A nonlinear Kernel-based adaptive learning-by-examples method for robust NDT/NDE of conductive tubes

References

• Cartz L. Nondestructive testing. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Balageas D, Fritzen CP, Guemes A. Structural health monitoring. Chippenham (UK): Wiley-ISTE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hellier C. Handbook of nondestructive evaluation. (US): McGraw-Hill Professional; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkovsky S, Zoughi R. Microwave and millimeter wave nondestructive testing and evaluation – overview and recent advances. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag. 2007 Apr;10:26–38. doi: 10.1109/MIM.2007.364985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ida N. Microwave nondestructive testing. Amsterdam (NL): Kluwer Publishing Company; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Zoughi R. Microwave non-destructive testing and evaluation. Amsterdam (NL): Kluwer Publishing Company; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Grimberg R. Electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation: present and future. J Mech Eng. 2011 Mar;2011:204–217. doi: 10.5545/sv-jme.2010.171
   Google Scholar
• Skarlatos A, Pichenot G, Lesselier D, et al. Electromagnetic modeling of a damaged ferromagnetic metal tube by a volume integral equation formulation. IEEE Trans Magn. 2008 May;44:623–632. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2008.918206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarlatos A, Theodoulitis T. Impedance calculation of a bobbin coil in a conductive tube with eccentric walls. IEEE Trans Magn. 2010 Nov;46:3885–3892. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2064331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesselier D, Razek A. Eddy current scattering and inverse scattering, Green's integral and variational formulations. In: Scattering and inverse scattering in pure and applied science. London (UK): Academic; 2002. p. 486–507.
   Google Scholar
• Norton SJ, SanFilipo WA, Won IJ. Eddy-current and current-channeling response to spheroidal anomalies. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2005 Oct;43:2200–2209. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2005.856641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorgati R, Lesselier D, Duchene B, et al. Eddy current testing of anomalies in conductive materials, part II: quantitative imaging via deterministic and stochastic inversion techniques. IEEE Trans Magn. 1992 May;28:1850–1862. doi: 10.1109/20.141295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudanyali O, Yildiz S, Semerci O, et al. A microwave tomographic approach for nondestructuctive testing of dielectric coated metallic surfaces. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2008 Apr;5:180–184. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2008.915602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Urso M, Isernia T, Morabito AF. On the solution of 2-D inverse scattering problems via source-type integral equations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2010 Mar;48:1186–1198. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2032175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbuz TU, Aslanyurek B, Karabulut EP, et al. An efficient nonlinear imaging approach for dielectric objects buried under a rough surface. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2014 May;52:3013–3022. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2268662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Oliveri G, Massa A. GPR Prospecting through an inverse scattering frequency-hopping multi-focusing approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2015 Dec;53:6573–6592. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2444391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Poli L, Massa A. Advanced multi-frequency GPR data processing for non-linear deterministic imaging. Signal Process. 2017 Mar;132:306–318. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Poli L, Anselmi N, et al. Multi-frequency particle swarm optimization for enhanced multi-resolution GPR microwave imaging. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2017 Mar;55:1305–1317. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2622061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca P, Benedetti M, Donelli M, et al. Evolutionary optimization as applied to inverse scattering problems. Inverse Probl. 2008 Nov;25:1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miorelli R, Reboud C, Theodoulidis T, et al. Efficient modeling of ECT signals for realistic cracks in layered half-space. IEEE Trans Magn. 2013 Jun;49:2886–2892. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2236102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Ikeda K, Tsuboi H. Fast simulation method for eddy current testing. IEEE Trans Magn. 2000 Jul;36:1728–1731. doi: 10.1109/20.877694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui TJ, Chew WC, Aydiner AA, et al. Fast-forward solvers for the low-frequency detection of buried dielectric objects. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2003 Sep;41:2026–2036. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.813502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frezza F, Pajewski L, Ponti C, et al. Electromagnetic scattering by a metallic cylinder buried in a lossy medium with the cylindrical-wave approach. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2013 Jan;10:179–183. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2197172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilicz S, Lambert M, Gyimothy S. Kriging-based generation of optimal databases as forward and inverse surrogate models. Inverse Prob. 2010 Jun;26. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/7/074012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell JR, Chew W. Response of a point source in a multicylindrically layered medium. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1987 Nov;25:850–858. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.1987.289757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa A, Rocca P, Oliveri G. Compressive sensing in electromagnetics – a review. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2015 Feb;57:224–238. doi: 10.1109/MAP.2015.2397092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmi N, Oliveri G, Salucci M, et al. Wavelet-based compressive imaging of sparse targets. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2015 Nov;63:4889–4900. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2444423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Qu L, Zhang S, et al. MT-BCS-based two-dimensional diffraction tomographic GPR imaging algorithm with multiview-multistatic configuration. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2016 Jun;13:831–835. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2549538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmi N, Oliveri G, Hannan MA, et al. Color compressive sensing imaging of arbitrary shaped scatterers. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Techn. 2017 Jun;65:1986–1999. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2016.2645570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N. Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York (NY): Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Smola AJ, Scholkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput. 2004 Aug;14:199–222. doi: 10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Rodriguez LO, Arzuaga-Cruz E, Velez-Reyes M. Unsupervised linear feature-extraction methods and their effects in the classification of high-dimensional data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2007 Feb;45:469–483. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.885412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Anselmi N, Oliveri G, et al. Real-time NDT-NDE through an innovative adaptive partial least squares SVR inversion approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2016 Nov;54:6818–6832. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2591439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernieri A, Ferrigno L, Laracca M, et al. Crack shape reconstruction in eddy current testing using machine learning systems for regression. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2008 Sep;57:1958–1968. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2008.919011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosado LS, Janeiro FM, Ramos PM, et al. Defect characterization with eddy current testing using nonlinear-regression feature extraction and artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2013 May;62:1207–1214. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2012.2236729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa A, Boni A, Donelli M. A classification approach based on SVM for electromagnetic subsurface sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2005 Sep;43:2084–2093. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2005.853186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caorsi S, Gamba P. Electromagnetic detection of dielectric cylinders by a neural network approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1999 Mar;37:820–827. doi: 10.1109/36.752198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa A, Oliveri G, Salucci M, et al. Learning-by-examples techniques as applied to electromagnetics. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2018;32:516–541. doi: 10.1080/09205071.2017.1402713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold S, Sjostrom M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2001;58:109–130. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenas-Garcia J, Petersen KB, Camps-Valls G, et al. Kernel multivariate analysis framework for supervised subspace learning: a tutorial on linear and Kernel multivariate methods. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2013 Jul;30:16–29. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2013.2250591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantalainen M, Bylesio M, Cloarec O, et al. Kernel-based orthogonal projections to latent structures (K-OPLS). J Chemometrics. 2007 Aug;21:376–385. doi: 10.1002/cem.1071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew WC. Waves and fields in inhomogeneous media. New York (NY): IEEE Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester AIJ, Keane A, Sobester A. Engineering design via surrogate modelling. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of NDE Centers (FNDEC). “2012 Eddy current benchmarks”. Available from: www.wfndec.org.
   Google Scholar
• CIVA. Simulation and analysis for NDT. Available from: http://www-civa.cea.fr.
   Google Scholar
• Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J Chemometrics. 2002;16:119–128. doi: 10.1002/cem.695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar