Porous aligned ZnSr-doped β-TCP/silk fibroin scaffolds using ice-templating method for bone tissue engineering applications

References

• Caliari SR, Harley BAC. The effect of anisotropic collagen-GAG scaffolds and growth Factor supplementation on tendon cell recruitment, alignment, and metabolic activity. Biomaterials. 2011;32(23):5330–5340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damania D, Subramanian H, Tiwari AK, et al. Role of cytoskeleton in controlling the disorder strength of cellular nanoscale architecture. Biophys J. 2010;99(3):989–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Hussain I, Brust M, et al. Aligned two- and three-dimensional structures by directional freezing of polymers and nanoparticles. Nat Mater. 2005;4(10):787–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport RJ. What controls organ regeneration. Science. 2005;309(5731):84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca A, Longoni A, Criscenti G, et al. Toward mimicking the bone structure: design of novel hierarchical scaffolds with a tailored radial porosity gradient. Biofabrication. 2016;8(4):045007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KD, Duck TR, King GJW, et al. Mechanical properties of subchondral cancellous bone of the radial head. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(4):285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys. 1998;20(2):92–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. CJASN. 2008;3(Suppl 3):S131–S139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl DA, Czernuszka JT. Collagen-hydroxyapatite composites for hard tissue repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2006;11:43–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Wu X, Chen J, et al. The development of collagen based composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(1):129–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sai Y, Shiwaku Y, Anada T, et al. Capacity of octacalcium phosphate to promote osteoblastic differentiation toward osteocytes in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2018;69:362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hare P, Meenan BJ, Burke GA, et al. Biological responses to hydroxyapatite surfaces deposited via a co-incident microblasting technique. Biomaterials. 2010;31(3):515–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Fielding G, Tarafder S, et al. Understanding of dopant-induced osteogenesis and angiogenesis in calcium phosphate ceramics. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31(10):594–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy M, Fielding GA, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. Effects of zinc and strontium substitution in tricalcium phosphate on osteoclast differentiation and resorption. Biomater Sci. 2013;1(1):74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina S, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Natural-based nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: a review. Adv Mater. 2015;27(7):1143–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro VP, Pina S, Costa JB, et al. Enzymatically cross-linked silk fibroin-based hierarchical scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(4):3781–3799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina S, Canadas RF, Jiménez G, et al. Biofunctional ionic-doped calcium phosphates: silk fibroin composites for bone tissue engineering scaffolding. Cells Tissues Organs. 2017;204(3–4):150–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro VP, Pina S, Canadas RF, et al. In vivo performance of hierarchical HRP-crosslinked silk fibroin/β-TCP scaffolds for osteochondral tissue regeneration. Regen Med Front. 2019;1:e190007.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T, et al. Materials fabrication from bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(10):1612–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8–9):991–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann S, Hilbe M, Fajardo RJ, et al. Remodeling of tissue-engineered bone structures in vivo. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;85(1):119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partlow BP, Hanna CW, Rnjak-Kovacina J, et al. Highly tunable elastomeric silk biomaterials. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24(29):4615–4624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro VP, da Silva Morais A, Maia FR, Canadas RF, et al. Combinatory approach for developing silk fibroin scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2018;72:167–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Alessandrino A, et al. Silk fibroin derived polypeptide-induced biomineralization of collagen. Biomaterials. 2012;33(1):102–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, et al. Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells. Bone Res. 2017;5:17059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez MC, Ferrer ML, del Monte F. Ice-templated materials: sophisticated structures exhibiting enhanced functionalities obtained after unidirectional freezing and ice-segregation-induced self-assembly. Chem Mater. 2008;20(3):634–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annabi N, Nichol JW, Zhong X, et al. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(4):371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen A, Princ A, Korus G, et al. A biomaterial with a channel-like pore architecture induces endochondral healing of bone defects. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan L-P, Oliveira JM, Oliveira AL, et al. Macro/microporous silk fibroin scaffolds with potential for articular cartilage and meniscus tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(1):289–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina S, Vieira S, Rego P, et al. Biological responses of brushite-forming Zn- and ZnSr- substituted beta-tricalcium phosphate bone cements. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;20:162–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadas RF, Ren T, Tocchio A, et al. Tunable anisotropic networks for 3-D oriented neural tissue models. Biomaterials. 2018;181:402–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadas RF, Ren T, Marques AP, et al. Biochemical gradients to generate 3D heterotypic-like tissues with isotropic and anisotropic architectures. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(48):1804148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley BA, Hastings AZ, Yannas IV, et al. Fabricating tubular scaffolds with a radial pore size gradient by a spinning technique. Biomaterials. 2006;27(6):866–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YM, Shin HJ, Yang DH, et al. Advanced capability of radially aligned fibrous scaffolds coated with polydopamine for guiding directional migration of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5(44):8725–8737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotti KL, Dunand DC. Freeze casting – a review of processing, microstructure and properties via the open data repository, freezecasting. Net Prog Mater Sci. 2018;94:243–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabilo-Munizaga G, Barbosa-Cánovas GV. Rheology for the food industry. J Food Eng. 2005;67(1–2):147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Zuidema JM, Rivet CJ, Gilbert RJ, et al. A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(5):1063–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, O'Brien FJ. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adh Migr. 2010;4(3):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, et al. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1970;4(3):433–456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klawitter JJ, Bagwell JG, Weinstein AM, et al. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976;10(2):311–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AC, Arns CH, Sheppard AP, et al. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using micro-CT. Biomaterials. 2007;28(15):2491–2504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5474–5491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarov R, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5(3):718–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuruga E, Takita H, Itoh H, et al. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J Biochem. 1997;121(2):317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantila Roosa SM, Kemppainen JM, Moffitt EN, et al. The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92(1):359–368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elema H, de Groot JH, Nijenhuis AJ, et al. Use of porous biodegradable polymer implants in meniscus reconstruction. 2) Biological evaluation of porous biodegradable polymer implants in menisci. Colloid Polymer Sci. 1990;268(12):1082–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Wu CAM, Rengarajan V, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv Mater. 2011;23(37):4254–4260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurkan UA, Fan Y, Xu F, et al. Simple precision creation of digitally specified, spatially heterogeneous, engineered tissue architectures. Adv Mater. 2013;25(8):1192–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg E, Rindone A, Dorafshar A, et al. Comparison of 3D-printed poly-ϵ-caprolactone scaffolds functionalized with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bio-Oss, or decellularized bone matrix. Tissue Eng - Part A. 2017;23(11–12):503–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun I, Han HS, Edwards JR, et al. Electrospun fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering: viewpoints on architecture and fabrication. IJMS. 2018;19(3):745.
   Google Scholar
• Chocholata P, Kulda V, Babuska V. Fabrication of scaffolds for bone-tissue regeneration. Materials. 2019;12(4):568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmora S, Glicklis R, Cohen S. Tailoring the pore architecture in 3-D alginate scaffolds by controlling the freezing regime during fabrication. Biomaterials. 2002;23(20):4087–4094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Zhang D, Wang ZL, et al. Preparation of porous nanocomposite scaffolds with honeycomb monolith structure by one phase solution freezedrying method. Chin J Polym Sci. 2011;29(2):215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reys LL, Silva SS, Pirraco RP, et al. Influence of freezing temperature and deacetylation degree on the performance of freeze-dried chitosan scaffolds towards cartilage tissue engineering. Eur Polym J. 2017;95:232–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang C, Jiang W, et al. Influence of stage cooling method on pore architecture of biomimetic alginate scaffolds. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring K. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Kerns DG. Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review. Open Dent J. 2014;8:56–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller KP, Gaspar D, Delgado LM, et al. Influence of porosity and pore shape on structural, mechanical and biological properties of poly ϵ-caprolactone electro-spun fibrous scaffolds. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2016;11(9):1031–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro VP, Silva-Correia J, Gonçalves C, et al. Rapidly responsive silk fibroin hydrogels as an artificial matrix for the programmed tumor cells death. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0194441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaully T, Siegmann A, Shacham D. Rheology of highly filled natural CaCo3 composites. II. Effects of solid loading and particle size distribution on rotational rheometry. Polym Compos. 2007;28(4):524–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang B, Bártolo PJ. Rheological characterization of polymer/ceramic blends for 3D printing of bone scaffolds. Polym Test. 2018;68:365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maji K, Dasgupta S, Pramanik K, et al. Preparation and evaluation of gelatin-chitosan-nanobioglass 3D porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9825659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler EA. Protein adsorption in three dimensions. Biomaterials. 2012;33(5):1201–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, Becherer T, Angioletti-Uberti S, et al. Protein interactions with polymer coatings and biomaterials. Angew Chem. 2014;.
   Google Scholar
• D’Elia NL, Gravina N, Ruso JM, et al. Albumin-mediated deposition of bone-like apatite onto nano-sized surfaces: effect of surface reactivity and interfacial hydration. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta A, Migliaresi C, Lloyd AW, et al. Serum protein absorption on silk fibroin fibers and films: surface opsonization and binding strength. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2002;17(1):23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal BB, Gil ES, Panilaitis B, et al. Laminar silk scaffolds for aligned tissue fabrication. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13(1):48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar