Experimental investigation on interlaminar tension strength of curved composite laminates subjected to four-point bending load

References

• Iwahori Y, Nakane K, Watanabe N. DCB test simulation of stitched CFRP laminates using interlaminar tension test results. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69(14):2315–2322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian S, Liu X, Ye Y, et al. Effect of gap and overlap fiber placement defects on the delamination behavior of L-shaped composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2021;268:113963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis JP, de Moura MFSF, Moreira RDF, et al. Pure mode I and II interlaminar fracture characterization of carbon-fibre reinforced polyamide composite. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;169:126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Xie L, Li C, et al. An analytical and experimental study of T - shaped composite stiffened panels: effect of 90° plies in stringers on curing and buckling performance. Appl Compos Mater. 2020;27(5):597–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie GN, Liu J, Zang WH, et al. Simulation and improvement of temperature distributions of a framed mould during the autoclave composite curing process. J Eng Thermophys. 2013;22(1):43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber TA, Arent J-C, Münch L, et al. A fast method for the generation of boundary conditions for thermal autoclave simulation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;88:216–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranz D, Cuartero J, Miravete A, et al. Experimental research into interlaminar tensile strength of carbon/epoxy laminated curved beams. Compos Struct. 2017;164:189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui W, Tao L, Len J, et al. Interlaminar tensile strength (ILTS) measurement of woven glass/polyester laminates using four-point curved beam specimen. JCPAAS Manuf. 1996;27:1097–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivakumar KN, Allen HG, Avva VS. Interlaminar tension strength of graphite/epoxy composite laminates. AIAA Stud J. 1994;32(7):1478–1484.
   Google Scholar
• Niu CY. Airframe structural design - practical design information. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtaran H. Geometrically nonlinear transient analysis of thick deep composite curved beams with generalized differential quadrature method. Compos Struct. 2015;128:241–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu CY. Composite airframe structures: practical design information and data. HongKong: Hong Kong Conmilit Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle A, Wowk D, Marsden C. Three-dimensional modelling of interlaminar normal stresses in curved laminate components. Compos Struct. 2020;242:112165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel L, Garcia S, Yao C, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of delamination in curved-beam multidirectional laminated composite specimen. Key Eng Mater. 2013;577-578:389–392.
   Google Scholar
• Seon G, Makeev A, Nikishkov Y, et al. Effects of defects on interlaminar tensile fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2013;89:194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahuerta F, Nijssen RPL, van der Meer FP, et al. The influence of curing cycle and through thickness variability of properties in thick laminates. J Compos Mater. 2016;51(4):563–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attukur Nandagopal R, Gin Boay C, Narasimalu S. An empirical model to predict the strength degradation of the hygrothermal aged CFRP material. Compos Struct. 2020;236:111876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Zhao Z, Chen W, et al. Interlaminar shear property and high-velocity impact resistance of CFRP laminates after cyclic hygrothermal aging. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019;25(3):307–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedward KT, Wilson RS, McLean SK. Flexure of simply curved composite shapes. Composites. 1989;20(6):527–536.
   Google Scholar
• Suganyadevi S, Singh BN. Improved zigzag theories for laminated composite and sandwich plates with interlaminar shear stress continuity. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2016;52:243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani Sarvestani H, Yazdani Sarvestani M. Interlaminar stress analysis of general composite laminates. Int J Mech Sci. 2011;53(11):958–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puppo A, Evensen H. Interlaminar shear in laminated composites under generalized plane stress. Compos Mater. 1970;4(2):204–220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciuva MD. Multilayered anisotropic plate models with continuous interlaminar stresses. Compos Struct. 1992;22(3):149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipes RB, Pagano NJ. Interlaminar stresses in composite laminates—An approximate elasticity solution. J Appl Mech. 1974;41(3):668–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Choi I. Boundary-layer effects in composite laminates: part 1—Free-edge stress singularities. J Appl Mech. 1982;49(3):541–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Cantero JM, Graciani E, Blázquez A, et al. A new analytical model for evaluating interlaminar stresses in the unfolding failure of composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2016;147:260–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosier A, Bahrami A. Interlaminar stresses in antisymmetric angle-ply laminates. Compos Struct. 2007;78(1):18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen K-H, H-W J, Truong V-H, et al. Delamination analysis of multi-angle composite curved beams using an out-of-autoclave material. Compos Struct. 2018;183:320–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geleta TN, Woo K, Lee B. Delamination behavior of L-shaped laminated composites. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci. 2018;19(2):363–374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao D, Duan Q, Hu H, et al. Computational investigation of both intra-laminar matrix cracking and inter-laminar delamination of curved composite components with cohesive elements. Compos Struct. 2018;192:300–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo T, Goto T, Takahashi J. Investigation about the fracture behavior and strength in a curved section of CF/PP composite by a thin-curved beam specimen. Adv Compos Mater. 2014;24(3):249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumaquero PL, Justo J, Graciani E. On the thickness dependence of ILTS in curved composite laminates. Key Eng Mater. 2018;774:523–528.
   Google Scholar
• Makeev A, Seon G, Nikishkov Y, et al. Methods for assessment of interlaminar tensile strength of composite materials. J Compos Mater. 2014;49(7):783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D 7291-07. Through-thickness ‘flatwise’ tensile strength and elastic modulus of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite material. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials;2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roos R, Kress G, Barbezat M, et al. Enhanced model for interlaminar normal stress in singly curved laminates. Compos Struct. 2007;80(3):327–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara E, Yokozeki T, Hatta H, et al. Comparison of out-of-plane tensile strengths of aligned CFRP obtained by 3-point bending and direct loading tests. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2012;43(11):1828–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vänttinen A. Strength prediction of composite rib foot corner. Helsinki:Helsinki University of Technology;2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lekhnitskij SG, Fern P, Brandstatter JJ, Dill EH. Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic elastic body. Physics Today. 1964;17(1):84.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6415/D6425M. Standard test method for measuring the curved beam strength of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Advisory circular, composite aircraft structure. AC20-107B: Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Composite materials handbook volume 1: polymer matrix composites guidelines for characterization of structural materials, CMH-17-1G. Washington, DC:US-SAE;2012.
   Google Scholar
• China Aeronautical Research Institute, Composites structural design manual. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Composite materials handbook volume 3: polymer matrix composites materials usage, design, and analysis, CMH-17-3G. Washington, DC: US-SAE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan MH, Othman AR, Kamaruddin S. A review on the manufacturing defects of complex-shaped laminate in aircraft composite structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;91(9–12):4081–4094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Pickering E, Bo A, et al. Characterisation on the hygrothermal degradation in the mechanical property of structural adhesive: a novel meso-scale approach. Compos Part B Eng. 2020;182:107609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Akhmet G, Hu P, et al. Numerical prediction on the mechanical degradation of adhesively bonded corrugated sandwich beam after hygrothermal ageing. Compos Struct. 2020;241:112131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng M, Rizvi MJ, Grove SM, et al. Effects of hygrothermal stress on the failure of CFRP composites. Compos Struct. 2015;133:1024–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D5229/5229M. Standard test method for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymer matrix composite materials. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Li S, Chang F, et al. An experimental and numerical analysis for stiffened composite panel subjected to shear loading in hygrothermal environment. Compos Struct. 2016;138:107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Feng Y, He Y, et al. Effects of hygrothermal environment on the shear behavior of composite stiffened panels. Compos Struct. 2021;258:113341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Zhao Z, Chen W, et al. An experimental investigation on high velocity impact behavior of hygrothermal aged CFRP composites. Compos Struct. 2018;204:645–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large aeroplanes, CS-25. Agency EAS; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds TG. Accelerated tests of environmental degradation in composite materials. Bristol (UK): Composite Structures: Theory and Practice;1998.
   Google Scholar
• Fan XJ, Lee SWR, Han Q. Experimental investigations and model study of moisture behaviors in polymeric materials. Microelectron Reliab. 2009;49(8):861–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Jones MI, Ali H, et al. Effect of out-of-plane wrinkles in curved multi-directional carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2020;197:108282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao D, Hu H, Duan Q, et al. Experimental and three-dimensional numerical investigation of matrix cracking and delamination interaction with edge effect of curved composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2019;225:111154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Cantero JM, Graciani E, López-Romano B, et al. Competing mechanisms in the unfolding failure in composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;156:223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer G, Kitzmüller W, Pinter G, et al. Computational and experimental investigation of delamination in L-shaped laminated composite components. Eng Fract Mech. 2009;76(18):2810–2820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chen XW, Wang HP, et al., Statistic-based calculation methods of B-basis value of composites. Fail Anal Prev. 2010;4:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mára V, Michalcová L, Kadlec M, et al. The effect of long-time moisture exposure and low temperatures on mechanical behavior of open-hole CFRP laminate. Polym Composites. 2021;42(7):3603–3618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi AR, Tabatabaeian A, Moradi M. Residual stress and failure analyses of polymer matrix composites considering thermal cycling and temperature effects based on classical laminate plate theory. J Compos Mater. 2018;53(21):3021–3032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wencheng L. Principles for determining material allowable and design allowable values of composite aircraft structures. Procedia Eng. 2011;17:279–285.
   Google Scholar
• Agency EAS. Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large Aeroplanes CS-25. 2011.
   Google Scholar