Isolation enhancement of MIMO antennas using shorting pins

References

• Guan K, He D, Ai B, et al. 5-GHz obstructed vehicle-to-vehicle channel characterization for internet of intelligent vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019;6:100–110. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2872437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhang S. Multiplexing efficiency for MIMO antenna-channel impairment characterisation in realistic multipath environments. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2017;11:524–528. doi: 10.1049/iet-map.2016.0192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhang S, Li Q. A review of mutual coupling in MIMO systems. IEEE Access. 2018;6:24706–24719. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2830653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getu BN, Janaswamy R. The effect of mutual coupling on the capacity of the MIMO cube. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2005;4:240–244. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2005.852579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta IJ, Ksienski AA. Effect of mutual coupling on the performance of adaptive arrays. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1983;31:785–791. doi: 10.1109/TAP.1983.1143128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel EM, Pasala KM. Effects of mutual coupling on the performance of STAP antenna arrays. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2000;36:518–527. doi: 10.1109/7.845236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wu KL. A dual-band coupled resonator decoupling network for two coupled antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2015;63:2843–2850. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2421973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Du Z. A wideband printed dual-antenna system with a novel neutralization line for mobile terminals. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2013;12:1428–1431. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2013.2287199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JY, Yang T, Lee J. Low correlation MIMO antennas with negative group delay. Prog Electromagn Res. 2011;22:151–163. doi: 10.2528/PIERC11051007
   Google Scholar
• Khan MS, Shafique MF, Naqvi A, et al. A miniaturized dual-band MIMO antenna for wlan applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2015;14:958–961. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2387701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi L, Zhai H, Li L. A low-profile antenna system with compact new structure for reducing mutual coupling. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2019;33:71–83. doi: 10.1080/09205071.2018.1524796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Yu Y, Yuan M, et al. A compact printed monopole array with defected ground structure to reduce the mutual coupling. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2011;25:1963–1974. doi: 10.1163/156939311798072036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MS, Capobianco AD, Asif SM, et al. A compact csrr-enabled uwb diversity antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2017;16:808–812. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2016.2604843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohestani M, Moreira AA, Skrivervik AK. A novel compact CPW-fed polarization diversity ultra-wideband antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2014;13:563–566. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2312730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo M, Daviu EA, Bataller MF, et al. A broadband pattern diversity annular slot antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012;60:1596–1600. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2011.2180314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong L, Gao P. Compact dual-polarized slot UWB antenna with CPW-fed structure. Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag. Society Int. Symp; 2012 July 1–2; Chicago, IL, USA: IEEE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li WX, Liu C, et al. A printed diversity cantor set fractal antenna for ultra wideband communication applications. Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag. EM Theory Int. Symp; 2012 Oct 34–38; Xi’an, China: IEEE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon HK, Yoon YJ, Kim H, et al. Flexible ultra-wideband polarisation diversity antenna with band-notch function. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2011;5:1463–1470. doi: 10.1049/iet-map.2010.0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamiuk G, Beer S, Wiesbeck W, et al. Dual orthogonal polarized antenna for UWB-IR technology. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2009;8:981–984. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2009.2029880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Lau BK, Sunesson A, et al. Closely-packed UWB MIMO/diversity antenna with different patterns and polarizations for USB dongle applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012;60:4372–4380. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2012.2207049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh WK, Chen ZN, Qing X, et al. A planar UWB diversity antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2009;57:3467–3473. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2024131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Xu L, Chen X, et al. A compact Ultrawideband diversity antenna with high isolation. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2014;13:35–38. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2013.2295414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviu EA, Gallo M, Clemente BB, et al. Ultra-wideband slot ring antenna for diversity applications. Electron Lett. 2010;46:478–480. doi: 10.1049/el.2010.0262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YC, Lin YC. A compact dual-polarized UWB antenna with high port isolation. Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag. Society Int. Symp; 2010 July 1–4; Toronto, ON, Canada: IEEE; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X. On statistics of the measured antenna efficiency in a reverberation chamber. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013;61:5417–5424. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2013.2276920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Kildal P-S, Carlsson J, et al. MRC diversity and MIMO capacity evaluations of multi-port antennas using reverberation chamber and anechoic chamber. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013;61:917–926. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2012.2223442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallbjorner P. Accuracy in reverberation chamber antenna correlation measurements. International workshop on Antenna Technology: Small and Smart Antennas Metamaterials and Applications; 2007 Mar 21–23; Cambridge, UK: IEEE; 2007.
   Google Scholar