Cryogenic 3D printing of modified polylactic acid scaffolds with biomimetic nanofibrous architecture for bone tissue engineering

References

• Koons GL, Diba M, Mikos AG. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5(8):584–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entezari A, Swain MV, Gooding JJ, et al. A modular design strategy to integrate mechanotransduction concepts in scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2020;118:100–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao SJ, Zhao Y, Hu YM, et al. New perspectives: in-situ tissue engineering for bone repair scaffold. Compos B - Eng. 2020;202:108445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyedsalehi A, Daneshmandi L, Barajaa M, et al. Fabrication and characterization of mechanically competent 3D printed polycaprolactone-reduced graphene oxide scaffolds. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaquette C, Bock N, Tran PA. Layered antimicrobial selenium nanoparticle-calcium phosphate coating on 3D printed scaffolds enhanced bone formation in critical size defects. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(50):55638–55648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Jia WB, Zhang XL, et al. Hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides modified mineralized collagen and chitosan with enhanced osteoinductive properties for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;260:117780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli N, Sharma V, Orera A, et al. Pro-angiogenic and osteogenic composite scaffolds of fibrin, alginate and calcium phosphate for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng. 2021;12(2):204173142110056.
   Google Scholar
• Rajabi A, Esmaeili A. Preparation of three-phase nanocomposite antimicrobial scaffold BCP/gelatin/45S5 glass with drug vancomycin and BMP-2 loading for bone regeneration. Colloids Surf A - Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2020;606:125508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moura NK, Martins EF, Oliveira RLMS, et al. Synergistic effect of adding bioglass and carbon nanotubes on poly (lactic acid) porous membranes for guided bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;117:111327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana DS, Maya K, Maria P, et al. Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems. Chem Eng J. 2018;340:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saed AB, Behravesh AH, Hasannia S, et al. An in vitro study on the key features of poly L-lactic acid/biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated via DLP 3D printing for bone grafting. Eur Polym J. 2020;141:110057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath UG, Ching YC, Chuah CH, et al. Fabrication of porous materials from natural/synthetic biopolymers and their composites. Materials. 2016;9(12):991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavia FC, Conoscenti G, Greco S, et al. Preparation, characterization and in vitro test of composites poly-lactic acid/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;119:945–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao X, Zhang HC, He T. Preparation of porous biodegradable polymer and its nanocomposites by supercritical CO2 foaming for tissue engineering. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosal K, Agatemor C, Spitalsky Z, et al. Electrospinning tissue engineering and wound dressing scaffolds from polymer-titanium dioxide nanocomposites. Chem Eng J. 2019;358:1262–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Liu J, Ma WB, et al. Degradable calcium deficient hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic-glycolic acid copolymer) bilayer scaffold through integral molding 3D printing for bone defect repair. Biofabrication. 2021;13(2):025005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo T, Noshin M, Baker HB, et al. 3D printed biofunctionalized scaffolds for microfracture repair of cartilage defects. Biomaterials. 2018;185:219–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Ke DX, Sahasrabudhe H, et al. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;93:45–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu DH, Nie W, Li DJ, et al. 3D printed PCL/SrHA scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2019;362:269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yang GJ, Johnson BN, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Acta Biomater. 2019;84:16–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Yin HM, Li X, et al. Simultaneously constructing nanotopographical and chemical cues in 3D-printed polylactic acid scaffolds to promote bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;118:111457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang BQ, Wang L, Song P, et al. 3D printed bone tissue regenerative PLA/HA scaffolds with comprehensive performance optimizations. Mater Des. 2021;201:109490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Yang H, Li S, et al. Multivalent polyanionic 2D nanosheets functionalized nanofibrous stem cell-based neural scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(20):2010145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao QL, Zhou Y, Wang M. Three-dimensional endothelial cell incorporation within bioactive nanofibrous scaffolds through concurrent emulsion electrospinning and coaxial cell electrospraying. Acta Biomater. 2021;123:312–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Yi BC, Wang XL, et al. Understanding the cellular responses based on low-density electrospun fiber networks. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;119:111470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, He ZH, Xu GJ, et al. Fabrication and characterization of modified nanofibrous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation technique and aminolysis for promoting cyctocompatibility. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2016;27(10):1058–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Guo RY, Xie CL, et al. Biomimetic mineralization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatites on aminated modified polylactic acid microspheres to develop a novel drug delivery system for alendronate. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;110:110655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo RY, Chen SY, Xiao XF. Fabrication and characterization of poly (ethylenimine) modified poly (L-lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019;30(16):1523–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Wang JG, Li X, et al. Facile preparation of bioactive nanoparticle/poly(e-caprolactone) hierarchical porous scaffolds via 3D printing of high internal phase pickering emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;545:104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan S, Mathew AP. 3D printed scaffolds with gradient porosity based on a cellulose nanocrystal hydrogel. Nanoscale. 2018;10(9):4421–4431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Luo Z, Wu LZ, et al. Modified poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres with nanofibrous structure suitable for biomedical application. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2018;67(9):572–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puchalski M, Kwolek S, Szparaga G, et al. Investigation of the influence of PLA molecular structure on the crystalline forms (a' and a) and mechanical properties of wet spinning fibers. Polymers. 2017;9(12):18.
   Google Scholar
• Amnieh SK, Mosaddegh P, Mashayekhi M, et al. Biodegradation evaluation of poly(lactic acid) for stent application: role of mechanical tension and temperature. J Appl Polym Sci. 2021;138(19):e50389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar