‘I am not a number’: on quantification and algorithmic norms in translation

References

• Amrhein, C., & Sennrich, R. (2022). Identifying Weaknesses in Machine Translation Metrics Through Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding: A Case Study for COMET. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2202.05148.
   Google Scholar
• Bapna, A., Caswell, I., Kreutzer, J., Firat, O., van Esch, D., Siddhant, A., Niu, M., Baljekar, P., Garcia, X., Macherey, W., Breiner, T., Axelrod, V., Riesa, J., Cao, C., Chen, M. X., Macherey, K., Krikun, M., Wang, P., Gutkin, A. … Hughes, M. (2022). Building machine translation systems for the next thousand languages’. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.03983.
   Google Scholar
• Berghofer, P., Goyal, P., & Wiltsche, H. A. (2021). Husserl, the mathematization of nature, and the informational reconstruction of quantum theory. Continental Philosophy Review, 54(4), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09523-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (1999). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change (3. Aufl). MIT Pr (Inside technology).
   Google Scholar
• Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Shaw Fordyce, C., & Monz, C. (2007). (Meta-) evaluation of machine Translation. In C. Callison-Burch, P. Koehn, C. Shaw Fordyce, & C. Monz (Eds.) Proceedings of the second workshop on statistical machine translation (pp. 136–158). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W07-0718.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s capacities and their measurement Nancy Cartwright. Clarendon Press (Clarendon Paperbacks Ser.).
   Google Scholar
• Castilho, S., Doherty, S., Gaspari, F., & Moorkens, J. (2018). Approaches to human and machine translation quality Assessment. In J. Moorkens, S. Castilho, F. Gaspari, & S. Doherty (Eds.), Translation quality assessment (pp. 9–38). (Machine translation: Technologies and applications). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91241-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Castilho, S., Mallon, C., Meister, R., & Yue, S. (2023, June 12-15). Do online machine translation systems care for context? What about a GPT model? 24th annual conference of the European association for machine translation (EAMT 2023), Tampere, Finland. https://doras.dcu.ie/28297/.
   Google Scholar
• Cattelan, A. (2017). T-Rank. A decision support system for project assignment. META-FORUM 2017, Brussels, Belgium, 13 November. http://www.meta-net.eu/events/meta-forum-2017/pdf/02-Session-06-06-Alessandro-Cattelan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chaitin, G. J. (2013). Proving darwin: Making biology mathematical (1st Vintage books ed). Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, A. (1997). Memes of translation: The spread of ideas in translation theory. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2(3), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, P., Kira, M., & Shani, A. B. (2008). What the world needs now is sustainable work systems. In P. Docherty, M. Kira, & A. B. Shani (Eds.), Creating sustainable work systems: Developing social sustainability (2nd ed, pp. 1–21). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drugan, J. (2013). Quality in professional translation: Assessment and improvement. Bloomsbury. Retrieved September 19, 2022, from https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/quality-in-professional-translation-9781441149541/.
   Google Scholar
• Duede, E. (2022). Instruments, agents, and artificial intelligence: Novel epistemic categories of reliability. Synthese, 200(6), 491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03975-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. M. M. (1954). The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, K. J. (2012). The industrialization of translation. Translation Spaces, 1, 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.1.07dun
   Google Scholar
• ELIS Research. (2023). European language industry survey 2023: Trends, expectations and concerns of the European language industry. 10. ELIA, EMT, EUATC, FIT Europe, GALA, LIND, Women In localization, pp. 1–56. https://elis-survey.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ELIS-2023-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Translated by J. Wilkinson. Vintage books. (Original work published 1954).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206.
   Google Scholar
• Fairwork. (2022). Working conditions in the global platform economy: Fairwork translation and transcription platform ratings 2022. Oxford, UK: Fairwork.
   Google Scholar
• Fırat, G., Gough, J., & Moorkens, J. (2024). Working Conditions of Translation Workers in the Digital Platform Economy. Perspectives, [Preprint], (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Folaron, D. A. (2012). Digitalizing translation. Translation Spaces, 1, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.1.02fol
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, M., Grangier, D., & Caswell, I. (2020). Bleu might be guilty but references are not innocent. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.5
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann, B. M., & Benesch, S. (2023). Friction-In-Design regulation as 21st century time, place and manner Restriction. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4178647
   Google Scholar
• Golumbia, D. (2009). The cultural logic of computation. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674053885
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Y., Timothy, B., Meghan, D., Maria, E., Teresa, L., & Lamia T. (2016). Is all that glitters in machine translation quality estimation really gold? In Y. Matsumoto, & R. Prasad (Eds.),Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th international conference on computational linguistics: Technical papers (pp. 3124–3134). The Coling 2016 Organizing Committee. https://aclanthology.org/C16-1294.
   Google Scholar
• Guerberof-Arenas, A., & Toral, A. (2022). Creativity in translation: Machine translation as a constraint for literary texts. Translation Spaces, 11(2), 184–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.21025.gue
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, N. M., Voita, E., & Martins, A. F. T. (2022). Looking for a needle in a haystack: A comprehensive study of hallucinations in neural machine translation. arXiv. Retrieved November 21, 2022, from http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05309.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987) The theory of communicative action: 2. Lifeworld and systems, a critique of functionalist reason. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, H., Aue, A., Chen, C., Chowdhary, V., Clark, J., Federmann, C., Huang, X., Junczys-Dowmunt, M., Lewis, W., Li, M., Liu, S., Liu, T., Luo, R., Menezes, A., Qin, T., Seide, F., Tan, X., Tian, F., Wu, L., … Zhou, M. (2018). Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translation. arXiv. Retrieved December 6, 2022 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05567.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking. Translated by J.M. Anderson and E.H. Freund. Harper & Row. https://books.google.ie/books?id=y8k7AQAAIAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. (2005). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global (1st edn). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195180992.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. (2022). The problem of Induction. In E. N. Zalta, & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Winter 2022. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/induction-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• Hendy, A., Abdelrehim, M., Sharaf, A., Raunak, V., Gabr, M., Matsushita, H., Jin Kim, Y., Afify, M., & Hassan Awadalla, H. (2023). How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2302.09210.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, S., do Carmo, F., Gough J., & Carnegie-Brown, A. (2023). From responsibilities to responsibility: A study of the effects of translation workflow automation. Journal of Specialised Translation (pp. 9–35), (40).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1947). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Edited by G. Schmid Noerr. Translated by E. Jephcott. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (1994). ISO 18587:2017. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/06/29/62970.html
   Google Scholar
• Jarrahi, M. H., Sutherland, W. (2019). Algorithmic management and algorithmic competencies: Understanding and appropriating algorithms in Gig Work. In Taylor, N., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M., & Nardi, B. (Eds.), Information in contemporary society (pp. 578–589). Springer International Publishing (Lecture notes in computer science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_55.
   Google Scholar
• Kocmi, T., Federmann, C., Grundkiewicz, R., Junczys-Dowmunt, M., Matsushita, H., & Menezes, A. (2021). To ship or not to ship: An extensive evaluation of automatic metrics for machine translation. In Proceedings of the sixth conference on machine translation. EMNLP-WMT 2021 (pp. 478–494). Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://aclanthology.org/2021.wmt-1.57
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, R. (2022). Some translation studies informed suggestions for further balancing methodologies for machine translation quality evaluation. Translation Spaces, 11(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.21026.kru
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läubli, S., Castilho, S., Neubig, G., Sennrich, R., Shen, Q., & Toral, A. (2020). A Set of recommendations for assessing human–machine parity in language Translation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitina, N. (2011). Requirements collection: The foundation of scope definition and scope management in localization projects. In K. J. Dunne, & E. S. Dunne (Eds.), American translators association scholarly monograph series (pp. 95–118). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xvi.07lev.
   Google Scholar
• Lommel, A. (2018). Metrics for translation quality assessment: A case for standardising error Typologies. In J. Moorkens, S. Castilho, F. Gaspari, S. Doherty (Eds.), Translation quality assessment (Machine translation: Technologies and applications) (pp. 109–127). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91241-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G., Livingstone, R., & Lukács, G. (2013). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialects. Nachdr. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, K., & Meylaerts, R. (2018). Introduction. In K. Marais, & R. Meylaerts (Eds.), Complexity thinking in translation studies: Methodological considerations (1st ed., pp. 1–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702017.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (2020). The next decade in AI: Four steps towards robust artificial intelligence. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06177 (Accessed: 22 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Massardo, I. (2019). Business analytics for translation and localization: The quality index. Wordbee, 10 January. Retrieved December 1, 2022 from https://wordbee.com/blog/localization-industry/business-analytics-for-translation-and-localization-the-quality-index/.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems (D. Wright, Ed.). Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mellinger, C. D., & Hanson, T. A. (2017). Quantitative research methods in translation and interpreting studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of Assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175249
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, A. (2022). The limits of the quantitative approach to discrimination. James Baldwin lecture. Princeton University, 11 October. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/talks/baldwin-discrimination/.
   Google Scholar
• NLLB team, Costa-jussà, M.R., Cross, J., Çelebi, O., Elbayad, M., Heafield, K., Heffernan, K., Kalbassi, E., Lam, J., Licht, D., Maillard, J.,Sun, A., Wang, S.,Wenzek, G., Youngblood, A., Akula, B., Barrault, L., Gonzalez, G. M., Hansanti, P. … & Wang, J. (2022). No language left behind: Scaling human-centered machine translation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.04672.
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M. (2020). Translation and practice theory. Routledge (Translation theories explored).
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (1st ed). Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Papineni, K., Salim, R., Todd, W., Wei-Jing, Z. (2002). Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In P. Isabelle, E. Charniak, & D. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. ACL 2002 (pp. 311–318). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073135.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics (1st ed). Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and literary study. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popel, M., Tomkova, M., Tomek, J., Kaiser, Ł., Uszkoreit, J., Bojar, O., & Žabokrtský, Z. (2020). Transforming machine translation: A deep learning system reaches news translation quality comparable to human professionals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18073-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pym, A. (2017). Translation and economics: Inclusive communication or language diversity? Perspectives, 25(3), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1287208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakamoto, A. (2018). Disruption in translator-client matching : Paid crowdsourcing platforms vs human project managers. Revista Tradumàtica, 16, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.218
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G. (2007). On validity theory and test validation. Educational Researcher, 36(8), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07311609
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (2020). Mathematization as social Process. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 605–608). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_112.
   Google Scholar
• Toral, A., Castilho, S., Hu, K., & Way, A. (2018). Attaining the unattainable? Reassessing claims of human parity in neural machine Translation. In Proceedings of the third conference on machine translation: Research papers (pp. 113–123). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-6312.
   Google Scholar
• Toury, G. (2012). Descriptive translation studies - and beyond. Benjamins (Benjamins translation library, 100).
   Google Scholar
• Van Harmelen, F. (2022). Preface. In P. Hitzler, & M. K. Sarker (Eds.), Neuro-Symbolic artificial intelligence: The state of the Art (pp. i–xii). IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanmassenhove, E., Emmery, C., & Shterionov, D. (2021). NeuTral rewriter: A rule-based and neural approach to automatic rewriting into gender-neutral alternatives. arXiv. Retrieved November 22, 2022, from http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06105
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, L. N., O'Hagan, M., & O'Sullivan, C. (2021). Understanding the societal impacts of machine translation: a critical review of the literature on medical and legal use cases. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1515–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. (2022). Beyond measure: The hidden history of measurement from cubits to quantum constants. Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Way, A. (2010). Panning for EBMT gold, or “remembering not to forget”. Machine Translation, 24(3), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-010-9085-2
   Google Scholar
• Way, A. (2018). Quality expectations of machine translation. In J. Moorkens, S. Castilho, F. Gaspari, S. Doherty (Eds.), Translation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice. Springer. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08409
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, W. (1949). Translation. In W. N. Locke, & A. D. Booth (Eds.), Machine translation of languages: Fourteen essays (pp. 15–23). New York: The Technology Press of MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Zanettin, F. (2013). Corpus methods for descriptive translation studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.618
   Google Scholar
• Zydroń, A. (2014). GMX-V: Slaying the word count dragon. Multilingual, 29 June, 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zydroń, A. (2017). GMX-V localization industry word count Standard. Translatig & the Computer 39, London, UK, November.
   Google Scholar