Development of arginine-glycine-aspartate-immobilized 3D printed poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering

References

• Varghese S, Theprungsirikul P, Sahani S, et al. Glucosamine modulates chondrocyte proliferation, matrix synthesis, and gene expression. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jan;15:59–68. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2006.06.008. PubMed PMID: 16849037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DA, Varghese S, Sharma B, et al. Multifunctional chondroitin sulphate for cartilage tissue-biomaterial integration. Nat. Mater.. 2007 May;6:385–392. DOI:10.1038/nmat1890. PubMed PMID: 17435762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C, et al. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2005 Feb;26:599–609. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.005. PubMed PMID: 15282138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Kim SH, Kim YH, et al. The effect of hybridization of hydrogels and poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffolds on cartilage tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21:581–592. DOI:10.1163/156856209X430579. PubMed PMID: 20338093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzeciak T, Rybka JD, Richter M, et al. Cells and nanomaterial-based tissue engineering techniques in the treatment of bone and cartilage injuries. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16:8948–8952. DOI:10.1166/jnn.2016.12732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly PE, Chen T, Finch A, et al. Photocrosslinked tyramine-substituted hyaluronate hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties improve immediate tissue-hydrogel interfacial strength in articular cartilage. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017 Apr;28:582–600. DOI:10.1080/09205063.2017.1289035. PubMed PMID: 28134036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutmacher DW. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues – state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001;12:107–124. PubMed PMID: 11334185.10.1163/156856201744489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll GA, Romanelli SM, Brown AM, et al. Multilayered short peptide-alginate blends as new materials for potential applications in cartilage tissue regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016 Mar;16:2464–2473. PubMed PMID: 27455656.10.1166/jnn.2016.12039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang BJ, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage. Biomaterials. 2016 Aug;98:1–22. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.018. PubMed PMID: 27177218; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4899115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Fu N, Xie J, et al. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) based electrospun 3D scaffolds for delivery of autogeneic chondrocytes and adipose-derived stem cells: evaluation of cartilage defects in rabbit. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015 Jan;11:105–116. PubMed PMID: 26301304.10.1166/jbn.2015.2053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang Y, Phadke A, Varghese S. Engineered microenvironments for self-renewal and musculoskeletal differentiation of stem cells. Regener Med. 2011 Jul;6:505–524. DOI:10.2217/rme.11.38. PubMed PMID: 21749208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim HL, Hwang Y, Kar M, et al. Smart hydrogels as functional biomimetic systems. Biomater Sci. 2014;2:603–618. DOI:10.1039/c3bm60288e. PubMed PMID: WOS:000333579600002; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao J, Qu Y, Chu B, et al. Biodegradable CSMA/PECA/graphene porous hybrid scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Sci Rep. 2015 May 11;5:9879. DOI:10.1038/srep09879. PubMed PMID: 25961959; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4426702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung KC, Tseng CS, Dai LG, et al. Water-based polyurethane 3D printed scaffolds with controlled release function for customized cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;83:156–168. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.019. PubMed PMID: 26774563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Biron RJ, et al. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biotechnology (NY). 1994 Jul;12:689–693. PubMed PMID: 7764913.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luu YK, Kim K, Hsiao BS, et al. Development of a nanostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA-PEG block copolymers. J Controlled Release. 2003 Apr 29;89:341–353. PubMed PMID: 12711456.10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00097-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang Y, Sangaj N, Varghese S. Interconnected macroporous poly(ethylene glycol) cryogels as a cell scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Oct;16:3033–3041. DOI:10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0045. PubMed PMID: 20486791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;32:773–785. DOI:10.1038/nbt.2958. PubMed PMID: 25093879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati F, Song TH, Rijal G, et al. Ornamenting 3D printed scaffolds with cell-laid extracellular matrix for bone tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2015 Jan;37:230–241. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.012. PubMed PMID: 25453953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li T, Ma H, et al. A 3D-printed scaffold with MoS2 nanosheets for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration [Original Article]. NPG Asia Mater. 2017 04/21/online;9:e376. DOI:10.1038/am.2017.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg JE, Placone JK, Smith BT, et al. Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite gradients. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017 Apr;28:532–554. DOI:10.1080/09205063.2017.1286184. PubMed PMID: 28125380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke MN, Fisher JP, Dean D, et al. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003 Feb 15;64B:65–69. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.10485. PubMed PMID: 12516080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du DJ , Asaoka T, Shinohara M, et al . Microstereolithography-based fabrication of anatomically shaped beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: Artn 859456. DOI: 10.1155/2015/859456. PubMed PMID: WOS:000363171000001; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong KF, Cheah CM, Chua CK. Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2003 Jun;24:2363–2378. PubMed PMID: 12699674.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer MD, Horch RA, Ambrose CG, et al. Effect of physiological temperature on the mechanical properties and network structure of biodegradable poly(propylene fumarate)-based networks. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2003;14:369–382. PubMed PMID: 12747675.10.1163/156856203321478874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer MD, Ambrose CG, Mikos AG. In vitro degradation of polymeric networks of poly(propylene fumarate) and the crosslinking macromer poly(propylene fumarate)-diacrylate. Biomaterials. 2003 Feb;24:571–577. PubMed PMID: 12437951.10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00368-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Miller AL 2nd, Waletzki BE, et al. Novel biodegradable poly(propylene fumarate)-co-poly(l-lactic acid) porous scaffolds fabricated by phase separation for tissue engineering applications. RSC Adv. 2015 Jan 1;5:21301–21309. DOI:10.1039/C5RA00508F. PubMed PMID: 26989483; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4792309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Lu L, Yaszemski MJ. Bone-tissue-engineering material poly(propylene fumarate): correlation between molecular weight, chain dimensions, and physical properties. Biomacromol. 2006 Jun;7:1976–1982. DOI:10.1021/bm060096a. PubMed PMID: 16768422; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2530912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JP, Dean D, Mikos AG. Photocrosslinking characteristics and mechanical properties of diethyl fumarate/poly(propylene fumarate) biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2002 Nov;23:4333–4343. PubMed PMID: 12219823.10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00178-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JP, Holland TA, Dean D, et al. Synthesis and properties of photocross-linked poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001 2001/01/01;12:673–687. DOI:10.1163/156856201316883476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beke S, Anjum F, Ceseracciu L, et al. Rapid fabrication of rigid biodegradable scaffolds by excimer laser mask projection technique: a comparison between 248 and 308 nm. Laser Phys. 2013 Mar;23: Artn 035602. DOI:10.1088/1054-660x/23/3/035602. PubMed PMID: WOS:000318005700023; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JM, Bodamer E, Krebs O, et al. Effect of chemical and physical properties on the in vitro degradation of 3D printed high resolution poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds. Biomacromol. 2017 Apr 10;18:1419–1425. DOI:10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00146. PubMed PMID: 28291335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang A, Li J, Zhao S, et al. Biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds based on nanocellulose/PLGA nanocomposite for NIH 3T3 cell cultivation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;17:3888–3895. DOI:10.1166/jnn.2017.13115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials. 2003 Nov;24:4385–4415. DOI:10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0. PubMed PMID: WOS:000185037700006; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke MN, Fisher JP, Dean D, et al. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2003 Feb 15;64:65–69. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.10485. PubMed PMID: WOS:000182424600002; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer AA, Hennessy KM, Bellis SL. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell attachment and spreading on hydroxyapatite by RGD peptides and adsorbed serum proteins. Biomaterials. 2005 May;26:1467–1475. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.008. PubMed PMID: WOS:000226422200003; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MO, Vorwald CE, Dreher ML, et al. Evaluating 3D-printed biomaterials as scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering. Adv Mater. 2015 Jan;27:138–144. DOI:10.1002/adma.201403943. PubMed PMID: WOS:000347239600019; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace J, Wang MO, Thompson P, et al. Validating continuous digital light processing (cDLP) additive manufacturing accuracy and tissue engineering utility of a dye-initiator package. Biofabrication. 2014 Mar;6: Artn 015003. DOI:10.1088/1758-5082/6/1/015003. PubMed PMID: WOS:000332844400003; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MH, Hou LT, Tu CY, et al. Promotion of cell affinity of porous PLLA scaffolds by immobilization of RGD peptides via plasma treatment. Macromol Biosci. 2006 Jan 5;6:90–98. DOI:10.1002/mabi.200500130. PubMed PMID: WOS:000234675400011; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PK, Chen JY, Wang LP, et al. Plasma-surface modification of biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2002 Mar 29;36:143–206. DOI:10.1016/S0927-796x(02)00004-9. Pii S0927-796x(02)00004-9. PubMed PMID: WOS:000174818200001; English.10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-M, Yang S-W, Jung S-C, et al. Oxygen plasma treatment on 3D-printed chitosan/gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;17:2747–2750. DOI:10.1166/jnn.2017.13337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park YO, Myung SW, Kook MS, et al. Cell proliferation on macro/nano surface structure and collagen immobilization of 3D polycaprolactone scaffolds. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016 Feb;16:1415–1419. PubMed PMID: 27433597.10.1166/jnn.2016.11920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier DD, Lathi VK, Gerhart TN, et al. Ex vivo degradation of a poly(propylene glycol-fumarate) biodegradable particulate composite bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Jun 5;35:383–389. PubMed PMID: 9138072.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan PX, Lee JW, Seol YJ, et al. Development of 3D PPF/DEF scaffolds using micro-stereolithography and surface modification. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Jan;20:271–279. DOI:10.1007/s10856-008-3567-2. PubMed PMID: 18763023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee IH, Cho DW. Micro-stereolithography photopolymer solidification patterns for various laser beam exposure conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2003 Oct;22:410–416. DOI:10.1007/s00170-003-1538-9. PubMed PMID: WOS:000186247100012; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong YW, Shoichet MS. Peptide surface modification of poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) enhances its interaction with central nervous system neurons. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Oct;42:85–95. PubMed PMID: 9740010.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi S, Jafari Y, Moztarzadeh F, et al. Evaluation of effective parameters for the synthesis of poly(propylene fumarate) by response surface methodology. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014 Oct 15;131: Artn 40932. DOI:10.1002/App.40932. PubMed PMID: WOS:000340239000047; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Ahn G, Kim JY, et al. Evaluating cell proliferation based on internal pore size and 3D scaffold architecture fabricated using solid freeform fabrication technology. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010 Dec;21:3195–3205. DOI:10.1007/s10856-010-4173-7. PubMed PMID: 20981473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015 Mar;1:9. Artn 4. DOI:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4. PubMed PMID: WOS:000352596900001; English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B. 2013 Dec 1;19:485–502. DOI:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437. PubMed PMID: WOS:000326962100003; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annabi N, Nichol JW, Zhong X, et al. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B. 2010 Aug;16:371–383. DOI:10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0639. PubMed PMID: WOS:000280375800001; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu XZ, Ghosh K, Liu YC, et al. Attachment and spreading of fibroblasts on an RGD peptide-modified injectable hyaluronan hydrogel. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004 Feb 1;68:365–375. DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.20002. PubMed PMID: WOS:000188710000019; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie TA, Capadona JR, Reyes CD, et al. Integrin specificity and enhanced cellular activities associated with surfaces presenting a recombinant fibronectin fragment compared to RGD supports. Biomaterials. 2006 Nov;27:5459–5470. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.027. PubMed PMID: WOS:000240611000013; English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HD, Heo J, Hwang Y, et al. Extracellular-matrix-based and Arg-Gly-Asp-modified photopolymerizing hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015 Feb;21:757–766. DOI:10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0233. PubMed PMID: 25266634; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4333611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar