“It didn’t make me a better teacher”: inservice teacher constructions of dilemmas in high-stakes teacher evaluation

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44. doi: 10.1177/0895904803260022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. R. P. (2016). Invasion of the body snatchers: Pedagogicide and teacher evaluation in the age of accountability. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 18(2), 139–154. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1826910406
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. doi: 10.3102/0162373716670260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., & Dadey, N. (2017). Principal holistic judgments and high-stakes evaluations of teachers. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 155–178. doi: 10.1007/s11092-016-9256-7
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H., & Saran, R. (Eds.). (1995). Managing teachers as professionals in schools. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Cannata, M., Rubin, M., Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Neumerski, C. M., Drake, T. A., & Schuermann, P. (2017). Using teacher effectiveness data for information-rich hiring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 180–222. doi: 10.1177/0013161X16681629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories. Stories of teachers. School stories. Stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30. doi: 10.2307/1176665
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V. (2005). We’re all very liberal in our views: Students talk about lesbian and gay parenting. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 6(1), 2–15. Retrieved from http://www.bpsshop.org.uk/Lesbian-Gay-Psychology-Review-Vol-6-No-1-March-2005-P784.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23(2), 145–170. doi: 10.3102/01623737023002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The politics of teacher education and the curse of complexity. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 181–185. doi: 10.1177/0022487105276411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329. doi: 10.3102/01623737012003311
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378–387. doi: 10.3102/0013189X16659442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2012). It’s your evaluation: Collaborating to improve teacher practice. The Education Digest, 77(8), 22–27. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1008666043
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher evaluation in transition: Emerging roles and evolving methods. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 17–34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). Teachers’ responses to success for all: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799. doi: 10.3102/00028312037003775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2015). Implementing new teacher evaluation systems: Principals’ concerns and supervisor support. Journal of Educational Change, 16(3), 305–326. doi: 10.1007/s10833-015-9244-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2018). High-stakes teacher evaluation policy: US principals’ perspectives and variations in practice. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(3), 246–262. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2017.1421164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, K. M., & Jacobs, S. (2013). State of the States 2013: Connect the dots: Using evaluations of teacher effectiveness to inform policy and practice. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. P. (2012). Reforming teacher evaluation: One district’s story. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. P. (2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, T. A., Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Cannata, M., Neumerski, C. M., Rubin, M., & Schuermann, P. (2016). Development or dismissal? Exploring principals’ use of teacher effectiveness. In J. A. Grissom & P. Youngs (Eds.), Improving teacher evaluation systems: Making the most of multiple measures (pp. 116–130). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. No. 114-95, S-1177-2 Stat. (December 10, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: Lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416–431. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, T. G., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. C. (2017). Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31(2), 202–248. doi: 10.1177/0895904815586855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, R. E. (2017). Constructing teacher effectiveness in policymaking conversations. In J. N. Lester, C. R. Lochmiller, & R. E. Gabriel (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on education policy and implementation (pp. 219–239). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Ruben, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15575031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470. doi: 10.1086/669901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2015). Editors’ introduction: The use of teacher value-added measures in schools: New evidence, unanswered questions, and future prospects. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 71–76. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15576142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 219–245. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. (2016). Teacher voice: How teachers perceive evaluations and how leaders can use this knowledge to help teachers grow professionally. NASSP Bulletin, 100(1), 5–25. doi: 10.1177/0192636516670771
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G., & Skedsmo, G. (2016). Teacher evaluation – Accountability and improving teaching practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 105–109. doi: 10.1007/s11092-016-9241-1
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63–92). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (Ed.). (2010). Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Youngs, P. (2016). Promoting instructional improvement or resistance? A comparative study of teachers’ perceptions of teacher evaluation policy in Korea and the USA. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 46(5), 723–744. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2015.1057478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2017). Revisiting The Widget Effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249. doi: 10.3102/0013189X17718797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1979). Humanistic education vs. professional education: Further comments. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 19(3), 17–25. doi: 10.1177/002216787901900307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, B. (2014). Staffing for success: Linking teacher evaluation and school personnel management in practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 207–227. doi: 10.3102/0162373713506552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnici, A. (2014). The mind shift in teacher evaluation: Where we stand – And where we need to go. American Educator, 38(1), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., Van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art – Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231–256. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (1997). On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 25(3), 250–258. doi: 10.1177/007542429702500307
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141. doi: 10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Haynes, N. J., Mintz, S., & La Paro, K. M. (2006). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological and biological (Vol. 2, pp. 111–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). The Brown legacy and the O’Connor challenge: Transforming schools in the images of children’s potential. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 169–180. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09334840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., Peters, S., Alperin, A., Ketter, R. J., & Kurz, A. (2018). Teachers’ and school administrators’ attitudes and beliefs of teacher evaluation: A preliminary investigation of high poverty school districts. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30(1), 47–70. doi: 10.1007/s11092-017-9263-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., & Croninger, R. G. (2005). Resource generation, reallocation, or depletion: An analysis of the impact of reconstitution on school capacity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(2), 73–103. doi: 10.1080/15700760590965569
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. J., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949–965. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G., & Huber, S. G. (2018). Teacher evaluation: The need for valid measures and increased teacher involvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11092-018-9273-9
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. W., & Ussher, J. M. (2001). Making sense of S&M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities, 4(3), 293–314. doi: 10.1177/136346001004003002
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2018). 2018 Tennessee Educator Survey. Retrieved from http://educatorsurvey.tnk12.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee State Board of Education. (2017, July 28). Teacher and administrator evaluation policy. Retrieved from https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/stateboardofeducation/documents/policies/5000/5.20120Teacher20and20Principal20Evaluation20Policy207-28-17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 509–530. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2013.842601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 23(1), 6–24. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A. N., & Ward, N. A. (2018). “This is my new normal”: Teachers’ accounts of evaluation policy at local school board meetings. Journal of Education Policy, 33(6), 840–860. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1390164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherley, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special-education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 171–197. doi: 10.17763/haer.47.2.v870r1v16786270x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, S. A., Tsai, C.-L., Grajeda, S. B., & Bergin, C. (2018). Principals’ use of rating scale categories in classroom observations for teacher evaluation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(3), 485–510. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2018.1470989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, N. (2014). Teaching the whole child: Instructional practices that support social-emotional learning in three teacher evaluation frameworks (Research-to-Practice Brief). Washington, DC: Center on Great Teachers & Leaders, American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar