Participatory evaluation of lupine genotypes on biomass and grain yield performance and nutritional value in the highland of Ethiopia

References

• Agza B, Kassa B, Zewdu S, Aklilu E, Alemu F. 2013. Forage yield and nutritive value of natural pastures at varying levels of maturity in North West Lowlands of Ethiopia. World J Agricult Sci. 1:106–112. http://wsrjournals.org/journal/wjas.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar MZ, Khan M, Saeed I, Akhtar A, Zahid S, Majid A. 2012. Small farmers perceptions regarding improved fodder and forage varieties: results of participatory on farm research. Pakistan J Agricult Res. 25:295–306. http://www.pjar.org.pk/Issues/Vol25_2012No_4/Vol25No_4Page295.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC (Association of Official Analytic Chemists). 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. Arlington, Virginia: AOAC. Inc. Anc.
   Google Scholar
• Ba NX, Van NH, Scandrett J, Vy LV, Tung HV, Nghi NT, Tuan DT, Lane P, Parsons D. 2014. Improved forage varieties for smallholder cattle farmers in South Central Coastal Vietnam. Livestock Res Rural Develop. 26:1–15. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Parsons-9/publication/265384946_.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall A, Jewkes R. 1995. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 41(12):1667–1676. https://scholar.google.com. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2017. Agricultural sample survey, report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Federal democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. Statistical Bull. 2:585. April 2017, Ethiopia.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser MD, Fychan R, Jones R. 2005. Comparative yield and chemical composition of two varieties of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) when harvested as whole-crop, moist grain and dry grain. Animal Feed Sci Tech. 120:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebede G, Assefa G, Feyissa F, Mengistu A. 2016. Forage legumes in crop-livestock mixed farming systems: a review. Int J Livestock Res. 6:1–18. DOI:10.5455/ijlr.20160317124049.
   Google Scholar
• Kitaba A, Tamir B. 2007. Effect of harvesting stage and nutrient levels on nutritive values of natural pasture in central highlands of Ethiopia. Agricult Trop ET Subtropica. 40(1):7–12. http://www.agriculturaits.czu.cz/pdf_.
   Google Scholar
• Kohajdova Z, KaroVičoVá J, Schmidt Š. 2011. Lupin composition and possible use in bakery – a review. Czech J Food Sci. 29:203–211. https://www.agriculturejournals.Cz/public. doi: 10.17221/252/2009-CJFS
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlovich BS. 2002. Lupins: geography, classification, genetic resources and breeding. Bogouslav Kourlovitch. St. Petersburg: Intan; 480p. https://books.google.fi/books.
   Google Scholar
• Mulugeta A, Kassahun T, Dagne K, Dagne W. 2015. Extent and pattern of genetic diversity in Ethiopian white lupin landraces for agronomical and phonological traits. African Crop Sci J. 23:327–341. DOI:10.4314/acsj.v23i4.3.
   Google Scholar
• Nigussie Z. 2012. Contribution of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) for food security in North-Western Ethiopia: a review. Asian J Plant Sci. 11:200–205. DOI:10.3923/ajps.2012.200.205.
   Google Scholar
• Norton BW, Poppi DP. 1995. Composition and nutritional attributes of pasture legumes. Trop Legumes Animal Nutrition. 4:23–47. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?record ID = GB19960090518.
   Google Scholar
• Paul BK, Muhimuzi FL, Bacigale SB, Wimba BM, Chiuri WL, Amzati GS, Maass BL. 2016. Towards an assessment of on-farm niches for improved forages in Sud-Kivu, DR Congo. J Agricult Rural Develop Tropics Subtropics (JARTS). 117:243–254. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016092050939.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam DH, Wright J, Field LA, Ayisi KK. 1992. Seed yield and water-use efficiency of white lupin as influenced by irrigation, row spacing, and weeds. Agron J. 84(4):557–563. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400040003x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riga FT, Retta KS, Derseh MB. 2021. Yield and nutritional quality of sweet lupine (Lupinus angustifolius) grown in Midaltitudes of Lemo District, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Int J. Agron. 2021:1–10. Article ID 6674452. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6674452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz MA, Sotelo A 2001. Chemical composition, nutritive value, and toxicology evaluation of Mexican wild lupins. J Agricult Food Chem. 49:5336–5339. doi: 10.1021/jf010247v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2002. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. User's Guide, Version 9, Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon M. 2001. Evaluation of selected multipurpose trees as feed supplements in tef (Eragrostis tef) straw based feeding of Menz sheep. PhD. dissertation. Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/20026791799.
   Google Scholar
• Tadele Y, Mekasha Y, Tegegne F. 2014. Supplementation with different forms of processed lupin (Lupinus albus) grain in hay based feeding of washera sheep: effect on feed intake, digestibility body weight and carcass parameters. J Biol, Agricult Healthcare. 4:213–231. https://scholar.google.com.
   Google Scholar
• Tessema F. 2017. Biomass yield and nutritive value of sweet lupine in mid altitudes of Lemo District, Hadiya Zone, southern Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Wolaita Sodo University). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/103250.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci. 18:104–111. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB. 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods. A laboratory manual for Animal Science 613. New York: Cornel University, Ithaca.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. 2020. Participatory research methods – choice points in the research process. J Participatory Res Methods. 1:1–14. 13244.
   Google Scholar
• Yeheyis L, Kijora C, Melaku S, Girma A, Peters KJ. 2010. White lupin (Lupinus albus L.), the neglected multipurpose crop: Its production and utilization in the mixed crop-livestock farming system of Ethiopia. Livestock Res Rural Develop. 22. Article #74. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/4/yehe22074.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yeheyis L, Kijora C, Van Santen E, Peters KJ. 2012. Sweet annual lupins (Lupinus spp.); their adaptability and productivity in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. J. Animal Sci Adv. 2:201–215. www.grjournals.com.
   Google Scholar
• Yeheyis L, Kijora C, Wink M, Peters KJ. 2011. Effect of a traditional processing method on the chemical composition of local white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) seed in North-Western Ethiopia. Zeitschrift Naturforschung C. 66:403–408. DOI:10.1515/znc-2011-7-812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenesew A, Abel A, Molla T, Shiferaw D, Yihenew GS, Likawent Y, Agraw A, Dessalegn M. 2015. Best-Fit Practice Manual for Sweet Lupin (Lupinus Angustifolius L.) Production. Capacity building scaling up of evidence-based best practices in agricultural production in Ethiopia, working paper No.11. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/65609963.
   Google Scholar