Short-run effects of accountability pressures on teacher policies and practices in the voucher system in Santiago, Chile

References

• Ahn, T., & Vigdor, J. (2009). Does No Child Left Behind have teeth? Examining the impact of federal accountability sanctions in North Carolina. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: Educational triage and the Texas Accountability System. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231–268. doi:10.3102/00028312042002231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgon, R., Gentleman, R., & Huber, W. (2010). Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9546–9551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, R. (2003). Can failing schools be fixed? Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305–331. doi:10.3102/01623737024004305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, R. (2008). Impact of voucher design on public school performance: Evidence from Florida and Milwaukee Voucher Program (Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 315). Retrieved from http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr315.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chay, K., McEwan, P., & Urquiola, M. (2005). The central role of noise in evaluating interventions that use test scores to rank schools. The American Economic Review, 95, 1237–1258. doi:10.1257/0002828054825529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system (NBER Working Paper No. 12286). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12286
   Google Scholar
• Deming, D., Cohodes, S., Jennings, J., & Jencks, C. (2013). School accountability, postsecondary attainment and earnings (NBER Working Paper No. 19444). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19444
   Google Scholar
• Elacqua, G., & Santos, H. (2013). Revealed preferences of private school owners in Chile: The case of Adjusted Voucher Law. Gestión y Política Pública, 22, 85–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, R., & Borko, H. (1999). Hands-on pedagogy vs. hands-off accountability: Tensions between competing commitments for exemplary math teachers in Kentucky. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 394–400. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439455
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F., Abelman, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65–98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N. (2006). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 837–851. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S. (2006). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system? In T. J. Gronberg & D. W. Jansen (Eds.), Improving school accountability (Advances in applied microeconomics, Vol. 14) (pp. 35–49). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D.N., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Economics of education (pp. 383–421). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Lucas, M. E. (2004). Whats in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. The American Economic Review, 94, 591–604. doi:10.1257/0002828041464489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Rouse, C. E. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 90, 239–255. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, B., Lockwood, J., Martorell, F., Setodji, C. M., Booker, K., Vernez, G., … Garet, M. S. (2009). An exploratory analysis of adequate yearly progress, identification for improvement, and student achievement in two states and three cities (Technical Report U.S. Department of Education). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/rd-ayp/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Hannaway, J. (2004). Accountability with a kicker: Observations on the Florida A+ accountability plan. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 598–605. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20441651
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. P., & Winters, M. A. (2003). When schools compete: The effect of vouchers on Florida public school achievement (Manhattan Institute Education Working Paper No. 2). Retrieved from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/ewp_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Robyn, A., Russel, J., … Barney, H. (2007). Standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of teachers and administrators in three states. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG589.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hannaway, J., & Cohodes, S. (2007). Trouble even in choice paradise: NCLB in Miami-Dade county public schools. In F. M. Hess & C. E. Finn (Eds.), No remedy left behind: Lessons from a half-decade of NCLB (pp. 244–264). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaway, J., & Hamilton, L. (2008). Performance-based accountability policies: Implications for school and classroom practices. Washington, DC: Urban Institute and RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/411779-Accountability-Policies.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. (2003). Lessons about the design of state accountability systems. In E. Peterson & M. West (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of accountability (pp. 126–151). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297–327. doi:10.1002/pam.20091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615–635. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G., & Zajonc, T. (2011). Regression discontinuity design with multiple forcing variables. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761–796. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 843–877. doi:10.1162/00335530360698441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & McCaffrey, D. (1994). The Vermont Portafolio Assessment Program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement Issues and Practices 13(3), 5–16. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1994.tb00443.x
   Google Scholar
• Koschoreck, J. W. (2001). Accountability and educational equity in the transformation of an urban district. Education and Urban Society, 33, 284–304. doi:10.1177/0013124501333004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., & Glennie, E. (2001). A replication of Jay Greene’s voucher effect study using North Carolina data. In M. Carnoy (Ed.), Do school vouchers improve student performance? (pp. 49–52). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., & Zelli, A. (2002). School-based accountability in North Carolina: The responses of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 494–529. doi:10.1177/001316102237670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 675–697. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281–355. doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martorell, F. (2005). Do high school graduation exams matter? Evaluating the effects of exit exam performance on student outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 698–714. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Sparky House.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H. (2012). Bridging accountability obligations, professional values and (perceived) student needs with integrity. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 695–726. doi:10.1108/09578231211249871
   Google Scholar
• Mizala, A., Romaguera, P., & Urquiola, M. (2007). Socioeconomic status or noise? Tradeoffs in the generation of school quality information. Journal of Development Economics, 84, 61–75. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizala, A., & Urquiola, M. (2013). School markets: The impact of information approximating schools’ effectiveness. Journal of Development Economics 103, 313–335. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Neal, D., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2007). Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability (NBER Working Paper No. 13293). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13293
   Google Scholar
• O’Day, J. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 293–329. Retrieved from http://her.hepg.org/content/021q742t8182h238/
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P., Willett, J. B., & Murnane, R. J. (2011). Extending the regression-discontinuity approach to multiple assignment variables. Journal of Econometrics, 161, 203–207. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedulla, J., Abrams, L., Madaus, G., Russell, M., Ramos, M., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston, MA: National Board on Education Testing and Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The life and death of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., Arshan, N., Atteberry, A., & Kurlaender, M. (2010). Effects of failing a high school exit exam on course taking, achievement, persistence, and graduation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 498–520. doi:10.3102/0162373710382655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F, & Robinson, J. (2012). Regression discontinuity designs with multiple rating-score variables. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 83–104. doi:10.1080/19345747.2011.609583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reback, R., Rockoff, J., & Schwartz, H. L. (2011). Under pressure: Job security, resource allocation, and productivity in schools under NCLB (NBER Working Paper No. 16745). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w16745
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P. (2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 267–292. doi:10.3102/0162373711407912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockoff, J., & Turner, L. (2010). Short-run impacts of accountability on school quality. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2, 119–147. doi:10.1257/pol.2.4.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romberg, T., Zarinnia, A., & Williams, S. (1989). The influence of mandated testing on mathematics instruction: Grade 8 teachers’ perceptions. Madison, WI: National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, C. E., Hannaway, J, Goldhaber, D., & Figlio, D. (2013). Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(2), 251–281. doi:10.1257/pol.5.2.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheurich, J. J., Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 293–299. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439884
   Google Scholar
• Schochet, P. Z. (2009). Statistical power for regression discontinuity designs in education evaluations. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 238–266. doi:10.3102/1076998609332748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L., & Dougherty, K. (1991, April). Effects of high-stakes testing on instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Smarick, A. (2010). The turnaround fallacy. Education Next, 10, 20–26. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/the-turnaround-fallacy/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., & Rottenberg, C. (1991). Unintended consequences of external testing in elementary schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), 7–11. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00210.x
   Google Scholar
• Spreng, C. (2005). Policy options for interventions in failing schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M., & Barron, S. (2001). Unintended consequences of test-based accountability when testing in “milepost” grades. Educational Assessment, 7, 259–281. doi:10.1207/S15326977EA0704_02
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M., Barron, S. L., Chun, T., & Ross, K. (2000). The effects of the Washington state education reform on schools and classrooms. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. R., & Peterson, P. E. (2006). The efficacy of choice threats within school accountability systems: Results from legislatively induced experiments. The Economic Journal, 116, C46–C62. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S., Borko, H., McIver, M., & Elliott, R. (1999). No excuses: School reform efforts in exemplary schools of Kentucky. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, V., Steiner, P., & Cook, T. (2013). Analyzing regression-discontinuity designs with multiple assignment variables: A comparative study of four methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 107–141. doi:10.3102/1076998611432172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar