Three-dimensional graphene oxide-coated polyurethane foams beneficial to myogenesis

References

• Friedl P, Brocker EB. The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000;57:41–64.10.1007/s000180050498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, et al. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 2001;294:1708–1712.10.1126/science.1064829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barralet JE, Wang L, Lawson M, et al. Comparison of bone marrow cell growth on 2D and 3D alginate hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16:515–519.10.1007/s10856-005-0526-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada KM, Cukierman E. Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell. 2007;130:601–610.10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EHK. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:839–845.10.1038/nrm2236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Zou R, Zhao Z, et al. Tensile strain induces integrin β1 and ILK expression higher and faster in 3D cultured rat skeletal myoblasts than in 2D cultures. Tissue Cell. 2009;41:266–270.10.1016/j.tice.2008.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowska I, Szeliga A, Moraczewski J, et al. Comparison of satellite cell-derived myoblasts and C2C12 differentiation in two-and three-dimensional cultures: changes in adhesion protein expression. Cell Biol Int. 2011;35:125–133.10.1042/CBI20090335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005;4:518–524.10.1038/nmat1421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Zhang Q, Gao S, et al. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1433.10.1038/srep01604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger E, Chang AN, Brown D, et al. Graphene foam as a three-dimensional platform for myotube growth. ACS Biomater-Sci Eng. 2016;2:1234–1241.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiwara M, Kawahara T, Nobata R. Tissue in Cube: In Vitro 3D Culturing Platform with Hybrid Gel Cubes for Multidirectional Observations. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:1566–1571.10.1002/adhm.v5.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Lee Y, Shin YC, et al. In situ forming gelatin/graphene oxide hydrogels for facilitated C2C12 myoblast differentiation. Appl Spectrosc Rev.. 2016;51:527–539.10.1080/05704928.2016.1165686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Holzwarth JM, Ma PX. Functionalized Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Macromol Biosci. 2012;12:911–919.10.1002/mabi.201100466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EJ, Lee JH, Jin L, et al. Hyaluronic acid/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) core/shell fiber meshes loaded with epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate as skin tissue engineering scaffolds. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14:8458–8463.10.1166/jnn.2014.9922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jassal M, Sengupta S, Bhowmick S. Functionalization of electrospun poly (caprolactone) fibers for pH-controlled delivery of doxorubicin hydrochloride. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2015;26:1425–1438.10.1080/09205063.2015.1100495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YC, Shin DM, Lee EJ, et al. Hyaluronic acid/PLGA core/shell fiber matrices loaded with EGCG beneficial to diabetic wound healing. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2016;5:3035–3045.10.1002/adhm.201600658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Sacks MS, et al. Preparation and characterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3961–3971.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santerre JP, Woodhouse K, Laroche G, et al. Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: From classical implants to tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7457–7470.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Li L, Li K, et al. Antibacterial nanohydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffolds with silver phosphate particles for bone regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.. 2016;27:1584–1598.10.1080/09205063.2016.1221699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiono V, Mozetic P, Boffito M, et al. Polyurethane-based scaffolds for myocardial tissue engineering. Interface focus. 2014;4:20130045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janik H, Marzec M. A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C-Biomimetic Supramol Syst. 2015;48:586–591.10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baheiraei N, Yeganeh H, Ai J, et al. Preparation of a porous conductive scaffold from aniline pentamer-modified polyurethane/PCL blend for cardiac tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103:3179–3187.10.1002/jbm.a.35447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonda-Turo C, Boffito M, Cassino C, et al. Biomimetic polyurethane–based fibrous scaffolds. Mater Lett. 2016;167:9–12.10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YC, Lee JH, Kim MJ, et al. Stimulating effect of graphene oxide on myogenesis of C2C12 myoblasts on RGD peptide-decorated PLGA nanofiber matrices. J Biol Eng. 2015;9:577.10.1186/s13036-015-0020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing X, Mi H-Y, Salick MR, et al. Electrospinning thermoplastic polyurethane/graphene oxide scaffolds for small diameter vascular graft applications. Mater Sci Eng C-Biomimetic Supramol Syst. 2015;49:40–50.10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SR, Zihlmann C, Akbari M, et al. Reduced graphene oxide‐GelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small. 2016;12:3677–3689.10.1002/smll.v12.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Nayak TR, Hong H, et al. Graphene: a versatile nanoplatform for biomedical applications. Nanoscale. 2012;4:3833–3842.10.1039/c2nr31040f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artiles MS, Rout CS, Fisher TS. Graphene-based hybrid materials and devices for biosensing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:1352–1360.10.1016/j.addr.2011.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, Liu H, Fan Y. Graphene‐based materials in regenerative medicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:1451–1468.10.1002/adhm.v4.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Li K, Shi X, et al. Smart pH‐responsive nanocarriers based on nano‐graphene oxide for combined chemo‐and photothermal therapy overcoming drug resistance. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3:1261–1271.10.1002/adhm.v3.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Yuan Y, Wang T, et al. Targeted imaging and induction of apoptosis of drug-resistant hepatoma cells by miR-122-loaded graphene-InP nanocompounds. J Nanobiotechnol. 2017;15:376.10.1186/s12951-016-0237-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon OJ, Sohn IY, Kim DJ, et al. Enhancement of thermomechanical properties of poly (D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) and graphene oxide composite films for scaffolds. Macromol Res. 2012;20:789–794.10.1007/s13233-012-0116-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Qiu H, Si Y, et al. Fabrication of highly porous biodegradable monoliths strengthened by graphene oxide and their adsorption of metal ions. Carbon. 2011;49:827–837.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YC, Jin L, Lee JH, et al. Graphene oxide-incorporated PLGA-collagen fibrous matrices as biomimetic scaffolds for vascular smooth muscle cells. Sci Adv Mater. 2017;9:232–237.10.1166/sam.2017.2467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MJ, Lee JH, Shin YC, et al. Stimulated myogenic differentiation of C2C12 murine myoblasts by using graphene oxide. J Korean Phys Soc. 2015;67:1910–1914.10.3938/jkps.67.1910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KO, Lee JH, Park JH, et al. Graphene oxide-coated guided bone regeneration membranes with enhanced osteogenesis: Spectroscopic analysis and animal study. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2016;51:540–551.10.1080/05704928.2016.1165687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Shirazian SA, et al. Rolled graphene oxide foams as three-dimensional scaffolds for growth of neural fibers using electrical stimulation of stem cells. Carbon. 2016;97:71–77.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Nowicki M, Cui H, et al. 3D bioprinted graphene oxide-incorporated matrix for promoting chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Carbon. 2017;116:615–624.10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:1339–1339.10.1021/ja01539a017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Shin YC, Lee S-M, et al. Enhanced osteogenesis by reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YC, Lee JH, Jin OS, et al. Synergistic effects of reduced graphene oxide and hydroxyapatite on osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts. Carbon. 2015;95:1051–1060.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewska A, Yiu G, Yuste R. A custom-made two-photon microscope and deconvolution system. Pflügers Arch Eur J Phy. 2000;441:398–408.10.1007/s004240000435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovhannisyan V, Hu P-S, Chen S-J, et al. Elucidation of the mechanisms of optical clearing in collagen tissue with multiphoton imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:046004.10.1117/1.JBO.18.4.046004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku SH, Park CB. Myoblast differentiation on graphene oxide. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2017–2023.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards HGM, Farwell DW. Fourier transform-Raman spectroscopy of amber. Spectroc Acta A Molec Biomolec Spectr. 1996;52:1119–1125.10.1016/0584-8539(95)01643-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang ES, Khan SB, Seo J, et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel UV-Curable PU-Si hybrids: Influence of silica on thermal, mechanical, and water sorption properties of polyurethane acrylates. Macromol Res. 2011;19:1006.10.1007/s13233-011-1002-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SC, Some S, Kim SW, et al. Efficient direct reduction of graphene oxide by silicon substrate. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Lee S-M, Shin YC, et al. Spontaneous osteodifferentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by hydroxyapatite covered with graphene nanosheets. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2016;6:818–825.10.1166/jbt.2016.1506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudin KN, Ozbas B, Schniepp HC, et al. Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 2008;8:36–41.10.1021/nl071822y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran DNH, Kabiri S, Losic D. A green approach for the reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets using non-aromatic amino acids. Carbon. 2014;76:193–202.10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Yang S-T, Liu J-H, et al. In vitro toxicity evaluation of graphene oxide on A549 cells. Toxicol Lett. 2011;200:201–210.10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv M, Zhang Y, Liang L, et al. Effect of graphene oxide on undifferentiated and retinoic acid-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells line. Nanoscale. 2012;4:3861–3866.10.1039/c2nr30407d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz ON, Fernando KS, Wang B, et al. Graphene oxide: a nonspecific enhancer of cellular growth. ACS Nano. 2011;5:8100–8107.10.1021/nn202699t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Lim CHY, Shi H, et al. Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2011;5:7334–7341.10.1021/nn202190c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur AB, Collier TO, Kao WJ, et al. In vivo biocompatibility and biostability of modified polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;36:246–257.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guelcher SA, Srinivasan A, Dumas JE, et al. Synthesis, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and biodegradation of polyurethane networks from lysine polyisocyanates. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1762–1775.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science. 1990;248:73–76.10.1126/science.2321027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda K, Yasuda R. Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience. Neuron. 2006;50:823–839.10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benninger RKP, Piston DW. Two-photon excitation microscopy for the study of living cells and tissues. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2013;59:4.11.1–4.11.24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim MJ, Shin YC, Lee JH, et al. Multiphoton imaging of myogenic differentiation in gelatin-based hydrogels as tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials Research. 2016;20:55.10.1186/s40824-016-0050-x
   Google Scholar
• Shin YC, Lee JH, Jin L, et al. Cell-adhesive matrices composed of RGD peptide-displaying M13 bacteriophage/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers beneficial to myoblast differentiation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15:7907–7912.10.1166/jnn.2015.11214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YC, Lee JH, Jin L, et al. Stimulated myoblast differentiation on graphene oxide-impregnated PLGA-collagen hybrid fibre matrices. J Nanobiotechnol. 2015;13:1845.10.1186/s12951-015-0081-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossu G, Kelly R, Di Donna S, et al. Myoblast differentiation during mammalian somitogenesis is dependent upon a community effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:2254–2258.10.1073/pnas.92.6.2254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham M. How the community effect orchestrates muscle differentiation. BioEssays. 2003;25:13–16.10.1002/(ISSN)1521-1878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakus AE, Secor EB, Rutz AL, et al. Three-dimensional printing of high-content graphene scaffolds for electronic and biomedical applications. ACS Nano. 2015;9:4636–4648.10.1021/acsnano.5b01179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Wan J, Zhang S, et al. In vivo pharmacokinetics, long-term biodistribution, and toxicology of PEGylated graphene in mice. ACS Nano. 2010;5:516–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Gong H, Shi X, et al. In vivo biodistribution and toxicology of functionalized nano-graphene oxide in mice after oral and intraperitoneal administration. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2787–2795.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XD, Chen J, Min Y, et al. Metabolizable Bi2Se3 nanoplates: Biodistribution, toxicity, and uses for cancer radiation therapy and imaging. Adv Func Mater. 2014;24:1718–1729.10.1002/adfm.v24.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou F, Zhou H, Jeong DY, et al. Wrinkled surface-mediated antibacterial activity of graphene oxide nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:1343–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar