Environmental factors that shape biofilm formation

References

• Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000;54:49–79.10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westall F, de Wit MJ, Dann J, van der Gaast S, de Ronde CEJ, Gerneke D. Early Archean fossil bacteria and biofilms in hydrothermally-influenced sediments from the Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa. Precambrian Res. 2001;106:93–116.10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00127-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchner J, Wolf A, Buchholz F, et al. Miniaturized calorimetry—A new method for real-time biofilm activity analysis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2008;74:74–81.10.1016/j.mimet.2008.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW. Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002;56:187–209.10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002;15:167–193.10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickel JC, Ruseska I, Wright JB, Costerton JW. Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985;27:619–624.10.1128/AAC.27.4.619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlamakis H, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. Genes Dev. 2008;22:945–953.10.1101/gad.1645008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsek MR, Greenberg EP. Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:27–33.10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:95–108.10.1038/nrmicro821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole GA, Kolter R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;28:449–461.10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00797.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole GA, Kolter R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;30:295–304.10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova OE, Sauer K. Sticky situations: key components that control bacterial surface attachment. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:2413–2425.10.1128/JB.00003-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiazza NC, O’Toole GA. SadB is required for the transition from reversible to irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:4476–4485.10.1128/JB.186.14.4476-4485.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsa SM, Espinosa-Urgel M, Ramos JL, O’Toole GA. Transition from reversible to irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 requires an ABC transporter and a large secreted protein. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;49:905–918.10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03615.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono K, Oka R, Toyofuku M, et al. cAMP signaling affects irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:104–106.10.1264/jsme2.ME13151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough KA, Rodriguez A. The myriad roles of cyclic AMP in microbial pathogens: from signal to sword. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yawata Y, Cordero OX, Menolascina F, Hehemann JH, Polz MF, Stocker R. Competition-dispersal tradeoff ecologically differentiates recently speciated marine bacterioplankton populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014;111:5622–5627.10.1073/pnas.1318943111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Tseng B, Beckerman B, et al. Psl trails guide exploration and microcolony formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 2013;497:388–391.10.1038/nature12155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher K, Nadell CD, Stone HA, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. Solutions to the public goods dilemma in bacterial biofilms. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:50–55.10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Debeer D, Lewandowski Z. Liquid flow in biofilm systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:2711–2716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilking JN, Zaburdaev V, De Volder M, Losick R, Brenner MP, Weitz DA. Liquid transport facilitated by channels in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:848–852.10.1073/pnas.1216376110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yawata Y, Nomura N, Uchiyama H. Development of a novel biofilm continuous culture method for simultaneous assessment of architecture and gaseous metabolite production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:5429–5435.10.1128/AEM.00801-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H, Toyofuku M, Kiyokawa T, Ichihashi A, Tateda K, Nomura N. The impact of anaerobiosis on strain-dependent phenotypic variations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013;77:1747–1752.10.1271/bbb.130309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada M, Toyofuku M, Miyano T, Nomura N. cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidases, aerobic respiratory enzymes, impact the anaerobic life of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:3881–3889.10.1128/JB.01978-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obana N, Nakamura K, Nomura N. A sporulation factor is involved in the morphological change of Clostridium perfringens biofilms in response to temperature. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:1540–1550.10.1128/JB.01444-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles BR, Singh PK. Endogenous oxidative stress produces diversity and adaptability in biofilm communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:12503–12508.10.1073/pnas.0801499105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougald D, Rice SA, Barraud N, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S. Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:1–52.10.1128/MMBR.00043-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 1994;176:269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012;2:a012427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler BL, Losick R. Bacterially speaking. Cell. 2006;125:237–246.10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster M, Sexton DJ, Diggle SP, Greenberg EP. Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing: from evolution to application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;67:43–63.10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyofuku M, Nomura N, Fujii T, et al. Quorum sensing regulates denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:4969–4972.10.1128/JB.00289-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyofuku M, Nomura N, Kuno E, Tashiro Y, Nakajima T, Uchiyama H. Influence of the Pseudomonas quinolone signal on denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:7947–7956.10.1128/JB.00968-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashiro Y, Ichikawa S, Shimizu M, et al. Variation of physiochemical properties and cell association activity of membrane vesicles with growth phase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;76:3732–3739.10.1128/AEM.02794-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashiro Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Multifunctional membrane vesicles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;14:1349–1662.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02632.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, Greenberg EP. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 1998;280:295–298.10.1126/science.280.5361.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles BR, Horswill AR. agr-Mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Mekalanos JJ. Quorum sensing-dependent biofilms enhance colonization in Vibrio cholera. Dev. Cell. 2003;5:647–656.10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00295-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kievit TR. Quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;11:279–288.10.1111/emi.2009.11.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyofuku M, Roschitzki B, Riedel K, Eberl L. Identification of proteins associated with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm extracellular matrix. J. Proteome Res. 2012;11:4906–4915.10.1021/pr300395j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korber DR, Lawrence JR, Sutton B, Caldwell DE. The effect of laminar flow on the kinetics of surface recolonization by mott and mot- Pseudomonas fluorescens. Microb. Ecol. 1989;18:1–19.10.1007/BF02011692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE. Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 1991;173:6558–6567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer RJ, Sternberg C. Modern microscopy in biofilm research: confocal microscopy and other approaches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999;10:263–268.10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80046-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korber DR, Wolfaardt GM, Brözel V, MacDonald R, Niepel T. Reporter systems for microscopic analysis of microbial biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean RJ, Bates CCL, Barnes MB, McGowin CL, Aron GM. Methods of studying biofilms. In: Ghannoum M, O’Tool GA, editors. Microbial biofilms. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004. p. 379–413.
   Google Scholar
• Yawata Y, Toda K, Setoyama E, et al. Monitoring biofilm development in a microfluidic device using modified confocal reflection microscopy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010;110:377–380.10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inaba T, Ichihara T, Yawata Y, Toyofuku M, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Three- dimensional visualization of mixed species biofilm formation together with its substratum. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013;57:589–593.10.1111/mim.v57.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yawata Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Visualizing the effects of biofilm structures on the influx of fluorescent material using combined confocal reflection and fluorescent microscopy. Microbes Environ. 2010;25:49–52.10.1264/jsme2.ME09169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Weiss EC, Otto M, Fey PD, Smeltzer MS, Somerville GA. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm metabolism and the influence of arginine on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2007;75:4219–4226.10.1128/IAI.00509-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusconi R, Garren M, Stocker R. Microfluidics expanding the frontiers of microbial ecology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2014;43:65–91.10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-022916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter L, Stepper C, Mak A, et al. Development of a microfluidic biochip for online monitoring of fungal biofilm dynamics. Lab Chip. 2007;7:1723–1731.10.1039/b708236c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda K, Yawata Y, Setoyama E, Fukuda J, Nomura N, Suzuki H. Continuous monitoring of ammonia removal activity and observation of morphology of microbial complexes in a microdevice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:4253–4255.10.1128/AEM.01246-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yawata Y, Toda K, Setoyama E, et al. Bacterial growth monitoring in a microfluidic device by confocal reflection microscopy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010;110:130–133.10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Park HD, Chung S. Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation. Molecules. 2012;17:9818–9834.10.3390/molecules17089818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel AK, Hmelo L, Parsek MR, Whiteley M. Going local: technologies for exploring bacterial microenvironments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:337–348.10.1038/nrmicro3010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science. 2002;297:1183–1186.10.1126/science.1070919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson KS, Richards LA, Perez-Osorio AC, et al. Heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms includes expression of ribosome hibernation factors in the antibiotic-tolerant subpopulation and hypoxia-induced stress response in the metabolically active population. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:2062–2073.10.1128/JB.00022-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlamakis H, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. Genes Dev. 2008;22:945–953.10.1101/gad.1645008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007;5:48–56.10.1038/nrmicro1557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar