Labour in suckler cow herds – a study on enterprises in southern Sweden

References

• Abeyasekera, S. & Lawson-McDowall, J. (2001). Computerising and Analysing Qualitative Information from a Study Concerning Activity Diaries (Chatham: Natural Resources Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. (2016). Beef: Cost of production benchmarks - suckler herds. Accessed 13 June 2022, available at: https://ahdb.org.uk/beef-cost-of-production-benchmarks/suckler-herds.
   Google Scholar
• Agriwise. (2000). Agriwise-SLU. Accessed 9 June 2022, available at: http://www.agriwise.org/Databoken/index_oldfiles_12.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Agriwise. (2022). Agriwise - Smart kalkylering. Accessed 5 April 2022, available at: https://www.agriwise.se/web.
   Google Scholar
• Bostad, E., Swensson, C. & Pinzke, S. (2011). Labour input in specialist beef bull production in Sweden. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 13(3). Accessed 9 May 2018, available at: http://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/view/1920.
   Google Scholar
• Cederberg, C., Henriksson, M. & Rosenqvist, H. (2018). Ekonomi och ekosystemtjänster i gräsbaserad mjölk- och nötköttsproduktion. Chalmers tekniska högskola, Göteborg: Instutitionen för rymd-. geo- och miljövetenskap.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, O. (2022). Coproduction of food, cultural heritage and biodiversity by livestock grazing in Swedish semi-natural grasslands. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. Accessed 28 October 2022, available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389fsufs.2022.801327.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2022). Database Eurostat. Accessed 28 February 2022, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, R. J., Leahy, H., O’Riordan, E. G. & Ruane, D. (2006). A Study of Time and Labour Use on Irish Suckler Beef Farms (Dunsany: Teagasc). Accessed 28 February 2022, available at: https://t-stor.teagasc.ie/handle/11019/1133.
   Google Scholar
• Finneran, E. & Crosson, P. (2013). Effects of scale, intensity and farm structure on the income efficiency of Irish beef farms. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 2(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gård & Djurhälsan. (2022). Accessed 5 April 2022, available at: https://www.gardochdjurhalsan.se/.
   Google Scholar
• Government Offices of Sweden. (2004). Genomförandet av EU:s jordbruksreform i Sverige/ Implementation of the EU agricultural reform in Sweden. Accessed 16 November 2017, available at: http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/departementsserien-och-promemorior/2004/01/ds-20049/.
   Google Scholar
• Hanauer, M. (2015). Comparative Ecological and Functional Analysis of Grazing Systems. Regensburg: Der fakultät für Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin; Accessed 5 October 2022, available at: https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/33329/1/Dissertation_Maria%20Hanauer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Högberg, N. (2021). Sensing the worms - automated behaviour monitoring for detection of parasitism in grazing livestock. Dissertation. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, available at: https://publications.slu.se/?file=publ/show&id=111607.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, K., Hessle, A., Andersson, H. & Kumm, K.-I. (2018). Merging small scattered pastures into large pasture-forest mosaics can improve profitability in Swedish suckler-based beef production. Land, 7(2), 58. doi:10.3390/land7020058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström, K., Kumm, K.-I., Andersson, H., Nadeau, E., Segerkvist, K. A. & Hessle, A. (2021). Economic incentives for preserving biodiverse semi-natural pastures with calves from dairy cows. Journal for Nature Conservation, 62, 126010. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. (2020). Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra.
   Google Scholar
• Kumm, K.-I. (2006). Scenarios for profitable beef and lamb production. ResearchGate. Accessed 15 May 2017, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242112192_Vagar_till_lonsam_not-_och_lammkottsproduktion_Scenarios_for_profitable_beef_and_lamb_production.
   Google Scholar
• Kumm, K.-I. & Hessle, A. (2020). Economic comparison between pasture-based beef production and afforestation of abandoned land in Swedish forest districts. Land, 9(2), 42. doi:10.3390/land9020042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langemeier, M. R., McGrann, J. M. & Parker, J. (2004). Beef cattle handbook: Economies of size in cow-calf production. Accessed 24 April 2017, available at: http://www.iowabeefcenter.org/bch/CowCalfEconomySize.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Le, S., Josse, J. & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, H., Ruane, D. J., O'Riordan, G. E. (2004). An investigation into the impact of farm labour use on Irish suckler beef farms. In: Dublin: 20th Annual Conference AIAEE, pp. 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Lowman, B. G., Hankey, M. S., Scott, N. A., Deas, D. W. & Hunter, E. A. (1981). Influence of time of feeding on time of parturition in beef cows. The Veterinary Record, 109(25–26), 557–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, B.-O. (2002). Kalkylmodell för nötköttsproduktion. Ängelholm: Skogs- och lantarbetsgivareförbundets analysgrupp.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsch, U. (2009). Bönder, myndigheter och naturbetesmarker. Uppsala: Centrum för biologisk mångfald, Swedish University of Agriculture; Accessed 5 April 2023, available at: https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/cbm/dokument/publikationer-cbm/cbm-skriftserie/skrift23.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Innovation, agricultural productivity and sustainability in Sweden. oecd-ilibrary.org. Accessed 12 May 2022, available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/innovation-agricultural-productivity-and-sustainability-in-sweden_9789264085268-en.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, C., Nehring, R., Banker, D. & Somwaru, A. (2004). Scale economies and efficiency in U.S. agriculture: Are traditional farms history? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22(3), 185–205. doi:10.1007/s11123-004-7573-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pykälä, J. (2005). Cattle grazing increases plant species richness of most species trait groups in mesic semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecology, 175(2), 217–226. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-0015-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Accessed 31 May 2022, available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Redman, G. (2020). John Nix Pocketbook for Farm Management for 2021 (Leicestershire: Agro Business Consultants Ltd). www.thepocketbook.co.uk.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2022). RStudio: Integrated Development for R, available at: http://www.rstudio.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Schrade, S., Keck, M., Schick, M. & Krause, M. (2005). Determination of working-time requirement in suckler cattle farming using a combination of recording methods. Accessed 27 February 2022, available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Determination-of-working-time-requirement-in-cattle-Schrade-Keck/c3aab12d821c13a47c7b9aae4ab782bb7de5eb1b.
   Google Scholar
• Setten, G. (2002). Bonden og landskapet (Trondheim: Geografisk institutt, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet). Accessed 5 April 2023, available at: https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/265231/123952_FULLTEXT01.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, Y., Zhao, S., Nossal, K. & Zhang, D. (2015). Productivity and farm size in Australian agriculture: Reinvestigating the returns to scale. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 59(1), 16–38. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short SD. (2001). Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Cow-Calf Operations (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service). Accessed 24 April 2017, available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=47151.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2019). SJVFS 2019:18: Statens jordbruksverks föreskrifter och allmänna råd om nötkreaturshållning inom lantbruket/The regulations and general advice of the Swedish Board of Agriculture about cattle farming in agriculture. Jönköping, Sweden. Accessed 6 April 2023, available at: https://lagen.nu/sjvfs/2019:18.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2021a). Den vanligaste besättningsstorleken för kor för uppfödning av kalvar är 25-49 kor. Jordbruket i siffror. Accessed 9 June 2022, available at: https://jordbruketisiffror.wordpress.com/2021/11/10/den-vanligaste-besattningsstorleken-for-kor-for-uppfodning-av-kalvar-ar-25-49-kor/.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2021b). The farm economics surveys (JEU) 2021. Accessed 16 March 2023, available at: https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2023-02-24-jordbruksekonomiska-undersokningen-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2022). Statistics Sweden. Accessed 27 February 2023, available at: https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2022-07-05-jordbruksstatistisk—sammanstallning-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Veysset, P., Lherm, M., Roulenc, M., Troquier, C. & Bébin, D. (2015). Productivity and technical efficiency of suckler beef production systems: Trends for the period 1990–2012. Animal, 9(12), 2050–2059. doi:10.1017/S1751731115002013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar