Preparation and characterization of gelatin-bioactive glass ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

References

• Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science. 2002;295:1014–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D. Benefit and risk in tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2004;7:24–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan AI, Goldberg VM. Principles of tissue engineered regeneration of skeletal tissues. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 367:S12–S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi H, Ur Rehman F, Zhao C, et al. Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone Res. 2016;4:16050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou G, Mikos AG, Temenoff JS. Formation of highly porous biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. Electron J Biotechnol. 2000;3:114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg S, Langer R. Advances in tissue engineering current topics in developmental biology. vol. 61. New York: Academic Press; 2004; p. 113–134.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith L. Emerging design principles in biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;961:83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5474–5491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3413–3431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Meng Y, Wang Y, et al. A biomimetic material with a high bio-responsibility for bone reconstruction and tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed.. 2011;22:153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Zeng X, Ma C, et al. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res. 2017;5:17014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji X, Wang T, Guo L, et al. Effect of nanoscale-ZnO on the mechanical property and biocompatibility of electrospun poly(L-lactide) acid/nanoscale-ZnO mats. J Biomed Nanotechnol.. 2013;9:417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng P, Wu P, Gao C, et al. A multimaterial scaffold with tunable properties: toward bone tissue repair. Adv Sci. 2018;5:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, et al. Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells. Bone Res. 2017;5:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai C, Guo W, Wu P, et al. A graphene oxide-Ag co-dispersing nanosystem: dual synergistic effects on antibacterial activities and mechanical properties of polymer scaffolds. Chem Eng J. 2018;347:322–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Ji X, Jin L, et al. Fabrication and characterization of heparin-grafted poly- L-lactic acid-chitosan core-shell nanofibers scaffold for vascular gasket. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:3757–3763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji X, Yang W, Wang T, et al. Coaxially electrospun core/shell structured poly(L-lactide) acid/chitosan nanofibers for potential drug carrier in tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9:1672–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumbar SG, Laurencin C, Deng M. Natural and synthetic polymers. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Jones JR, Clare AG. Bio-glasses: an introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lien SM, Ko LY, Huang TJ. Effect of crosslinking temperature on compression strength of gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2010;30:631–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler M, Dombrowski F, Simon U, et al. Influence of gelatin coatings on compressive strength of porous hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2011;31:523–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Wang H, Ding Y, et al. Antibacterial 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds reinforced with genipin cross-linked gelatin for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:3367–3378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migneault I, Dartiguenave C, Bertrand MJ, et al. Glutaraldehyde: Behavior in aqueous solution, reaction with proteins, and application to enzyme crosslinking. Biotechniques. 2004;37:790–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozafari M, Moztarzadeh F, Rabiee M, et al. Development of macroporous nanocomposite scaffolds of gelatin/bioactive glass prepared through layer solvent casting combined with lamination technique for bone tissue engineering. Ceram. Int. 2010; 36:2431–2439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daemi H, Barikani M. Synthesis and characterization of calcium alginatenanoparticles, sodium homopolymannuronate salt and its calcium nanoparticles. Sci Iran. 2012;19:2023–2028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daemi H, Rajabi-Zeleti S, Sardon H, et al. A robust super-tough biodegradable elastomer engineered by supramolecular ionic interactions. Biomaterials. 2016;84:54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2011;14:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo CK, Ma PX. Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials. 2001;22:511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisson K, Zhang C, Farach-Carson MC, et al. Evaluation of cross-linking methods for electrospun gelatin on cell growth and viability. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:1675–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olde Damink L, Dijkstra P, Van Luyn M, et al. Glutaraldehyde as a crosslinking agent for collagen-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1995;6:460–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JR. Reprint of: Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2013;23:4457–4486.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro M, Ginebra MP, Planell JA. Cellular response to calcium phosphate glasses with controlled solubility. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;67A:1009–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials (Basel). 2010;3:3867–3910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahi S, Chih A, Ma C, et al. Surface transformations of bioglass 45S5 during scaffold synthesis for bone tissue engineering. Langmuir. 2013;29:1466–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J. Preparation of interconnected highly porous polymeric structures by a replication and freeze-drying process. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;67:732–740.
   Google Scholar
• Ren L, Tsuru K, Hayakawa S, et al. Novel approach to fabricate porous gelatin-siloxane hybrids for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4765–4773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madihally S, Matthew H. Porous chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1133–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang HW, Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Fabrication of porous gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1339–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whang K, Goldstick T, Healy K. A biodegradable polymer scaffold for delivery of osteotropic factors. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2545–2551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Bera J. Sol–gel synthesis and in vitro bioactivity of glass–ceramics in SiO2–CaO–Na2O–P2O5 system. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2016;80:411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27:2907–2915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing KA. Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: Influence of porosity and chemistry. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2005;2:184–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannink G, Arts J. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: What is optimal for bone regeneration? Injury. 2011;42:S22–S25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lao J, Dieudonné X, Benbakkar M, et al. Bioactive glass coating on gelatin scaffolds at ambient temperature: easy route to make polymer scaffolds become bioactive. J Mater Sci. 2017;52:9129–9139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozafari M, Rabiee M, Azami M, et al. Biomimetic formation of apatite on the surface of porous gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds. Appl Surf Sci 2010;257:1740–1749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Višnjić D, Lalić H, Dembitz V, et al. Metabolism and differentiation. Period Biol. 2014;116:37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciotti I, Lombardi M, Bianco A, et al. Sol–gel derived 45S5 bioglass: synthesis, microstructural evolution and thermal behaviour. J Mater Sci Mater Med.. 2012;23:1849–1866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JR. Bioglasses: an introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, et al. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1971;5:117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Duan S, Yang X, Mei F, et al. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on poly(L-lactide) nanofibrous scaffolds containing carbon nanomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2015;103:1424–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, et al. Surface characteristics of dental implants: a review. Dent Mater. 2018;34:40–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard T, Cooper J. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science. 2009;326:1208–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu YL, Liang HL, Hung CH, et al. Syringetin, a flavonoid derivative in grape and wine, induces human osteoblast differentiation through bone morphogenetic protein-2/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:1452–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade Â, Valério P, Goes A, et al. Influence of morphology on in vitro compatibility of bioactive glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2006;352:3508–3511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung G, Park Y, Han J. Effects of HA released calcium ion on osteoblast differentiation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:1649–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LDK, et al. Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276:461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory CA, Gunn WG, Peister A, et al. An Alizain red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: Comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal Biochem. 2004;329:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varanasi VG, Owyoung JB, Saiz E, et al. The ionic products of bioactive glass particle dissolution enhance periodontal ligament fibroblast osteocalcin expression and enhance early mineralized tissue development. J Biomed Mater Res. 2011;98A:177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar