Can within field yield variation be explained using horizontal penetrometer resistance and electrical conductivity measurements? Results from three Swedish fields

References

• Banton O, Seguin MK, Cimon MA. 1997. Mapping field-scale physical properties of soil with electrical resistivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 61:1010–1017. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040003x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso B, Bertocco M, Sartori L, Martin EC. 2007. Analyzing the effects of climate variability on spatial pattern of yield in a maize–wheat–soybean rotation. Eur J Agron. 26:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2006.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisso FE, Schjonning P, Keller T, Lamande M, Etana A, de Jonge LW, Iversen BV, Arvidsson J, Forkman J. 2012. Persistent effects of subsoil compaction on pore size distribution and gas transport in a loamy soil. Soil Till Res. 122:42–51. English. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisso FE, Schjønning P, Keller T, Lamandé M, Simojoki A, Iversen BV, Alakukku L, Forkman J. 2013. Gas transport and subsoil pore characteristics: anisotropy and long-term effects of compaction. Geoderma. 195-196:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölenius E, Stenberg B, Arvidsson J. 2017. Within field cereal yield variability as affected by soil physical properties and weather variations–A case study in east central Sweden. Geoderma Regional. 11:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2017.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Boon NE, Yahya A, Kheiralla AF, Wee BS, Gew SK. 2005. Tractor-mounted, automated soil penetrometer-shearometer unit for mapping soil mechanical properties. Biosyst Eng. 90:381–396. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll Z, Oliver MA. 2005. Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma. 128:354–374. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik I, Gunal H, Budak M, Akpinar C. 2010. Effects of long-term organic and mineral fertilizers on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi-arid Mediterranean soil conditions. Geoderma. 160:236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin D, Lesch S. 2005. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput Electron Agr. 46:11–43. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland R. 1989. Review of soil moisture sensing using soil electrical conductivity. T Asae. 32:2190–2194. doi: 10.13031/2013.31283
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Larson W. 1979. A model for predicting packing density of soils using particle-size distribution. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 43:758–764. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300040028x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson I, Voorhees WB, Elonen P, Raghavan GSV, Lowery B, Van Wijk ALM, Rasmussen K, Riley H. 1987. Effect of high axle-load traffic on subsoil compaction and crop yield in humid regions with annual freezing. Soil Till Res. 10(3):259–268. doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(87)90032-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartge KH, Bohne H, Schrey HP, Extra H. 1985. Penetrometer measurements for screening soil physical variability. Soil Till Res. 5:343–350. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(85)80002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CK, Doran JW, Duke HR, Wienhold BJ, Eskridge KM, Shanahan JF. 2001. Field-scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 65:1829–1837. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2001.1829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller T, Sutter JA, Nissen K, Rydberg T. 2012. Using field measurement of saturated soil hydraulic conductivity to detect low-yielding zones in three Swedish fields. Soil Till Res. 124:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakural B, Robert P, Hugins D. 1998. Use of non-contacting electromagnetic inductive method for estimating soil moisture across a landscape. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 29:2055–2065. doi: 10.1080/00103629809370093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic K, Ozgoz E, Akbas F. 2004. Assessment of spatial variability in penetration resistance as related to some soil physical properties of two fluvents in Turkey. Soil Till Res. 76:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2003.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantmäteriet. 2016. Quality description of National Elevation Model, version 1:1, 2016-12-01.
   Google Scholar
• Lapen DR, Topp GC, Gregorich EG, Hayhoe HN, Curnoe WE. 2001. Divisive field-scale associations between corn yields, management, and soil information. Soil Till Res. 58:193–206. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00168-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley GJ, Laryea KB. 1994. Spatial variability in penetration resistance of a Hardsetting Tropical Alfisol. Soil Till Res. 29:367–381. doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90109-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado S, Bynum ED, Archer TL, Bordovsky J, Rosenow DT, Peterson C, Bronson K, Nesmith DM, Lascano RJ, Wilson LT, et al. 2002. Spatial and temporal variability of sorghum grain yield: influence of soil, water, pests, and diseases relationships. Precis Agric. 3:389–406. doi: 10.1023/A:1021597023005
   Google Scholar
• Mulqueen J, Stafford JV, Tanner DW. 1977. Evaluation of penetrometers for measuring soil strength. J Terramechanics. 14:137–151. doi: 10.1016/0022-4898(77)90012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderi-Boldaji M, Sharifi A, Alimardani R, Hemmat A, Keyhani A, Loonstra E, Weisskopf P, Stettler M, Keller T. 2013. Use of a triple-sensor fusion system for on-the-go measurement of soil compaction. Soil Till Res. 128:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng X, Horn R. 2008. Time-dependent, anisotropic pore structure and soil strength in a 10-year period after intensive tractor wheeling under conservation and conventional tillage. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 171:936–944. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200700084
   Google Scholar
• Piikki K, Söderström M, Stadig H. 2017. Local adaptation of a national digital soil map for use in precision agriculture. Adv Anim Biosci Precis Agric. 8(2):430–432.
   Google Scholar
• Pringle MJ, Lark RM. 2007. Scale- and location-dependent correlations of soil strength and the yield of wheat. Soil Till Res. 95:47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2006.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raczkowski CW, Mueller JP, Busscher WJ, Bell MC, McGraw ML. 2012. Soil physical properties of agricultural systems in a large-scale study. Soil Till Res. 119:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter S, Weller U, Vogel HJ. 2011. Soil-structure development including seasonal dynamics in a long-term fertilization experiment. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 174:395–403. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201000103
   Google Scholar
• Seladji S, Cosenza P, Tabbagh A, Ranger J, Richard G. 2010. The effect of compaction on soil electrical resistivity: a laboratory investigation. Eur J Soil Sci. 61:1043–1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets KR, Hendricks JM. 1995. Noninvasive soil water content measurement using electromagnetic induction. Water Resour Res. 31:2401–2409. doi: 10.1029/95WR01949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirjacobs D, Hanquet B, Lebeau F, Destain MF. 2002. On-line soil mechanical resistance mapping and correlation with soil physical properties for precision agriculture. Soil Till Res. 64:231–242. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00266-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey L, Busscher W, Campbell R. 1986. The effect of texture on strength of southeastern coastal plain soils. Soil Til Res. 6:351–363. doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(86)90033-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cheng Q, Lin J, Schellberg J, Schulze Lammers P. 2013. Investigating soil physical properties and yield response in a grassland field using a dual-sensor penetrometer and EM38. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 176:209–216. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201200104
   Google Scholar
• [SGU] Sveriges geoligiska undersökning. 2016. Geokartan. https://apps.sgu.se/geokartan/.
   Google Scholar
• To J, Kay BD. 2005. Variation in penetrometer resistance with soil properties: the contribution of effective stress and implications for pedotransfer functions. Geoderma. 126:261–276. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachaud G, Passerat de Silans A, Balabanis P, Vauclin M. 1985. Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 49:822–828. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040006x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz CM, Bassoi LH, Hopmans JW. 2001. Contribution of water content and bulk density to field soil penetration resistance as measured by a combined cone penetrometer–TDR probe. Soil Till Res. 60:35–42. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00173-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb RH. 2002. Recovery of severely compacted soils in the Mojave Desert, California, USA. Arid Land Res Manag. 16:291–305. doi: 10.1080/153249802760284829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklert P. 1961. On the relationship between structure, root development and course of drying in soils (In Swedish with English summary). Grundförbättring. 14:221–239.
   Google Scholar