Multi-objective design method for high-power microwave source devices based on preferred PIC/gNSGA-II

References

• Levush B, Antonsen TM, Vlasov AN, et al. High-efficiency relativistic backward wave oscillator: theory and design. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 1996;24(03):843–851. doi:10.1109/27.533087
   Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Liu GZ, Song ZM, et al. Effects of axial guiding magnetic field on microwave power of relativistic backward oscillators. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2000;12(06):745–748.
   Google Scholar
• Liu GZ, Chen CH, Zhang YL. Relativistic backward-wave oscillator with coaxial extractor. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2001;13(04):467–470.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Liu GZ, Huang WH, et al. A repetitive X-band relativistic backward-wave oscillator. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2002;30(03):1108–1111. doi:10.1109/TPS.2002.801656
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Yan Y, Meng L. Backward wave oscillators with coaxial structure: dispersion characteristics and PIC simulation. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2006;18(07):1139–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Liao C, Zhou J, Liu DG, et al. Improved parallel algorithms for 3D PIC simulation. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2011;23(04):1020–1024. doi:10.3788/HPLPB20112304.1020
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall CK. Particle-in-cell charged-particle simulations, plus Monte Carlo collisions with neutral atoms, PIC-MCC. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 1991;19(02):65–85. doi:10.1109/27.106800
   Google Scholar
• Goplen B, Ludeking L, Smith D, et al. User-configurable MAGIC for electromagnetic PIC calculations. Comput Phys Commun. 1995;87(01):54–86. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00010-D
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZG, Wang JG, Wang Y, et al. Optimal design of high-power microwave source based on particle simulation and genetic algorithms. Acta Phys Sin. 2013;62(16):448–453.
   Google Scholar
• Wang HH, Liu DG, Meng L, et al. Particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for a relativistic backward wave oscillator. Chin J Comput Phys. 2014;31(04):479–485.
   Google Scholar
• Wang HH, Meng L, Liu DG, et al. Numerical optimization study of PIC/PSO for RBWO. Acta Phys Sin. 2013;62(13):505–512.
   Google Scholar
• Sun HF, Jiang YM, Dong Y, et al. Preliminary optimal design of high-power microwave devices. J Terahertz Sci Electro Inf Technol. 2013;11(06):927–941.
   Google Scholar
• Sun HF, Li HY, Jiang YM, et al. Automatic optimal design of magnetic insulated wire oscillator. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2014;26(04):23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Yang WJ, Li YD, Wang HG, et al. Multi-objective optimal design of high-power microwave source based on multi-criteria decision making. J Xi’an Jiao Tong Univ. 2023;01(01):01–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrotas G. Effective implementation of the ϵ-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput. 2009;213(2):455–465. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas N, Deb K. Muilti-objective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput. 1994;2(3):221–248. doi:10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;06(02):182–197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017
   Google Scholar
• Molina J, Santana LV, Hemandez-Daz AG, et al. g-dominance: reference point based dominance for multi-objective metaheuristics. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;197(2):685–692. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said LB, Bechikh S, Ghedira K. The r-dominance: A new dominance relation for interactive evolutionary multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2010;14(05):801–818. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2010.2041060
   Google Scholar
• Hu JJ, Yu G, Zheng J H, et al. A preference-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using preference selection radius. Soft Comp. 2017;21(17):5025–5051. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2099-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Liu DG, Liao C, et al. CHIPIC: An efficient code for electromagnetic PIC modeling and simulation. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2009;37(10):2002–2011. doi:10.1109/TPS.2009.2026477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao C, Li ZH, Zhou J, et al. Parallel 3D electromagnetic PIC simulation based on OpenMP. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2010;22(08):1919–1924. doi:10.3788/HPLPB20102208.1919
   Google Scholar
• Liao C, Liu DG, Liu SG. Three-dimensional electromagnetic particle-in-cell simulation by parallel computing. Acta Phys Sin. 2009;58(10):6709–6718. doi:10.7498/aps.58.6709
   Google Scholar
• Sun HF, Dong ZW, Jiang YM. Design and numerical simulation of a improved type MILO. High Power Laser Part Beams. 2003;15(12):1220–1224.
   Google Scholar
• Yang WY, Dong Y, Sun HF, et al. Design and numerical simulation of a improved type MILO. Acta Phys Sin. 2020;69(19):345–353.
   Google Scholar