Cationic cellulose nanocrystals as sustainable green material for multi biological applications via ξ potential

References

• Shaoni S, Shaolong S, Xuefei C, et al. The role of pretreatment in improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials. Bioresour Technol. 2016;199:49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabra AB, Bernardes JS, Favaro WJ, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals as carriers in medicine and their toxicities: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:514–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra RK, Sabu A, Tiwari SK. Materials chemistry and the futurist eco friendly applications of nanocellulose: status and prospect. Saudi Chem Soc. 2018;22(8):949–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali HT, Ezatollah A, Shokoofeh G, et al. Cellulose nanomaterials-binding properties and applications: a review. Molecules. 2018;23:2684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöström E. 2013. Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fontes A, Fernandes HP, de Thomaz AA, et al. 2007. Studying red blood cell agglutination by measuring electrical and mechanical properties with a double optical tweezers. In J. Popp and G. von Bally, editors. Biophotonics 2007: Optics in Life Science, Proceedings of SPIE-OSA Biomedical Optics, Vol. 6633. Washington: Optica Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Halib N, et al. Potential applications of nanocellulose-containing materials in the biomedical field. Materials (Basel). 2017;21;10(8):977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Lastra CA, Villegas I. Resveratrol as an antioxidant and pro-oxidant agent: mechanisms and clinical implications. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 5):1156–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimaa KA, Sara MM, Samar SE, et al. Phytochemical screening and characterization of the antioxidant, anti-proliferative and antibacterial effects of different extracts of Opuntia ficus-indica peel. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022;34(7):102216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yosif A, et al. Development of nanocubosomes co-loaded with dual anticancer agents curcumin and temozolomide for effective colon cancer therapy. Drug Deliver. 2022;29(1):2633–2643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal H, Razzaq A, Uzair B, et al. Breast cancer inhibition by biosynthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles is comparable to free doxorubicin but appeared safer in BALB/c mice. Materials. 2021;14(12):3155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacakova L, Julia P, Maria T, et al. Applications of nanocellulose/nanocarbon composites: focus on biotechnology and medicine. Nanomaterials 2020;10(2):196. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020196
   Google Scholar
• Rambabu N, Panthapulakkal S, Sain M, et al. Production of nanocellulose fibers from pine cone biomass: evaluation and optimization of chemical and mechanical treatment conditions on mechanical properties of nanocellulose films. Indus Crop Product. 2016;83:746–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Chongxing H, Hui Z, et al. Effects of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibers on the structure and properties of polyhydroxybutyrate nanocomposites. Polymers Basel. 2019;11:2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesham M, Fawzy SM, Mahmoud M, et al. Production of zinc and copper as nanoparticles by green synthesis using Pseudomonas fluorescens. Pak J Biol Sci. 2021;24(4):445–453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayache J, Beaunier L, Boumendil J, et al. 2010. Sample preparation handbook for transmission electron microscopy, 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.12691/ijp-4-5-3
   Google Scholar
• Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(2):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Peng-Cheng L, Run L, et al. Dual AO/EB staining to detect apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells compared with flow cytometry. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015;21:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SM, Barakat OS, Kotram LE. Stimulation the immune response through ξ potential on core–shell ‘calcium oxide/magnetite iron oxides’ nanoparticles. Anim Biotechnol. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2111310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repetto G, Peso A, Zurita J. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(7):1125–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishaq L, Hillary M, Liang J, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals in cancer diagnostics and treatment. J Controlled Release. 2021;336:207–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yedjou CG, Tchounwou PB. In-vitro cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of arsenic trioxide on human leukemia (HL-60) cells using the MTT and alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assays. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;301(1-2):123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou YA, Chen FW. Quantitation of DNA fragmentation in apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(5):992–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armonk. 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Orasugh JT, Saha NR, Sarkar G, et al. A facile comparative approach towards utilization of waste cotton lint for the synthesis of nano-crystalline cellulose crystals along with acid recovery. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;109:1246–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani K, Gomathi T, Vijayalakshmi K, et al. Banana fiber cellulose nano crystals grafted with butyl acrylate for heavy metal lead (II) removal. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;131:461–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandi N, Shirish HS, Kishore KA. Synthesis of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) from cotton using ultrasound-assisted acid hydrolysis. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;70:105353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repetto G, Sanz P. Neutral red uptake, cellular growth and lysosomal function: in vitro effects of 24 metals. Altern Lab Anim. 1993;21(4):501–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaijanen L, Paakkunainen M, Pietarinen S, et al. Ultraviolet detection of monosaccharides: multiple wave-length strategy to evaluate results after capillary zoneelectrophoretic separation. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2015;10:2950–2961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos A. The UV spectra of cellulose and some model compounds. J Appl Polym Sci. 1972;16(10):2567–2576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orelma H, Hokkanen A, Leppänen I, et al. Optical cellulose fiber made from regenerated cellulose and cellulose acetate for water sensor applications. Cellulose. 2020;27(3):1543–1553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowen JW, Hunt CM, Plyler EK. Absorption spectra in the detection of chemical changes in cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Textile Res J. 1947;17(9):504–511.
   Google Scholar
• Afshari G, Ziyadi H. Preparation of cellulose nanoparticle from cinnamon. Nanoanalysis. 2018;5:84–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R, Wu C, Xu H. Particle size and zeta potential of carbon black in liquid media. Carbon. 2007;45(14):2806–2809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik M, Li AY, Hudson R, et al. Reversing aggregation: direct synthesis of nanocatalysts from bulk metal cellulose nanocrystals as active support to access efcient hydrogenation silver nanocatalysts. Green Chem. 2016;18(1):129–133.1281C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq A, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals applications in health, medicine and catalysis. J Polym Environ. 2021;29:2062–2071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, et al. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(7):3941–3994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, et al. Microfibrillated cellulose-its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(2):735–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juanjuan L, Ruitao C, Kaiwen M, et al. Nanocellulose-based antibacterial materials. Adv Healthcare Mater J. 2018;7(20): 1800334.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Khalil HP, Bhat AH, Ireana AF. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(2):963–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim K, Wageeh A, Alaitz E, et al. Nanoantioxidants: recent trends in antioxidant. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(1):24. 10.3390/antiox9010024
   Google Scholar
• Criado P, Carole F, Stephane S, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant cellulose nanocrystals and applications in gellan gum films. Indus Biotechnol. 2015;11(1):59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Park PJ, Je JY, Kim SK. Free radical scavenging activity of hitooligosaccharides by electron spin resonance spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(16):4624–4627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie WM, Xu PX, Liu Q. Antioxidant activity of water-soluble chitosan derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2001;11(13):1699–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Zhu Y, Xie J, et al. Antioxidant activity of N-acyl chitosan oligosaccharide with same substituting degree. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21(2):798–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David P, Kevin L, John K, et al. A review of nanocellulose as a novel vehicle for drug delivery. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 2014;29(1):105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed B, Nagendra Prasad MN, Dhananjaya BL, et al. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by endosymbiont Pseudomonas fluorescens CA 417 and their bactericidal activity. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2016;95:128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plackett D, Letchford K, Jackson J, et al. A review of nanocellulose as a novel vehicle for drug delivery. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 2014;29(1):105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bideau B, Bras J, Saini S, et al. Mechanical and antibacterial properties of a nanocellulose-polypyrrole multilayer composite. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;69:977–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming L, Xiaohong L, Ning L, et al. Effect of surface wettability on the antibacterial activity of nanocellulose-based material with quaternary ammonium groups. Colloid Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspect. 2018;554:122–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trache D, Ahmed FT, Mehdi D, et al. Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced applications. Front Chem. 2020;8(392):392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen S, Guo Y, Chen S, et al. Fabrication of Cu/TiO2 nanocomposite toward an enhanced antibacterial performance in the absence of light. Mater Lett. 2012;83:154–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radovic-Moreno AF, Lu TK, Puscasu VA, et al. Surface charge-switching polymeric nanoparticles for bacterial cell wall-targeted delivery of antibiotics. ACS Nano. 2012;6(5):4279–4287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yang M, Portney NG, et al. Zeta potential: a surface electrical characteristic to probe the interaction of nanoparticles with normal and cancer human breast epithelial cells. Biomed Microdevices. 2008;10(2):321–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy D, Knapp JS, Guthrie JT, et al. Antibacterial cellulosefiber via RAFT surface graft polymerization. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(1):91–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini S, Yücel F, Belgacem MN, et al. Surface cationized cellulose nanofibrils for the production of contact active antimicrobial surfaces, carbohydr. Polym. 2016;136:239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Dong S, Hirani AA, Colacino KR, et al. Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of cellulose nanocrystals. Nano LIFE. 2012;02(03):1241006.
   Google Scholar
• Male KB, Leung ACW, Montes J, et al. Probing inhibitory effects of nanocrystalline cellulose: inhibition versus surface charge. Nanoscale. 2012;4(4):1373–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinderliter PM, Minard KR, Orr G, et al. ISDD: a computational model of particle sedimentation, diffusion and target cell dosimetry for in vitro toxicity studies. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;7(1):36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho EC, Zhang Q, Xia YN. The effect of sedimentation and diffusion on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(6):385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunasee R, Hemraz UD, Ckless K. Cellulose nanocrystals: a versatile nanoplatform for emerging biomedical applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(9):1243–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Empson YM, Emmanuel CE, Jung KH, et al. High elastic modulus nanoparticles: a novel tool for subfailure connective tissue matrix damage. Transl Res. 2014;164(3):244–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunasee R, Erinolaoluwa A, Dejhy P, et al. Cellulose nanocrystal cationic derivative induces NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent IL-1beta secretion associated with mitochondrial ROS production. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2015;4:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thangavel M, Ganapathy R, Devendrapandi S, et al. Role of surface hydrophobicity of dicationic Amphiphile-Stabilized gold nanoparticles on A549 lung cancer cells. ACS Omega. 2017;2(7):3527–3538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhi A, Joel H, James E, et al. Recent advances in nanoengineering cellulose for cargo delivery. J Control Release. 2019;294:53–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capadona JR, Shanmuganathan K, Tyler DJ, et al. Stimuliresponsive polymer nanocomposites inspired by the sea cucumber dermis. Science. 2008;319(5868):1370–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Zicheng D, Yang Z, et al. Biomarkerless targeting and photothermal cancer cell killing by surface-electrically-charged superparamagnetic Fe3O4 composite nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2017;9(4):1457–1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Le W, Wang Y, et al. Targeting negative surface charges of cancer cells by multifunctional nanop-robes. Theranostics. 2016;6(11):1887–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh N, Park JH. Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9(l):51–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matta A, Kw S, Ralhan R. Zeta as novel molecular target for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Target. 2012;16:14–13-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talero R, Pedrajas C, Rahhal V. 2013. Performance of fresh Portland cement pastes-Determination of some specific rheological parameters. In: Durairaj R, editor. Rheology: new concepts, applications and methods, 1st ed. London: IntechOpen, 57–79. 10.5772/53761
   Google Scholar
• Endes C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Mueller S, et al. A critical review of the current knowledge regarding the biological impact of nanocellulose. J Nanobiotechnol. 2016;14(1):78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannukainen KS, Suhonen S, Savolainen K, et al. Genotoxicity of nanofibrillated cellulose in vitro as measured by enzyme comet assay. Toxicol Lett. 2012;211:s71. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham SA, Day NE, Luben R, et al. Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. The Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1496–1501. 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13174-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrul M, Nindrea D. Dietary fibre protective against colorectal cancer patients in asia: a meta-analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(10):1723–1727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tchounwou CK, Yedjou CG, Farah I, et al. D-Glucose-Induced cytotoxic, genotoxic, and apoptotic effects on human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2014;6:156–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayat A, Elshamy LE, Kotram Olfat SB, et al. The effects of green synthesized anionic cupric oxide nanoparticles on zaraibi goat spermatozoa during cryopreservation with and without removal of seminal plasma. Anim Biotechnol. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2106992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flávia DM, Cristina DV. 2013. Cellulose and its derivatives use in the pharmaceutical compounding practice. Cellulose - Medical, Pharmaceutical and Electronic Applications. DOI: 10.5772/56637
   Google Scholar
• Trovatti E, Tang H, Hajian A, et al. Enhancing strength and toughness of cellulose nanofibril network structures with an adhesive peptide. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:256–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefa AA, Amirian J, Kang HJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of effectiveness of a novel TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber-silk fibroin scaffold in wound healing. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;177:284–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar