm-scale grass biorefinery concept for a combined pig feed and biogass production. Water Science and Technology, 80, 1043–1052. doi:10.2166/wst.2019.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidåker, P., Rosenqvist, H., Gunnarsson, C. & Bergkvist, G. (2016). Räkna med vall. Hur påverkas ekonomi och miljö när vall införs i spannmålsdominerade växtföljder? In: JTI – Institutet för jordbruks- och miljöteknik (ed.), Rapport 445, Lantbruk & Industri, Uppsala (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• WinPig. (2021). Piglet production annual average figures 2020-2021-02-29. WinPig Support, Gård Djurhälsan, Kungsängens gård, 753 23 Uppsala, Sweden, available at: https://www.gardochdjurhalsan.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/smagrisprod-medel-2020-25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xiu, S. & Shahbazi, A. (2015). Development of green biorefinery for biomass utilization: A review. Trends in Renewable Energy, 1, 4–15. ISSN: 2376-2144. Invited Review Article, available at: futureenergysp.com/index.php/tre
   Google Scholar