Multi-view radar target recognition based on multitask compressive sensing

References

• Yang SY, Wang M, Jiao LC. Radar target recognition using contourlet packet transform and neural network approach. Signal Process. 2009;89:394–409.10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Ma YG, Wang M, Xie DM, Wu Y, Jiao LC. Compressive feature and kernel sparse coding-based radar target recognition. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2013;7:755–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespe M, Barker CJ, Griffiths HD. Radar target classification using multiple perspectives. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2007;1:300–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SK. High range resolution profiles as motion-invariant features for moving ground targets identification in SAR-based automatic target recognition. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2009;45:1017–1039.10.1109/TAES.2009.5259180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou N, Chen W. High range resolution profile automatic target recognition using sparse representation. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2010;23:556–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnab KS, Anindya SP. Eigen-template-based HRR-ATR with multi-look and time-recursion. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2013;49:2369–2385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranney K, Soumekh M. Signal subspace change detection in averaged multilook SAR imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006;44:201–213.10.1109/TGRS.2005.859956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs SP, O’Sullivan JA. Automatic target recognition using sequences of high resolution radar range-profiles. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2000;36:364–381.10.1109/7.845214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao XJ, Runkle P, Carin L. Identification of ground targets from sequential high-range-resolution radar signatures. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2002;38:1230–1242.10.1109/TAES.2002.1145746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XZ, Liu SJ. Multi-perspective SAR target recognition based on non-negative time-frequency matrix factorization. J. Astronaut. 2012;22:1269–1368.
   Google Scholar
• Donoho DL. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 2006;52:1289–1306.10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Wang M, Jin L, Wang SG, Liu F, Jiao LC. Learning compressive sampling via multiscale and steerable support value transform. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2015;82:128–138.10.1016/j.knosys.2015.02.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabayir O, Yucedag OM, Makal Y, Kent S. Performance analysis of compressive ISAR imaging for complex targets. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2014;28:1236–1245.10.1080/09205071.2014.913506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Cheng K, Wang M, Xie DM, Jiao LC. High resolution range-reflectivity estimation of radar targets via compressive sampling and memetic algorithm. Inf. Sci. 2013;252:144–156.10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A, Sastry SS, MA Y. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009;31:210–227.10.1109/TPAMI.2008.79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LX, Yang SY, Li SJ, Zhang R, Liu F, Jiao LC. Coupled compressed sensing inspired sparse spatial-spectral LSSVM for hyperspectral image classification. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2015;79:80–89.10.1016/j.knosys.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Jin HH, Yang LX, Xu WH, Jiao LC. Compressive sensing-inspired dual-sparse SLFNN for hyperspectral imagery classification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2014;11:220–224.10.1109/LGRS.2013.2253443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji SH, Dunson D, Carin L. Multitask compressive sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2009;57:92–106.10.1109/TSP.2008.2005866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang YG, Yang L, Jiang WL. Synthesized multitask compressive sensing for block-sparse signal recovery. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2015;29:602–614.10.1080/09205071.2015.1011348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes E. The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing. Acad. Sci. 2006;346:589–592.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp JA, Wright SJ. Computational methods for sparse solution of linear inverse problems. Proc. IEEE. 2010;98:948–958.10.1109/JPROC.2010.2044010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian JH, Sun JP, Zhang YX, Najeeb A. The effects of input signal-to-noise ratio on compressive sensing SAR imaging. The 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS); Dalian: IEEE; 2010; p. 533–537.
   Google Scholar
• Ji SH, Xue Y, Carin L. Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2008;56:2346–2356.10.1109/TSP.2007.914345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shihao Ji. MT_CS_demo [ Online]. Available from: http://www.ece.duke.edu/~shji/BCS.html.
   Google Scholar
• Potter LC, Moses RL. Attributed scattering centers for SAR ATR. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997;6:79–91.10.1109/83.552098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan XW, Hu JM, Zhao G, Zhang J, Wan JW. A new parameter estimation method for GTD model based on modified compressed sensing. Prog. Electromagnet. Res. 2013;141:553–575.10.2528/PIER13052017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du L. Study on radar HRRP target recognition [Doctor thesis]. Xi’an: Xidian University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Du L, Liu HW, Bao Z, Zhang JY. A two-distribution compounded statistical model for radar HRRP target recognition. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2006;54:2226–2238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing MD, Bao Z, Pei BN. Properties of high-resolution range profiles. Opt. Eng. 2002;41:493–504.10.1117/1.1431251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho DL, Huo X. Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 1999;47:2845–2862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candès E, Eldar YC, Needell D. Compressed sensing with coherent and redundant dictionaries. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 2011;31:59–73.10.1016/j.acha.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang HC, Nasrabadi NM, Zhang Y, Huang TS. Multi-view automatic target recognition using joint sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2012;48:2481–2497.10.1109/TAES.2012.6237604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SQ, Zhan RH, Zhang J, Zhuang ZW. RADAR automatic target recognition based on sequential vanishing component analysis. Prog. Electromagnet. Res. 2014;145:241–250.10.2528/PIER14011608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossing JC, Ross TD. An evaluation of SAR ATR algorithm performance sensitivity to MSTAR extended operating conditions. In: Edmund G. Zelnio, editor. Proceeding of SPIE, Algorithm for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery V. Vol. 3370; Orlando, FL; 1998; p. 554–565.
   Google Scholar
• David G, Michael O, Bart K, Brett K, Rob W. Preliminary comparison of high range resolution signature of moving and stationary ground vehicles. Proc. SPIE. 2002;4727:205–212.
   Google Scholar