Electromagnetic analysis and simulation aspects of wireless power transfer in the domain of inductive power transmission technology

References

• Rim CT, Mi C. Wireless power transfer for electric vehicles and mobile devices. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Valtchev S, Borges B, Brandisky K, et al. Resonant contactless energy transfer with improved efficiency. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2009;24(3):685–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CS, Stielau OH, Covic GA. Design consideration for a contactless electric vehicle battery charger. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2005;52(5):1308–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallán J, Villa JL, Llombart A, et al. Optimal design of ICPT systems applied to electric vehicle battery charge. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2009;56(6):2140–2149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CS, Covic GA, Stielau OH. Power transfer capability and bifurcation phenomena of loosely coupled inductive power transfer system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2004;51(1):148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirimele V. Design and integration of a dynamic IPT system for automotive applications. PhD dissertation, Politecnico di Torino and University Paris-Saclay; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cirimele V, Diana M, Freschi F, et al. Inductive power transfer for automotive applications: state-of-the-art and future trends. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2018;54(5):4069–4079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad A, Saad Alam M, Chabaan R. A comprehensive review of wireless charging technologies for electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Transport Elect. 2018;4(1):38–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuad Abdul Aziz A, Fakhizan Romlie M, Baharudin Z. Review of inductively coupled power transfer for electric vehicle charging. IET Power Electron. 2019;12(14):3611–3623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WC. The history of power transmission by radio waves. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 1984;32(9):1230–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesla N. Apparatus for transmission of electrical energy, May 15 1900. US Patent 649,621.
   Google Scholar
• George Iljitch Babat, High frequency electric transport system with contactless transmission of energy, September 1951. Application number GB926946A.
   Google Scholar
• Otto DV. Power supply equipment for electrically-driven vehicle, June 19 1974. JP Patent 49 063 111.
   Google Scholar
• Shladover SE, et al. Path at 20-history and major milestones. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2007;8(4):584–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boys J, Green A. Inductive power pick-up coils, WO Patent App. PCT/NZ1994/000,115, Apr. 27, 1995. [Online]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/WO1995011545A1?cl=en.
   Google Scholar
• Boys JT, Green AW. Flux concentrator for an inductive power transfer system, US Patent 5,821,638, Oct. 13, 1998. [Online]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/US5821638.
   Google Scholar
• WAVE website. [cited 2020 Jan]. Available from: https://www.waveipt.com/.
   Google Scholar
• [Cited 2020 Jan]. Available from: https://www.bombardier.com/fr/media/newsList/details.bt_20150901_-berlin-erste-hauptstadt-mit-kabellos-geladener-e-bu.bombardiercom.html.
   Google Scholar
• Suh I. Application of shaped magnetic field in resonance (SMFIR) technology to future urban transportation, in CIRP design conference, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn S, Kim J. Magnetic field design for high efficient and low EMF wireless power transfer in on-line electric vehicle. Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Proceedings of the 5th European conference; 2011, p. 3979–3982.
   Google Scholar
• Huh J, Lee SW, Lee WY, et al. Narrow-width inductive power transfer system for online electrical vehicles. Power Electron IEEE Trans. 2011;26(12):3666–3679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson RW, Normann B. Test results of the plugless inductive charging system from evatran group, Inc. SAE Int J Alt Powertrains. 2014;3:64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Budhia M, Covic GA, Boys JT. Design and optimization of circular magnetic structures for lumped inductive power transfer systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2011;26(11):3096–3108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhia M, Boys JT, Covic GA, et al. Development of a single-sided flux magnetic coupler for electric vehicle IPT charging systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2013;60(1):318–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtchev S, Borges B, Brandisky K, et al. Resonant contactless energy transfer with improved efficiency. IEEE Trans on Power Electron. 2009;24(3):685–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad M, Tezera Wodajo E, Choi S, et al. Modeling and design of passive shield to limit EMF emission and to minimize shield loss in unipolar wireless charging system for EV. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2019;34(12):12235–12245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998;74:494–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNIRP. ICNIRP statement V guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 2010;99:818–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. International committee on electromagnetic safety, the institute of electrical and electronics engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue, IEEE C95.1, IEEE Standards Dept., New York (NY); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar Kushwaha B, Rituraj G, Kumar P. 3-D analytical model for computation of mutual inductance for different misalignments With shielding in wireless power transfer system. IEEE Trans Transport Elect. 2017;3(2):332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashora HK, Buja G, Bertoluzzo M, et al. Analysis and design of DD coupler for dynamic wireless charging of electric vehicles. J Electromagn Wave Appl. 2018;32(22):170–189.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Dorrell DG. Loss analysis of circular wireless EV charging coupler. IEEE Trans Magn. 2014;50(11). article 8402104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques EG, Mendes AMS. Comparison of magnetic coupling structures for IPT systems. COMPEL – Int J Comput Math Electr Electron Eng. 2015;34(2):514–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Byun J, Lee BK. Performance analysis of magnetic power pads for inductive power transfer systems with ferrite structure variation. J Electr Eng Technol. 2017;12(3):1211–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Joo D-M, Lee BK. Design and control of inductive power transfer system for electric vehicles considering wide variation of output voltage and coupling Coefficient. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2019;34(2):1197–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei XC, Li EP. Simulation and experimental comparison of different coupling mechanisms for the wireless electricity transfer. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2009;23:925–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shia X, Qia C, Qua M, et al. Effects of coil shapes on wireless power transfer via magnetic resonance coupling. J Electromagn Wave Appl. 2014;28(11):1316–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik Mudea K, Bertoluzzoa M, Bujaa G, et al. Design and experimentation of two-coil coupling for electric city-car WPT charging. J Electromagn Wave Appl. 2016;30(1):70–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim M, Bernard L, Pichon L, et al. Electromagnetic model of EV wireless charging systems in view of energy transfer and radiated field control. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech. 2014;46(2):355–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim M, Pichon L, Bernard L, et al. Advanced modeling of a 2-kW series-series resonating inductive charger for real electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Vehi Technol. Feb 2015;64:421–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Hao H, Covic GA, et al. Investigation of multiple decoupled coil primary pad topologies in lumped IPT systems for interoperable electric vehicle charging. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2015;30(4):1937–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, White JC, Abraham AM, et al. Loosely coupled Transformer structure and interoperability study for EV wireless charging systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2015;30(11):6356–6367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad A, Alam MS, Mohamed AAS. Design and interoperability analysis of Quadruple Pad structure for electric vehicle wireless charging application. IEEE Trans Transport Elect. 2019;5(4):934–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim M, Bernard L, Pichon L, et al. Inductive charger for electric vehicle: advanced modeling and interoperability analysis. IEEE Trans Power Elect. 2016;31(12):8094–8114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadakuduti J, Douglas M, Lu L, et al. Compliance demonstration of wireless power charging systems with respect to human safety limits. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2015;30(11):6264–6273. DOI:10.1109/TPEL.2015.2400455.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso I, Tsuchida S, Hirata A, et al. Evaluation of SAR in a human body model due to wireless power transmission in the 10 MHz band. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(15):4991–5002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ A, Douglas MG, Roman J, et al. Evaluation of wireless resonant power transfer systems with human electromagnetic exposure limits. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2013;55(2):265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel C, Gabriel S, Corthout E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. literature survey. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:2231–2249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durney CH, Iskander MF, Massoudi H, et al. An empirical formula for broad-band SAR calculations of prolate spheroidal models of humans and animals. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 1979;27(8):758–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn EG, et al. The Virtual FamilyVDevelopment of surface based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(2):23–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caon M. Voxel-based computational models of real human anatomy: a review. Radiation Environ Biophys. 2004;42(4):229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka T, Watanabe S, Sakurai K, et al. Development of realistic high-resolution whole-body voxel models of Japanese adult males and females of average height and weight, and application of models to radio-frequency electromagnetic-field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi H, Xu XG. Computational anthropomorphic models of the human anatomy: the path to realistic Monte Carlo modeling in radiological sciences. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:471–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi H, Tsui B. Review of computational anthropomorphic anatomical and physiological models. Proc IEEE. 2009;97(12):1938–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IT’IS Foundation, the virtual population, Zurich, Switzerland; 2012. [Online]. Available from: https://www.itis.ethz.ch/services/ anatomical-models/overview/.
   Google Scholar
• Cherubini E, Chavannes N, Kuster N. Anatomical-based deformation of 3-D CAD high-resolution human models for complex electromagnetic simulations. Presented at the Joint Meeting Bioelectromagnetics Society/Europe Bioelectromagnetics Association, Davos (Switzerland); June 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovic M, Poljak D. Electromagnetic-thermal dosimetry comparison of the homogeneous adult and child brain models based on the SIE approach. J Electromagn Wave Appl. 2015;29(17):2365–2379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Tan L, Shao Q, et al. Chinese adult anatomical models and the application in evaluation of wideband RF EMF exposure. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:2075–2089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahdouh S, Varsier N, Serrurier A, et al. A comprehensive tool for image-based generation of fetus and pregnant women mesh models for numerical dosimetry studies. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(16):4583–4602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee KS. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1966;14(3):585–589.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjem A, Lautru D, Dale C, et al. Study of specific absorption rate (SAR) induced in two child head models and in adult heads using mobile phones. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2005;53(1):4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaramello E, Parazzini M, Fiocchi S, et al. Stochastic dosimetry based on low rank tensor approximations for the assessment of children exposure to WLAN source. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microwave Med Biol. 2018;2(2):131.
   Google Scholar
• Cimala C, Clemens M, Streckert J, et al. Simulation of inductive power transfer systems exposing a human body with a coupled scaled-frequency approach. IEEE Trans Magn. 2017;53(6), paper 7201804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker J, Paulides M, Neufeld E, et al. Children and adults exposed to low-frequency magnetic fields at the ICNIRP reference levels: theoretical assessment of the induced electric fields. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(7):1815–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ A, Guldimann R, Bühlmann B, et al. Exposure of the human body to professional and domestic induction cooktops compared to the basic restrictions. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012;8:695–705.
   Google Scholar
• Chen XL, Umenei AE, Baarman DW, et al. Human exposure to close-range resonant wireless power transfer systems as a function of design parameters. IEEE Transa Electromagn Compat. 2014;56(5):1027–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto T, Arima T, Uno T, et al. Measurement of electromagnetic field in the vicinity of wireless power transfer system for evaluation of human-body exposure, EMC, Tokyo; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yavolovskaya E, Chiqovani G, Gabriadze G, et al. Simulation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields of inductive wireless power transfer systems in the frequency range from 1 Hz to 30 MHz. Proceeding of the 2016 international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility – EMC EUROPE 2016, Wroclaw (Poland), September 5–9, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Chakarothai J, Wake K, Arima T, et al. Exposure evaluation of an actual wireless power transfer system for an electric vehicle with near-field measurement. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2018;66(3):1543–1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S. Evaluation of electromagnetic exposure during 85 kHz wireless power transfer for electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Magnet. 2018;53(1). paper 5100208.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li W, Kang J, et al. Electromagnetic safety evaluation and protection methods for a wireless charging system in an electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2019;61(6):1913–1925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JC, Huang X, Chen C, et al. Effect of metal shielding on a wireless power transfer system. AIP Adv. 2017;7(5). Art. no. 056675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, et al. Coil design and shielding methods for a magnetic resonant wireless power transfer system. Proc IEEE. 2013;101(6):1332–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Cho J, Ahn S, et al. Suppression of leakage magnetic field from a wireless power transfer system using ferromagnetic material and metallic shielding. Proceeding IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, Pittsburgh (PA); Aug. 2012, p. 640–645.
   Google Scholar
• Hiles ML, Olsen RG, Holte KC, et al. Power frequency magnetic field management using a combination of active and passive shielding technology. IEEE Trans Power Del. 1998;13(1):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SM, Moon JI, Cho IK, et al. Advanced power control scheme in wireless power transmission for human protection from EM field. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Techn. 2015;63(3):847–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi T, Cruciani S, Maradei F, et al. Near field reduction in a wireless power transfer system using LCC compensation. IEEE Trans Electromag Compat. 2017;59(2):686–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi T, Cruciani S, Feliziani M. Numerical characterization of the magnetic field in electric vehicles equipped with a WPT system. Wireless Power Transfer. 2017;4:78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi T, Cruciani S, Feliziani M. Wireless power transfer (WPT) system for an electric vehicle (EV): How to shield the car from the magnetic field generated by two planar coils. Wireless Power Transfer. 2017;5:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim D-H, Cho Y, et al. Low leakage electromagnetic field level and high efficiency using a novel hybrid loop-array design for wireless high power transfer system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;66(6):4356–4367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding P, Pichon L, Bernard L, et al. Electromagnetic fields in human body by wireless inductive system. COMPEL: Int J Comput Math Elect Electron Eng. 2015;34(2):590–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokela K. Restricting exposure to pulsed and broadband magnetic fields. Health Phys. 2000;79(4):373–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirimele V, Fabio F, Luca G, et al. Human exposure assessment in dynamic inductive power transfer for automotive applications. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. Inst Elect Electron Eng. 2017;53(6):5000304.
   Google Scholar
• Kroese D, Taimre T, Botev Z. Handbook of Monte Carlo methods. New York: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A. Low-cost surrogate-assisted statistical analysis of miniaturized microstrip couplers. J Electromagn Wave Appl. 2016;30(10):1345–1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre J, Roussel H, Walter E, et al. Prediction from wrong models: the Kriging approach. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 1996;38(4):35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer D, Musy F, Nicolas L, et al. Probabilistic methods applied to 2D electromagnetic numerical dosimetry. COMPEL. 2008;27(3):651–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silly-Carette J, Lautru D, Wong M-F, et al. Variability on the propagation of a plane wave using stochastic collocation methods in a bio electromagnetic application. IEEE Microwave Wireless Comp Lett. 2009;19(4):185–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersaudy P, Sudret B, Varsier N, et al. A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions–application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry. J Comput Phys. 2015;286:103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liorni I, Parazzini M, Fiocchi S, et al. Study of the influence of the orientation of a 50-Hz magnetic field on fetal exposure using polynomial chaos decomposition. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:5934–5953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilicz S, Gyimóthy S, Pávó J, et al. 2016. Uncertainty quantification of wireless power transfer systems. 2016 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), Aveiro, 2016, pp. 1–3. DOI:10.1109/WPT.2016.7498861.
   Google Scholar
• Knaisch K, Gratzfeld P. Gaussian process surrogate model for the design of circular, planar coils used in inductive power transfer for electric vehicles. IET Power Electron. 2016;9(15):2786–2794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagouanelle P, Krauth V-L, Pichon L. uncertainty quantification in the assessment of human exposure near wireless power transfer systems in automotive applications, automotive, Turin (Italy); 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sudret B. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2008;93(7):964–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatman G, Sudret B. Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J Comput Phys. 2011;230(6):2345–2367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol IM. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathe Model Comput Exper. 1993;1(4):407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Larbi M, Stievano IS, Canavero FG, et al. Variability impact of many design parameters: the case of a realistic electronic link. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2018;60(1):34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagouanelle P, Krauth V-L, Pichon L. Uncertainty quantification in the assessment of human exposure near wireless power transfer systems in automotive applications, automotive, Turin (Italy); 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gori P-A, Sadarnac D, Caillierez A, et al. Sensorless inductive power transfer system for electric vehicles: strategy and control for automatic dynamic operation, 2017 19th European conference on power electronics and applications (EPE’17 ECCE Europe), Warsaw (Poland).
   Google Scholar
• Zucca M, Bottauscio O, Harmon S, et al. Metrology for inductive charging of electric vehicles (MICEV). Proceeding international conference of electrical and electronic technologies for automotive, Turin (Italy), July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• MICEV, MICEV project homepage. [Online]. [cited Jan 2020]. Available from: https://www.micev.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• S. Marelli, and B. Sudret, UQLab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab. Proceeding 2nd international conference on vulnerability, risk analysis and management (ICVRAM2014), Liverpool (UK); 2014, p. 2554–2563.
   Google Scholar
• Lagouanelle P, Bottauscio O, Pichon L, et al. Impact of parameters variability on the level of human exposure due to inductive power transfer. IEEE CEFC 2020 (Biennal of Electromagnetic Field Computation), Pisa (Italy), November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed AAS, An S, Mohammed O. Coil design optimization of power pad in IPT system for electric vehicle applications. IEEE Trans Magn. 2018;54(4). Article no. 9300405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otomo Y, Igarashi H. A 3-D topology optimization of magnetic cores for wireless power transfer device. IEEE Trans Magn. 2019;55(6). Article no. 8103005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu M, Ngo KDT. A fast method to optimize efficiency and stray magnetic field for inductive-power-transfer coils using lumped-loops model. IEEE Transa Power Electronic. 2019;33(4):3065–3075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruciani S, Campi T, Maradei F, et al. Active shielding design for wireless power transfer systems. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2019;61(6):1953–1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabric EU project final event & demonstration video. [Online]. [cited Jan 2020]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngrJ60o06f8.
   Google Scholar