Eye-tracking revision processes of translation students and professional translators

References

• Alves, F., & Vale, D. (2011). On drafting and revision in translation: A corpus linguistics oriented analysis of translation process data. Translation: Corpora, Computation, Cognition. Special Issue on Parallel Corpora: Annotation, Exploitation, Evaluation, 1(1), 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Angelone, E. (2013). The impact of process protocol self-analysis on errors in the translation product. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 8(2), 253–271. doi: 10.1075/tis.8.2.07ang
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoń, K. (2007). MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.6. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2017). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-13. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4
   Google Scholar
• Breedveld, H. (2002). Translation processes in time. Target, 14(2), 221–240. doi: 10.1075/target.14.2.03bre
   Google Scholar
• Carl, M. (2012, May). Translog-II : A Program for recording user activity data for empirical reading and writing research. The eighth international conference on language resources and evaluation, Istanbul, Tyrkiet, 2–6. Department of International Language Studies and Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, M., Kay, M., & Jensen, K. T. H. (2010, March). Long distance revisions in drafting and post-editing. International conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing 2010, Iasi, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, M., & Schaeffer, M. J. (2017). Models of the translation process. In J. Schwieter, & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The Handbook of translation studies and Cognition (pp. 50–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, M., Schaeffer, M., & Bangalore, S. (2016). The CRITT translation process research database. In M. Carl, S. Bangalore, & M. Schaeffer (Eds.), New directions in empirical translation process research - Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB (pp. 13–56). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Lima Fonseca, N. B. (2015). Directionality in translation: Investigating prototypical patterns in editing procedures. Translation and Interpreting, 7(1), 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragsted, B., & Carl, M. (2013). Towards a classification of translation styles based on eye-tracking and keylogging data. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 133–158. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.6
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and Deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., et al. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 16–55. doi: 10.2307/357381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Friendly, M., & Hong, J. (2017). Effects: Effect displays for linear, generalized linear, and other models. R package version 4.0-0. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effects
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (1983). Checking, revision and editing. In C. Picken (Ed.), The translator’s handbook (pp. 99–105). London: Aslib.
   Google Scholar
• Horguelin, P. A., & Brunette, L. (1998). Pratique de la révision. Brossard (Québec): Linguatech.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. (2018). Working styles of student translators in self-revision, other-revision and post-editing. In C. Walker, & M. Federico Federici (Eds.), Eye tracking and Multidisciplinary studies on translation, (pp. 145–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsen, A. H., & Dam, H. V. (2016). Translation revision: Correlating revision procedure and error detection. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 55, 143–156. doi: 10.7146/hjlcb.v0i55.24612
   Google Scholar
• ISO 17100:2015. (2015). Translation services-requirements for translation services. Technical Committee ISO/TC37, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, A. L. (2003). Effects of think aloud on translation speed, revision and segmentation. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process oriented research (pp. 69–95). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-33. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2018). Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.2.4. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package/emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Malkiel, B. (2009). From Antonia to my Antonia: Tracking self-corrections with Translog. In S. Göpferich, A. L. Jakobsen, & I. M. Mees (Eds.), Behind the Mind: Methods, models and results in translation process research (pp. 149–166). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Mertin, E. (2006). Prozessorientiertes Qualitätsmanagement im Dienstleistungsbereich Übersetzen. Leipziger Studien zur angewandten Linguistik und Translatologie, 2. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mossop, B. (2001). Revising and editing for translators. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mossop, B. (2014). Revising and editing for translators (3rd ed). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• PACTE. (2003). Building a translation competence model. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process oriented research (pp. 43–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robert, I., Van Waes, L. (2014). Selecting a translation revision procedure: do common sense and statistics agree? Perspectives, 22(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2013.871047
   Google Scholar
• Robert, I. S., Remael, A., & Ureel, J. J. (2017). Towards a model of translation revision competence. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 11(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1750399X.2016.1198183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M., & Milliken, G. A. (1980). Population marginal means in the linear model: An alternative to least squares means. The American Statistician, 34(4), 216–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, C. (2006). Revision from translators’ point of view: An interview study. Target: International Journal on Translation Studies, 18(2), 295–312. doi: 10.1075/target.18.2.05shi
   Google Scholar
• Shih, C. (2013). ‘Translators’ ‘end-revision’ processing patterns and maxims: A think-aloud protocol study. Arab World English Journal, 4(3), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Shreve, G. M., Angelone, E., & Lacruz, I. (2014). Efficacy of screen recording in the other-revision of translations: Episodic Memory and Event models. MonTi: Monografías de Traducción E Interpretación, 1, 225–245. doi: 10.6035/MonTI.2014.ne1.7
   Google Scholar