894
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Professional inquiry for inclusive education: learning amidst institutional and professional boundaries

, &

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435
  • Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Journal of Language Arts, 84, 357–364.
  • Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., & Waitoller, F. R. (Eds.). (2011). Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
  • Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. (2001). Grounded Theory in ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, A. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 160–174). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
  • Clough, P. (2000). Routes to inclusion. In P. Clough & J. Corbett (Eds.), Theories of inclusive education: A students’ guide (pp. 1–33). London: Sage.
  • Corbett, J., & Slee, R. (2000). An international conversation on inclusive education. In F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong, & L. Barton (Eds.), Inclusive education: Policy, contexts and comparative perspectives (pp. 133–146). London: David Fulton.
  • Drake, S. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Drake, S., & Burns, R. (2004). Meeting standards though integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Edwards, A. (2007). Relational agency in professional practice: A CHAT analysis. An International Journal of Human Activity Theory 1, 1–17.
  • Edwards, A., & D’arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56, 147–155.
  • Edwards, A., Lunt, I., & Stamou, E. (2010). Inter-professional work and expertise: New roles at the boundaries of schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 27–45. doi:10.1080/01411920902834134
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinky: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
  • Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytical lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
  • Gee, J. P. (2001). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 100–117.
  • Knapp, M. S. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27, 109–157. doi:10.3102/0091732x027001109
  • Kerosuo, H. (2001). “Boundary encounters” as a place for learning and development at work. Outlines, 3(1), 53–65.
  • Kerosuo, H. (2004). Examining boundaries in health care – Outline of a method for studying organizational boundaries in interaction. Outlines, 6(1), 35–60.
  • Kozleski, E. B. (2011). Dialectical practices in education: Creating third spaces in the education of teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 250–259.
  • Kozleski, E. B., & Huber, J. J., (2010). Systemic change for RTI: Key shifts for practice. Theory into Practice, 49, 258–264.
  • Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, literacy and learning: Blooming in the midst of the whirlwind. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
  • Rosenberg, M. S., Brownell, M., McCray, E. D., deBettencourt, L. U., Leko, M., & Long, S. (2009). Development and sustainability of school-university partnerships in special education teacher preparation: A critical review of the literature. University of Florida, National Center to Inform Policy and Practice in Special Education Professional Development. Retrieved from http://ncipp.education.ufl.edu/files_5/NCIPP%20Partnership%20Executive%20Summary%20Final.pdf
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Waitoller, F. R., & Artiles, A. J. (2013). A decade professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83, 319–356.
  • Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013a). Understanding and dismantling barriers for partnerships for inclusive education: A cultural historical activity theory perspective. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 9, 23–42.
  • Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013b). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35–45.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, J., Corbin, B., & McNamara, O. (2007). Finding inquiry in discourses of audit and reform in primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.07.006

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.