Tumor-targeting and imaging micelles for pH-triggered anticancer drug release and combined photodynamic therapy

References

• Li H, Du J, Liu J, et al. Smart superstructures with ultrahigh pH-sensitivity for targeting acidic tumor microenvironment: instantaneous size switching and improved tumor penetration. ACS Nano. 2016;10(7):6753–6761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Hu Q, Xu C, et al. Co-delivery of doxorubicin and interferon-γ by thermosensitive nanoparticles for cancer immunochemotherapy. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2018;15(9):4161–4172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen X, He D, et al. Surface-modified nanoerythrocyte loading DOX for targeted liver cancer chemotherapy. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2018; 15(12):5728–5740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Huang P, Chen X. Stimuli-responsive programmed specific targeting in nanomedicine. ACS Nano. 2016;10(3):2991–2994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymaruk MJ, Hunter SJ, O’Brien CT, et al. RAFT dispersion polymerization in silicone oil. Macromolecules. 2019;52(7):2822–2832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee. Advanced Healthcare Materials 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kouser R, Vashist A, Zafaryab M, et al. pH-responsive biocompatible nanocomposite hydrogels for therapeutic drug delivery. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(6):1810–1822.
   Google Scholar
• Feng N, Yang M, Feng X, et al. Reduction-responsive polypeptide nanogel for intracellular drug delivery in relieving collagen-induced arthritis. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(12):4154–4162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chytil P, Šírová M, Kudláčová J, et al. Bloodstream stability predetermines the antitumor efficacy of micellar polymer-doxorubicin drug conjugates with pH-triggered drug release. Mol Pharm. 2018;15(9):3654–3663.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou Z, Shen Y, Tang J, et al. Charge-reversal drug conjugate for targeted cancer cell nuclear drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19(22):3580–3589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shae D, Becker K, Christov WP, et al. Endosomolytic polymersomes increase the activity of cyclic dinucleotide STING agonists to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14(3):269–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Yang G, Gai S, et al. Multifunctional theranostics for dual-modal photodynamic synergistic therapy via stepwise water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(8):6829–6838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang W, Fan W, Wang Z, et al. Acidity/reducibility dual-responsive hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoplatforms for tumor-specific self-assembly and synergistic therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(12):12269–12283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhang P, Xu J, et al. NIR-absorbing dye functionalized supramolecular vesicles for chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(1):70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Cheng L, Liu YM, et al. Imaging - guided pH - sensitive photodynamic therapy using charge reversible up conversion nano particles under near - infrared light. Adv Funct Mater. 2013; 23(24):3077– 3086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian B, Wang C, Zhang S, et al. Photothermally enhanced photodynamic therapy delivered by nano-graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):7000–7009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Song F, Shi W, et al. Nitroreductase-activatable theranostic molecules with high PDT efficiency under mild hypoxia based on a TADF fluorescein derivative. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(17):15426–15435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh H-P, del Valle AC, Syu M-C, et al. A new photosensitized oxidation-responsive nanoplatform for controlled drug release and photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(25):21160–21172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (a) Zhaoxu Meng,Liping Zhang, Zhonggui He, and He Lian. Mucosal penetrating bioconjugate coated upconverting nanoparticles that integrate biological tracking and photodynamic therapy for gastrointestinal cancer treatment. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018, 4(6), 2203–2212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  (b) Bin Du, Xiaosa Yan, Xiaoyu Ding, Qinghui Wang, Qian Du, TianguoXu, GuopengShen, Hanchun Yao, and Jie Zhou. Oxygen self-production red blood cell carrier system for MRI mediated cancer therapy: ferryl-hb, sonodynamic, and chemical therapy. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2018, 4 (12), 4132–4143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo - Villagrán M, et al. Photosensitizers Used in the Photodynamic Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:3339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (a) Sakkarapalayam M. Mahalingam, Josue D. Ordaz, and Philip S. Low. Targeting of a photosensitizer to the mitochondrion enhances the potency of photodynamic therapy. ACS Omega. 2018, 3(6), 6066–6074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  (b) Srivalleesha Mallidi, Sriram Anbil, Anne-Laure Bulin, Girgis Obaid, Megumi Ichikawa, and Tayyaba Hasan. Beyond the barriers of light penetration: strategies, perspectives and possibilities for photodynamic therapy, Theranostics. 2016, 6(13), 2458–2487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy M, Courtney CM, Chowdhury PP, et al. Assessing different reactive oxygen species as potential antibiotics: selectivity of intracellular superoxide generation using quantum dots. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(2):529–537.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Quan Y, Yu Y-L, et al. Graphene quantum dot/silver nanoparticle hybrids with oxidase activities for antibacterial application. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(3):313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra P, Dutta D, Das S, et al. Antibacterial and photocatalytic properties of ZnO-9-aminoacridine hydrochloride hydrate drug nanoconjugates. ACS Omega. 2018;3(7):7962–7970..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang H, Wang H, et al. Nonviolent self-catabolic DNAzyme nanosponges for smart anticancer drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):5852–5863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Ono RJ, Yang C, et al. Dual pH-responsive shell-cleavable polycarbonate micellar nanoparticles for in vivo anticancer drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(23):19355–19364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Wang J, Tao W, et al. Redox-responsive polyphosphoester-based micellar nanomedicines for overriding chemoresistance in breast cancer cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(47):26315–26325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Chang Z, Khan N, et al. Nanosizing noncrystalline and porous silica material—naturally occurring opal shale for systemic tumor targeting drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(31):25994–26004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen M, Li S, et al. Targeted delivery of a ligand–drug conjugate via formyl peptide receptor 1 through cholesterol-dependent endocytosis. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2019;16(6):2636–2647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Jia L, Wang Q, et al. pH/Redox Dual-responsive polyplex with effective endosomal escape for codelivery of siRNA and doxorubicin against drug-resistant cancer cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(18):16296–16310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Zhang C, Wu J, et al. PEG-detachable polymeric micelles self-assembled from amphiphilic copolymers for tumor-acidity-triggered drug delivery and controlled release. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(6):5701–5713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshayes S, Cabral H, Ishii T, et al. Phenylboronic acid-installed polymeric micelles for targeting sialylated epitopes in solid tumors. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(41):15501–15507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar