Inverse estimation method for internal defects based on surface stress of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics using machine learning

References

• Ning FD, Cong WL, Pei ZJ, et al. Rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP: a comparison with grinding. Ultrasonics. 2016;66:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen RM. Mechanics of composite materials. Courier Corporation; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Scarponi C, Briotti G. Ultrasonic technique for the evaluation of delaminations on CFRP, GFRP, KFRP composite materials. Compos Part B Eng. 2000;31(3):237–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng K, Chang YS, Wang KH, et al. Improved non-destructive testing of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites using pulsed thermograph. Polym Test. 2015;46:26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud AM, Ammar HH, Mukdadi OM, et al. Non-destructive ultrasonic evaluation of CFRP–concrete specimens subjected to accelerated aging conditions. NDT E Int. 2010;43(7):635–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanan SV, Bulavinov A, Pudovikov S, et al. (2010, November). Quantitative non-destructive evaluation of CFRP components by sampling phased array. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim ME, Smith RA, Wang CH. Ultrasonic detection and sizing of compressed cracks in glass-and carbon-fibre reinforced plastic composites. NDT E Int. 2017;92:111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hong SC, Lee JR, et al. Corner inspection method for L-shaped composite structures using laser ultrasonic rotational scanning technique. Adv Compos Mater. 2021;30(5):431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizukami K, Ikeda T, Ogi K. Ultrasonic guided wave technique for monitoring cure-dependent viscoelastic properties of carbon fiber composites with toughened interlaminar layers. Adv Compos Mater. 2021;30(sup2):85–105.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan MTH, Worden K, Pierce SG, et al. On impact damage detection and quantification for CFRP laminates using structural response data only. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2011;25(8):3135–3152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilonardo E, Nacucchi M, De Pascalis F, et al. High resolution X-ray computed tomography: a versatile non-destructive tool to characterize CFRP-based aircraft composite elements. Compos Sci Technol. 2020;192:108093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mook G, Pohl J, Michel F. Non-destructive characterization of smart CFRP structures. Smart Mater Struct. 2003;12(6):997.
   Google Scholar
• Revol V, Plank B, Kaufmann R, et al. Laminate fibre structure characterisation of carbon fibre-reinforced polymers by X-ray scatter dark field imaging with a grating interferometer. NDT E Int. 2013;58:64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama K, Hoshikawa H, Hirano T (2011, November). Investigation of impact damage of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) by eddy current non-destructive testing. In International Workshop Smart Materials, Structures & NDT in Aerospace (pp. 2–4).
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Tian G, Pan M, et al. Non-destructive testing of low-energy impact in CFRP laminates and interior defects in honeycomb sandwich using scanning pulsed eddy current. Compos Part B Eng. 2014;59:196–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mook G, Lange R, Koeser O. Non-destructive characterisation of carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics by means of eddy-currents. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61(6):865–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Cheng F, Yang F, et al. Non-destructive testing for carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) using a novel eddy current probe. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;177:107460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Ji H, Qiu J, et al. Interlaminar contact resistivity and its influence on eddy currents in carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminates. NDT E Int. 2018;94:79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi Q, Tian GY, Malekmohammadi H, et al. New features for delamination depth evaluation in carbon fiber reinforced plastic materials using eddy current pulse-compression thermography. NDT E Int. 2019;102:264–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß M, Ilse D, Hillger W, et al. Numerical simulation of the propagation of Lamb waves and their interaction with defects in C-FRP laminates for non-destructive testing. Adv Compos Mater. 2020;29(5):423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakagami T, Kubo S. Applications of pulse heating thermography and lock-in thermography to quantitative nondestructive evaluations. Infrared Phys Technol. 2002;43(3–5):211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakagami T, Kubo S. Development of a new non-destructive testing technique for quantitative evaluations of delamination defects in concrete structures based on phase delay measurement using lock-in thermography. Infrared Phys Technol. 2002;43(3–5):311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinlong G, Junyan L, Fei W, et al. Inverse heat transfer approach for nondestructive estimation the size and depth of subsurface defects of CFRP composite using lock-in thermography. Infrared Phys Technol. 2015;71:439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junyan L, Yang L, Fei W, et al. Study on probability of detection (POD) determination using lock-in thermography for nondestructive inspection (NDI) of CFRP composite materials. Infrared Phys Technol. 2015;71:448–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier A, Schmidt R, Oswald-Tranta B, et al. Non-destructive thermography analysis of impact damage on large-scale CFRP automotive parts. Materials. 2014;7(1):413–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marani R, Palumbo D, Renò V, et al. Modeling and classification of defects in CFRP laminates by thermal non-destructive testing. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;135:129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiderski W. Non-destructive testing of CFRP by laser excited thermography. Compos Struct. 2019;209:710–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popow V, Gurka M. Full factorial analysis of the accuracy of automated quantification of hidden defects in an anisotropic carbon fibre reinforced composite shell using pulse phase thermography. NDT E Int. 2020;116:102359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu E, Gao Q, Li M, et al. Study on in-plane thermal conduction of woven carbon fiber reinforced polymer by infrared thermography. NDT E Int. 2018;94:56–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidangan RT, Krishnamurthy CV, Balasubramaniam K. Identification of the fiber breakage orientation in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites using induction thermography. NDT E Int. 2021;122:102498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa M, Hatta H, Habuka Y, et al. Effect of anisotropic properties on defect detection by pulse phase thermography. Adv Compos Mater. 2012;21(1):67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YS, Yan Z, Wang KH, et al. Non-destructive testing of CFRP using pulsed thermography and multi-dimensional ensemble empirical mode decomposition. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;61:54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakagami T, Izumi Y, Shiozawa D, et al. Nondestructive evaluation of fatigue cracks in steel bridges based on thermoelastic stress measurement. Procedia Struct Integr. 2016;2:2132–2139.
   Google Scholar
• Muramatsu M, Harada Y, Suzuki T, et al. Infrared stress measurements of thermal damage to laser-processed carbon fiber reinforced plastics. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;68:242–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muramatsu M, Nakasumi S, Harada Y. Characterization of defects in carbon fiber-reinforced plastics by inverse heat conduction analysis using transfer matrix between layers. Adv Compos Mater. 2016;25(6):541–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byon O, Nishi Y. Damage identification of CFRP laminated cantilever beam by using neural network. In: Key engineering materials. Vol. 141. Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 1998. p. 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. MIT Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• McInnes L, Healy J, Melville J (2018). UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma DP, Welling M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. (2013) arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Zheng Y, Tan H, et al. (2016). Variational deep embedding: an unsupervised and generative approach to clustering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05148.
   Google Scholar
• Darabi A, Maldague X. Neural network based defect detection and depth estimation in TNDE. NDT E Int. 2002;35(3):165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumika Acryl Co. Ltd. “SUMIPEX TECHSHEET”. https://www.sumika-acryl.co.jp ( accessed on 3/8/2020).
   Google Scholar
• Davila C, Camanho P (2003, April). Analysis of the effects of residual strains and defects on skin/stiffener debonding using decohesion elements. In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference (p. 1465).
   Google Scholar