Failure analysis of laminated composites subjected to flexural loadings

References

• Akbulut M, Sonmez FO. Design optimization of laminated composites using a new variant of simulated annealing. Comput Struct. 2011;89(17):1712–1724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton MJ, Soden PD. Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise. Compos Sci Technol. 1998;58(7):1001–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS, Soden PD. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence. Compos Sci Technol. 2002;62(12):1725–1797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS, Soden PD. A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64(3):549–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuntze RG, Freund A. The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64(3):343–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinoviev PA, Grigoriev SV, Lebedeva OV, et al. The strength of multilayered composites under a plane-stress state. Compos Sci Technol. 1998;58(7):1209–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetti TA, Hoppel CP, Harik VM, et al. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64(3):329–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu KS, Tsai SW. A progressive quadratic failure criterion for a laminate. Compos Sci Technol. 1998;58(7):1023–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ, Smith PA, et al. A comparison between the predictive capability of matrix cracking, damage and failure criteria for fiber reinforced composite laminates: part A of the third world-wide failure exercise. J Compos Mater. 2013;47(20–21):2749–2779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greif R, Chapon E. Investigation of successive failure modes in graphite/epoxy laminated composite beams. J Reinf Plast Compos. 1993;12(5):602–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam TY, Jan TB. First-ply failure analysis of laminated composite plates based on the layerwise linear displacement theory. Compos Struct. 1995;32(1–4):583–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icardi U, Locatto S, Longo A. Assessment of recent theories for predicting failure of composite laminates. Appl Mech Rev. 2007;60(2):76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Irhirane EH, Abousaleh M, Echaabi J, et al. Modeling and simulation of the failure and stiffness degradation of a graphite epoxy in a three-point bending test. J Eng Mater Technol. 2010;132:0310131–03101318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellul B, Camilleri D, Betts JC. A progressive failure analysis applied to fiber-reinforced composite plates subject to out-of-plane bending. Mech Compos Mater. 2014;49(6):605–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Syed AK, Ijaz H, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of flexural and impact behavior of glass/pp sandwich panel for automotive structural applications. Adv Compos Mater. 2018;27(4):367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todoroki AMizutani Y, et al. Bending fracture rule for 3d-printed curved continuous-fiber composite. Adv Compos Mater. 2019;28(4):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Roh JH. Two-dimensional strain-based interactive failure theory for multidirectional composite laminates. Compos Part B Eng. 2015;69:69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. New Jersey (NJ):Prentice Hall; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Chao WC, Reddy JN. Analysis of laminated composites shells using a degenerated 3-D element. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 1984;20:1991–2007.
   Google Scholar
• Crisfield MA. A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles “snap-through. Coputer & Structuctures. 1981;13:55–62.
   Google Scholar
• MSC. Nastran. 2014. Nonlinear User's Guide SOL 400. MSC Software Corporation. Santa Ana. California (CA). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D3039/D3039M-14. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Philadelphia (PA), 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6641/D6641M-16. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a Combined Loading Compression (CLC) test fixture. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Philadelphia (PA), 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D3518/D3518M-13. Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ±45° laminate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Philadelphia (PA), 2018.
   Google Scholar