Polarization insensitive multiband metasurface absorber for L, C, and X band applications

References

• Veselago VG. The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ε and μ.. Phys Usp. 1968;10:509–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh T, Caloz C. Electromagnetic metamaterials: transmission line theory and microwave applications. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pendry JB. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;85:3966–3969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Padilla WJ, Vier DC, et al. Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity. Phys Rev Lett Am Phys Soc. 2000;84:4184–4187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy NI, Sajuyigbe S, Mock JJ, et al. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett Am Phys Soc. 2008;100:207402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway CL, Kuester EF, Gordon JA, et al. An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: the two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2012;54:10–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munk BA. Frequency selective surfaces: theory and design. New York (NY): Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Costa F, Genovesi S, Monorchio A, et al. A circuit-based model for the interpretation of perfect metamaterial absorbers. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012;61:1201–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edries M, Mohamed HA, Hekal SS, et al. A new compact quad-band metamaterial absorber using interlaced I/square resonators: design, fabrication, and characterization. IEEE Access. 2020;8:143723–143733.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Yang J, Wang X, et al. Ultrabroadband metamaterial absorber based on effectively coupled multilayer HIS loaded structure with Dallenbach layer. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2022;70:232–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo W, Yang Y, He X, et al. A miniaturized metamaterial absorber for ultrahigh-frequency RFID system. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2017;16:329–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banadaki MD, Heidari AA, Nakhkash M. A metamaterial absorber with a new compact unit cell. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2018;17:205–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim D, Lim S. Ultrawideband electromagnetic absorber using sandwiched broadband metasurfaces. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2019;18:1887–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Gong S, Jiang W. Low-RCS monopolar patch antenna based on a dual-ring metamaterial absorber. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2018;17:102–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri M, Tofigh F, Shariati N, et al. Review on metamaterial perfect absorbers and their applications to IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021;8:4105–4131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukoor MA, Dey S, Koul SK. A simple polarization-insensitive and wide angular stable circular ring based Undeca-band absorber for EMI/EMC applications. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2021;63:1025–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra N, Choudhary DK, Chowdhury R, et al. An investigation on compact ultra-thin triple band polarization independent metamaterial absorber for microwave frequency applications. IEEE Access. 2017;5:4370–4376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad AAR. Miniaturized multi-band polarization-insensitive microwave absorber using microstrip interdigital capacitor. AEU Int J Electron Commun. 2021;137:153830.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl IJ. Lumped elements for RF and microwave circuits. Norwood (MA): Artech House Microwave Library; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Bhattacharyya S, Srivastava KV. Design, characterisation and fabrication of a broadband polarisation-insensitive multi-layer circuit analogue absorber. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2016;10:850–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya S, Ghosh S, Srivastava KV. Triple band polarization-independent metamaterial absorber with bandwidth enhancement at X-band. J Appl Phys AIP. 2013;114:094514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan S, Islam MT, Sahar NM, et al. Modified-segmented split-ring based polarization and angle-insensitive multi-band metamaterial absorber for X, ku and K band applications. IEEE Access. 2020;8:144051–144063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson AM, Ross GF. Measurement of the intrinsic properties of materials by time-domain techniques. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 1970;19:377–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araújo JB, Siqueira GL, Kemptner E, et al. An ultrathin and ultrawideband metamaterial absorber and an equivalent-circuit parameter retrieval method. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2020;68:3739–3746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Srivastava KV. An equivalent circuit model of FSS-based metamaterial absorber using coupled line theory. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2014;14:511–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansys, HFSS Version. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kalraiya S, Chaudhary RK, Gangwar RK. Polarization independent triple band ultrathin conformal metamaterial absorber for C- and X-frequency bands. AEU Int J Electron Commun. 2021;135:153752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury WW. Absorbent body for electromagnetic waves. US2599944A: 1952
   Google Scholar
• Wilbert DS, Hokmabadi MP, Kung P, et al. Equivalent-circuit interpretation of the polarization insensitive performance of THz metamaterial absorbers. IEEE Trans Terahertz Sci Technol. 2013;3:846–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkhel A, Chaudhuri SRB. Compact quad-band polarization insensitive ultrathin metamaterial absorber with wide angle stability. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2017;16:3240–3244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, Tong J, Zhou W, et al. Novel quadruple-band microwave metamaterial absorber. IEEE Photon J. 2015;7:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo M, Kim HK, Lim S. Angular- and polarization-insensitive metamaterial absorber using subwavelength unit cell in multilayer technology. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2016;15:414–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin W, Binzhen Z, Wanjun W, et al. Design, fabrication, and characterization of a flexible dual-band metamaterial absorber. IEEE Photon J. 2017;9:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai H, Zhan C, Li Z, et al. A triple-band ultrathin metamaterial absorber with wide-angle and polarization stability. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2015;14:241–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Gupta A. A wrenched-square shaped polarization independent and wide angle stable ultra-thin metamaterial absorber for S-band, X-band and Ku-band applications. AEU Int J Electron Commun. 2021;132:153648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari FS, Naderi M, Hatami A, et al. Microwave Jerusalem cross absorber by metamaterial split ring resonator load to obtain polarization independence with triple band application. AEU Int J Electron Commun. 2019;101:138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg P, Jain P. Novel ultrathin penta-band metamaterial absorber. AEU Int J Electron Commun. 2020;116:153063.
   Google Scholar
• Asgharian R, Zakeri B, Karimi O. Modified hexagonal triple-band metamaterial absorber with wide-angle stability. AEU Int J Electron Commun. 2018;87:119–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar