Four-dimensional SAR imaging algorithm using Bayesian compressive sensing

References

• Morrison K, Bennett JC, Nolan M. Using DInSAR to separate surface and subsurface features. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013;51:3424–3430.10.1109/TGRS.2012.2226183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett B, Whelan P, Dwyer E. Detecting changes in surface soil moisture content using differential SAR interferometry. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2013;34:7091–7112.10.1080/01431161.2013.813654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Deng YK. Investigation on electronic azimuth beam steering in the spaceborne SAR imaging modes. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2011;25:2076–2088.10.1163/156939311798071983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun XL, Yu AX, Dong Z, Liang DN. A high resolution imaging method for differential SAR tomography. J. Elec. Inform. Tech. 2012;34:273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Gianfranco F, Diego R, Serafino F. Four-dimensional SAR imaging for height estimation and monitoring of signal and double scatterers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009;47:224–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardini F. Differential tomography: a new framework for SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2005;43:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes EJ, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 2006;52:489–509.10.1109/TIT.2005.862083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho D. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 2006;52:1289–1306.10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman M, Strohmer A. High-resolution radar via compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2009;57:2275–2284.10.1109/TSP.2009.2014277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren XZ, Li YF, Yang RL. Four-dimensional SAR imaging scheme based on compressive sensing. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B. 2012;39:225–239.10.2528/PIERB11121212
   Google Scholar
• Ji S, Xue Y, Carin L. Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2008;56:2346–2356.10.1109/TSP.2007.914345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XZ, Qin JH, Li GJ. SAR target classification using Bayesian compressive sensing with scattering centers features. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2013;136:385–407.10.2528/PIER12120705
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Qiao ZJ, Xing MD, Sheng JL, Guo R, Bao Z. High-resolution ISAR imaging by exploiting sparse apertures. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 2012;60:997–1008.10.1109/TAP.2011.2173130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoo M, Fiume E. Hierarchical Poisson disk sampling distributions. Proc. Graphics Interface. 1992; 94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Jones TR. Efficient generation of Poisson-disk sampling patterns. J. Graphics Tools. 2006;11:27–36.10.1080/2151237X.2006.10129217
   Google Scholar
• Applebaum L, Howard S, Searle S, Calderbank R. Chirp sensing codes: deterministic compressed sensing measurements for fast recovery. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 2009;26:283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranuuk RG, Cevher V, Duarte MF, Hegde C. Model-based compressive sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 2010;56:1982–2001.10.1109/TIT.2010.2040894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranuuk RG, Cevher V, Wakin MB. Low-dimensional models for dimensionality reduction and signal recovery: a geometric perspective. Proc. IEEE. 2010;959–971.10.1109/JPROC.2009.2038076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevher V. Learning with compressible priors. Vancouver: Neural information processing systems (NIPS); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi MD, Ulrych TJ, Walker CJ. Interpolation and extrapolation using a high resolution discrete fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1998;46:31–38.10.1109/78.651165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Mohammad-Djafari. Bayesian approach with prior models which enforce sparsity in signal and image processing. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2012;52:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Qiao Z, Xing M, Li Y, Bao Z. High-resolution ISAR imaging with sparse stepped-frequency waveforms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011;49:4630–4651.10.1109/TGRS.2011.2151865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar