Reliability-based design optimization scheme for designing electromagnetic shielding structures

References

• Tong XC. Advanced materials and design for electromagnetic interference shielding. New York (NY): CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Paul CR. Introduction to electromagnetic compatibility. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ladkin PB. Electro-magnetic interference with aircraft systems: why worry? [WWW] networks and distributed systems [cited 2013 Apr 23]. Available from: www.rvs.unibielefeld.de/publications/Incidents/DOCS/Research/Rvs/Article/EMI.html, Article RVS-J-97-03.
   Google Scholar
• Helfrick A. Avionics and portable electronics: trouble in the air? Avionics News Magazine. 1996 Sep. Available from: http://www.bluecoat.org/reports/Helfrick_96_PED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scarry E. The fall of TWA 800: the possibility of electromagnetic interference. The New York Rev. Books. 1998. p. 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MP, Bozec D, Marshman CA. Healthcare engineering and electromagnetic compatibility. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Healthcare Engineering – Latest Developments and Applications: I Mech E Conference Publications; 2003 Nov; London: Professional Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Pashazadeh AM, Aghajani M, Nabipour I, Assadi M. An update on mobile phones interference with medical devices. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2013;156:401–406. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham D. Shielding: quantifying the shielding requirements for portable electronic design and providing new solutions by using a combination of materials and design. Mater. Des. 2000;21:45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Jing X. Intrinsically conducting polymers for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2005;16:344–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, Kim NH, Bose S, Lee JH. Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010;35:1350–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saleh MH, Sundararaj U. A review of vapor grown carbon nanofiber/polymer conductive composites. Carbon. 2009;47:2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geetha S, Satheesh Kumar KK, Rao CRK, Vijayan M, Trivedi DC. EMI shielding: methods and materials – a review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009;112:2073–2086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung DDL. Carbon materials for structural self-sensing, electromagnetic shielding and thermal interfacing. Carbon. 2012;50:3342–3353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottahed BD. Enhanced shielding effectiveness of polymer matrix composite enclosures utilizing constraint-based optimization. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2000;40:61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza RC, Fontgalland G, Barbosa de Melo MA, Freire RCS, Vasconcelos RB. In: Proposal of a multilayer shield design using genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IMTC). Ottawa, Canada: IEEE; 2005;3:2300–2305.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang NH, Wojkiewicz J-L, Miane J-L, Biscarro RS. Lightweight electromagnetic shields using optimised polyaniline composites in the microwave band. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2007;18:257–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli D, Apollo C, Pastore R, Barbera D, Morles RB, Marchetti M, Gradoni G, Primiani VM, Moglie F. Optimization of multilayer shields made of composite nanostructured materials. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 2012;54:60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK, Thakur AK. Electromagnetic interference shielding design using real-coded genetic algorithm and reliability evaluation in X-band. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving (SocProS); 2011 Dec; IIT Roorkee, India. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing (Springer Series). 2012;131:331–342.
   Google Scholar
• Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK, Thakur AK. Design and optimization of multilayered electromagnetic shield using a real-coded genetic algorithm. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B. 2012;39:241–266.
   Google Scholar
• Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK, Thakur AK. On the design and reliability analysis of electromagnetic absorbers using real-coded genetic algorithm and Monte Carlo simulation. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B. 2012;43:169–187.
   Google Scholar
• Tu J, Choi KK. A new study on reliability based design optimization. J. Mech. Des. 1999;121:557–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK, Thakur AK. Reliability-based design optimization of broadband microwave absorbers. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2013;27:1407–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli D, Pastore R, Apollo C. Broadband electromagnetic absorbers using carbon nanostructure-based composites. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 2011;59:2633–2646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M. Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Stat. 1952;23:470–472.
   Google Scholar
• Youn BD, Choi KK. Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J. 2004;42:124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Gupta S, Daum D, Branke J, Mall AK, Padmanabhan D. Reliability based optimization using evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2009;13:1054–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdebenito MA, Schuëller GI. A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct. Multi. Optim. 2010;42:645–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Choi KK, Chang KH. A mixed design approach for probabilistic structural durability. Struct. Optim. 1997;14:81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz RB, Plantz VC, Brush DR. Shielding theory and practice. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 1988;30:187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han F, Zhang L. Degeneration of shielding effectiveness of planar shields due to oblique incident plane waves. In: International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility; 1996 Aug 19–23; Santa Clara, CA. p. 82–86. doi:10.1109/ISEMC.1996.561206.
   Google Scholar
• Oraizi H, Afsahi M. Analysis of planar dielectric multilayers as FSS by transmission line transfer matrix method (TLTMM). Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2007;74:217–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K. An efficient constraint handling method for the genetic algorithm. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000;186:311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Agrawal RB. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Comp. Syst. 1995;9:115–148.
   Google Scholar
• Schucany WR. Kernel Smoothers: an overview of curve estimators for the first graduate course in nonparametric statistics. Stat. Sci. 2004;19:663–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar