Compressive testing of reinforced Nomex honeycomb at elevated temperatures

References

• Yokozeki T, Iwamoto K. Effects of core machining configuration on the debonding toughness of foam core sandwich panels. Adv Compos Mater. 2016;25:45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanakrishnan R, Samlal S, Joseph Stanley A, et al. Impact study on sandwich panels with and without stitching. Adv Compos Mater. 2018;27:163–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao L, Miura Y, Kemmochi K. Improving bending characteristics of FRP sandwich structures with reinforcement webs. Adv Compos Mater. 2018;27:221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Edwards PJ. Energy absorption in composite tubes. J Compos Mater. 1982;16:521–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Harwood JJ, Beardmore P. Fiber reinforced plastic composites for energy absorption purposes. Compos Sci Technol. 1985;24:275–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairfull AH. Scaling effects in the energy absorption of axially crushed composite tubes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Tao WH, Robertson RE, Thornton PH. Effects of material properties and crush conditions on the crush energy absorption of fiber composite rods. Compos Sci Technol. 1993;47:405–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee Paik J, Thayamballi AK, Sung Kim G. The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Thin Walled Struct. 1999;35:205–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktay L, Johnson AF, Kröplin BH. Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour. Eng Fract Mech. 2008;75:2616–2630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu E, Jiang WS. Axial crush of metallic honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng. 1997;19:439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith W, Sackman JL. An experimental study of energy absorption in impact on sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng. 1992;12:241–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Syed AK, Ijaz H, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of flexural and impact behaviour of glass/pp sandwich panel for automotive structural applications. Adv Compos Mater. 2018;27:367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton PH. Energy absorption in composite structures. J Compos Mater. 1979;13:247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamalis AG, Yuan YB, Viegelahn GL. Collapse of thin-wall composite sections subjected to high speed axial loading. Int J Veh Syst. 1992;13:564–579.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob GC, Fellers JF, Simunovic S, et al. Energy absorption in polymer composites for automotive crashworthiness. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:813–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada H, Coppola JC, Hull D, et al. Comparison of energy absorption of carbon/epoxy and carbon/PEEK composite tubes. Composites. 1992;23:245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada H, Ramakrishna S. Effect of fiber material on the energy absorption behavior of thermoplastic composite tubes. J Thermoplast Composite Mater. 1996;9:259–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MR, Hyer MW. Static energy absorption capacity of graphite-epoxy tubes. J Compos Mater. 2001;35:1747–1761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley GL. Energy absorption of composite materials. J Compos Mater. 1983;17:267–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmueser DW, Wickliffe LE. Impact energy absorption of continuous fiber composite tubes. J Eng Mater Technol. 1987;109:72–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley GL. Effect of specimen geometry on the energy absorption capability of composite materials. J Compos Mater. 1986;20:390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu CH, Lu CK, Wu CM. Crushing characteristics of 3-D braided composite square tubes. J Compos Mater. 1997;31:2309–2327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey DD, Vizzini AJ. Energy absorption of composite plates and tubes. J Compos Mater. 1998;32:158–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda M, Akiyama M. Compression test of a single carbon fiber in a scanning electron microscope and its evaluation via finite element analysis. Adv Compos Mater. 2019;28:57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alantali A, Alia RA, Umer R, et al. Energy absorption in aluminium honeycomb cores reinforced with carbon fibre reinforced plastic tubes. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2019, 2801–2815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alia RA, Rao S, Umer R, et al. The crushing characteristics of reinforced Nomex honeycomb. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2018;37:1267–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Ueda M, Iizuka K, et al. Simulation on kink-band formation during axial compression of a unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced plastic constructed by X-ray computed tomography images. Adv Compos Mater. 2019;28:347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada H, Ramakrishna S, Sato H. Effect of testing temperature on the energy absorption behavior of carbon fiber/PEEK composite tubes. J Reinf Plast Compos. 1996;15:30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada H, Ramakrishna S, Nakamura M, et al. Progressive crushing behaviour of glass/epoxy composite tubes with different surface treatment. J Compos Interfaces. 1994;2:127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lee HS, Hong SH, Lee JR, et al. Mechanical behavior and failure process during compressive and shear deformation of honeycomb composite at elevated temperatures. J Mater Sci. 2002;37:1265–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar