Facile synthesis of 3D silk fibroin scaffolds with tunable properties for regenerative medicine

References

• Hussey GS, Dziki JL, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3(7):159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui JH, Ostrovsky-Snider NA, Yama DMP, et al. Conductive silk-polypyrrole composite scaffolds with bioinspired nanotopographic cues for cardiac tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(44):7185–7196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong N, Dong T, Chen Z, et al. A novel 3D-printed silk fibroin-based scaffold facilitates tracheal epithelium proliferation in vitro. J Biomater Appl. 2019;34(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanty S, Larsen LB, Trifol J, et al. Fabrication of scalable and structured tissue engineering scaffolds using water dissolvable sacrificial 3D printed moulds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;55:569–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeisdasteh Hokmabad V, Davaran S, Ramazani A, et al. Design and fabrication of porous biodegradable scaffolds: a strategy for tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017;28(16):1797–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal N, Khan AS, Asif A, et al. Recent concepts in biodegradable polymers for tissue engineering paradigms: a critical review. Int Mater Rev. 2019;64(2):91–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Luo J, Zhao X, et al. Electrospun homogeneous silk fibroin/poly (varepsilon-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffolds by addition of acetic acid for tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl. 2016;31(3):421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, et al. Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(4):457–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Cao C, Ma X, et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation behavior of aqueous-derived electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds. Polym Degrad Stab. 2010;95(9):1679–1685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Cao C, Ma X. A novel three-dimensional tubular scaffold prepared from silk fibroin by electrospinning. Int J Biol Macromol. 2009;45(5):504–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniglio D, Bonani W, Migliaresi C, et al. Silk fibroin porous scaffolds by N2O foaming. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(5):491–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Lu G, Liu S, et al. Nanoscale control of silks for nanofibrous scaffold formation with improved porous structure. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(17):2622–2633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZS, Ding ZZ, Huang JW, et al. Green process to prepare water-insoluble silk scaffolds with silk I structure. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;117:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei Y, Liu X, Liu S, et al. A mild process to design silk scaffolds with reduced beta-sheet structure and various topographies at the nanometer scale. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Cao C, Ma X, et al. Optimization of macroporous 3-D silk fibroin scaffolds by salt-leaching procedure in organic solvent-free conditions. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(2):315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zuo Y, Wen S, et al. Distinctive stress-stiffening responses of regenerated silk fibroin protein polymers under nanoscale gap geometries: effect of shear on silk fibroin-based materials. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(4):1223–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MC, Kim DK, Lee OJ, et al. Fabrication of silk fibroin film using centrifugal casting technique for corneal tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2016;104(3):508–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Guo J, Liu Y, et al. A comparative study on properties of cellulose/antarctic krill protein composite fiber by centrifugal spinning and wet spinning. Fibers Polym. 2019;20(8):1547–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer A, Horbelt N, Nijemeisland M, et al. Shear-induced beta-crystallite unfolding in condensed phase nanodroplets promotes fiber formation in a biological adhesive. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):4992–5001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, David Kaplan A, Cebe P. Determining beta-sheet crystallinity in fibrous proteins by thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 2006;39(18):6161–6170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang Y, Li M, Liu J, et al. Biomimetic silk scaffolds with an amorphous structure for soft tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(11):9290–9300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues EM, Cornelio ALG, Godoi PH, et al. Heparin is biocompatible and can induce differentiation of human dental pulp cells. Int Endod J. 2019;52(6):829–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seib FP, Herklotz M, Burke KA, et al. Multifunctional silk-heparin biomaterials for vascular tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Ma X, Cao C, et al. Multifunctional iron oxide/silk-fibroin (Fe3O4–SF) composite microspheres for the delivery of cancer therapeutics. RSC Adv. 2014;4(78):41572–41577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Cao C, Zhu H. The biocompatibility of silk fibroin films containing sulfonated silk fibroin. J Biomed Mater Res. 2006;78B(1):89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Wang K, Mei J, et al. Fabrication of highly interconnected porous silk fibroin scaffolds for potential use as vascular grafts. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(5):2014–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarov R, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5(3):718–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Zheng Y, Cheng Y, et al. In vitro corrosion and biocompatibility of binary magnesium alloys. Biomaterials. 2009;30(4):484–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Sun L, Zhang Z, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds for potential application in bone regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2020:1–15. doi:10.1080/09205063.2020.1735607.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Liu XL, Xi TF, et al. A novel pseudo-protein-based biodegradable coating for magnesium substrates: in vitro corrosion phenomena and cytocompatibility. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3(5):878–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Zhao Y, Wang J, et al. Preparation of sulfonated silk fibroin for anti-coagulation material. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(14):1701–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang IK, Kwon OH, Lee YM, et al. Preparation and surface characterization of functional group-grafted and heparin-immobilized polyurethanes by plasma glow discharge. Biomaterials. 1996;17(8):841–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi P, Zhang L, Tian W, et al. Preparation and anticoagulant activity of functionalised silk fibroin. Chem Eng Sci. 2019;199:240–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadepalli S, Hamper H, Park SH, et al. Adsorption behavior of silk fibroin on amphiphilic graphene oxide. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(7):1084–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z-H, Wang L, Dai H-L, et al. Fabrication, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of biomimetic silk fibroin porous scaffolds via supercritical CO2 technology. J Supercrit Fluids. 2019;150:86–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R, Lian X, Shen Y, et al. Calcium sulfate bone cements with nanoscaled silk fibroin as inducer. J Biomed Mater Res. 2019;107(8):2611–2619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamada Y. New process to form a silk fibroin porous 3-D structure. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(6):3100–3106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Hao Y, Yang G, et al. Hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility of the hirudin-modified silk fibroin. J Biomed Mater Res. 2015;103(3):556–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktay B, Kayaman-Apohan N, Suleymanoglu M, et al. Zwitterionic phosphorylcholine grafted chitosan nanofiber: preparation, characterization and in-vitro cell adhesion behavior. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;73:569–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar