Impulse impedance of the horizontal grounding electrode: comparison of the theoretical antenna model approach and experimental analysis

References

• Visacro S, Rosado G. Response of grounding electrodes to impulsive currents: an experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. February 2009;51(1):161–164.10.1109/TEMC.2008.2008396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visacro S. A comprehensive approach to the grounding response to lightning currents. IEEE Trans Power Delivery. 2007;22(1):381–386.10.1109/TPWRD.2006.876707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesche FM, Ianoz M, Karlsson T. EMC analysis methods and computational models. New York (NY): Wiley; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Velazquez R, Mukhedkar D. Analytical modelling of grounding electrodes transient behavior. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst. 1984;PAS-103(6):1314–1322.10.1109/TPAS.1984.318465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar RP, Velazquez R, Loeloieian M, et al. Review of analytical methods for calculating the performance of large grounding electrodes part 1: theoretical considerations. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst. 1985;104(11):3123–3133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grcev L, Dawalibi F. An electromagnetic model for transients in grounding systems. IEEE Trans Power Delivery. 1990;5(4):1773–1781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grcev LD, Menter FE. Transient electromagnetic fields near large earthing systems. IEEE Trans Magn. 1996;32(3):1525–1528.10.1109/20.497540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljak D, Doric V. Wire antenna model for transient analysis of simple grounding systems, part II: the horizontal grounding electrode. Prog Electromagn Res. 2006;64:167–189.10.2528/PIER06062102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljak D, Sesnic S, Goic R. Analytical versus boundary element modelling of horizontal ground electrode. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 2010;34:307–314.10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šesnić S, Poljak D. Antenna model of the horizontal grounding electrode for transient impedance calculation: analytical versus boundary element method. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 2013;37:909–913.10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoorfar A, Chang DC. Analytic determination of the transient response of a thin-wire antenna based upon an SEM representation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1982;30(6):1145–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KC. Transient response of an infinite cylindrical antenna in a dissipative medium. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1987;35(5):562–573.10.1109/TAP.1987.1144145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesnic S, Poljak D, Tkachenko SV. Analytical modeling of a transient current flowing along the horizontal grounding electrode. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2013;55(6):1132–1139.10.1109/TEMC.2013.2250289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majdandzic F. Groundings and grounding systems (In Croatian). Zagreb: Graphis; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau A. Lightning earthing system: a practical guide. International lightning protection 1st Symposium; Valencia; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtas S. Earthing effective length for low and high amplitudes of lightning impulse currents. XXII-nd International Conference on Electromagnetic Disturbances; Vilnius; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lathi D. Impulse measurements in earthing systems. Cardiff: Cardiff University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Skrzynecki E. Standards guide EN 62305. Swidnica: Sonnel S.A; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Poljak D. Advanced modeling in computational electromagnetic compatibility. New Jersey (NJ): Wiley-Interscience; 2007.10.1002/0470116889
   Google Scholar
• Poljak D, Kovac N. Time domain modeling of a thin wire in a two-media configuration featuring a simplified reflection/transmission coefficient approach. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 2009;33:283–293.10.1016/j.enganabound.2008.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima T, Nakae T, Ishibashi R. Calculation of complex fields in conducting media. IEEE Trans Electr Insul. February 1980;EI-15(1):1–7.10.1109/TEI.1980.298290
   Google Scholar
• Poljak D, Doric V, Rachidi F, et al. generalized form of telegrapher’s equations for the electromagnetic field coupling to buried wires of finite length. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2009;51(2):331–337.10.1109/TEMC.2008.2010710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visacro S, Silvera H. The impact of the frequency dependence of soil parameters on the lightning performance of transmission lines. IEE Trans EMC. 2015;57:434–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milun S, Petrovic G, Garma T, et al. Report on soil geo-electrical properties on the site SS 110/10 (20) kV Zadar East (In Croatian). Split: FESB; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Milun S. Analysis of the non-homogeneus geo-electric soil probing measurements (In Croatian). Elektrotehnika. 1984;2(1):133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Milun S. PC-based geo-electrical probing curve interpretation (In Croatian). Elektrotehnika. 1986;4:363–368.
   Google Scholar
• Shevnin V, Modin I, Bobachev A. IP12Win. Moscow: Moscow State University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho VL, Piantini A, Almaguer HAD, et al. The influence of the seasional soil moisture on the behavior of the soil resistivity and power distribution grounding systems. Electr Pow Syst Res. 2014;118:76–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grcev L. Impulse efficiency of simple grounding electrode arrangements. 18th Int. Zurich Symposium on EMC; Munich; 2007.10.1109/EMCZUR.2007.4388261
   Google Scholar