Quality of teaching at secondary schools in Nicaragua, South Korea, and the Netherlands

References

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/508733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar, E. (2013). The art of coaching: Effective strategies for school transformation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, B., Marzano, R., & Toth, M. (2017). The Marzano focused teacher evaluation model: A focused, scientific-behavioral evaluation model for standards-based classrooms. Marzano Center.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, S. (2021). 대한민국의 교육기적 [Education miracle in the Republic of Korea] CNU press. https://product.kyobobook.co.kr/detail/S000001833217
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for Renaissance schools. Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, K. (1995). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis 1995 update. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1991). Effectieve instructie: Een empirische bijdrage aan de verbetering van het onderwijs in de klas [Effective instruction: An empirical contribution to improvement of education in the class]. Instituut voor Onderzoek van het Onderwijs (SVO).
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600697242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, H. J. (1959). Accuracy in statistical sampling. The Accounting Review, 34(3), 356–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deinum, J. F., Uffen, I., & van de Grift, W. (2018). Het oog van de meester: Lesobservaties om de lespraktijk te verbeteren [The eye of the master: Lesson observations to improve teaching practice]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbelaer, M. J. (2019). The quality and qualities of classroom observation systems [Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente]. Ipskamp printing. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036547161
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. S., & Worthington, L. A. (1994). Research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators (Technical Report No. 5). National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605300301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2012). An integrated model of goal-focused coaching: An evidence-based framework for teaching and practice. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2012.7.2.146
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086306
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, G. G. (1982). Intraclass correlation coefficient. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences: Vol 4. Icing the tails – Limit theorems (pp. 213–217). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1995). Effective schools research. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 525–547). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819009100403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research in action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Maulana, R., André, S., Helms-Lorenz, M., Ko, J., Chun, S., Shahzad, A., Irnidayanti, Y., Lee, O., de Jager, T., Coetzee, T., & Fadhilah, N. (2021). Observed teaching behaviour in secondary education across six countries: Measurement invariance and indication of cross-national variations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 64–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1777170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (2010). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1086/461325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1985). School reform: The district policy implications of the effective schools literature. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/461410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (1989). Wat maakt scholen effectief? Samenvattingen en analyses van onderzoeksresultaten [What explains a school’s effectivity? Summaries and analyses of research outcomes]. Instituut voor Onderzoek van het Onderwijs (SVO).
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2008). Een overzichtsstudie naar school- en instructie-effectiviteit: Samenvattingen en analyses van onderzoeksresultaten [Review of school and instruction effectiveness: Summaries and analyses of research outcomes]. Universiteit Twente, Vakgroep Onderwijsorganisatie en -management.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, N., van de Grift, W., de Bot, K., & Jansen, E. (2017). A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System, 65, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, T., Houtveen, T., & van de Grift, W. (2019). Effects of data feedback in the teacher training community. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2019-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, T., Houtveen, T., van de Grift, W., & Willemsen, M. (2018). Learning to teach: Effects of classroom observation, assignment of appropriate lesson preparation templates and stage focused feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/15341
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. (1985). Onderwijsleerklimaat en leerlingprestaties [Educational climate and student achievement]. Pedagogische Studiën, 62(4), 401–414.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. (1990). Educational leadership and academic achievement in elementary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345900010104
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (1994). Technisch rapport van het onderzoek onder 386 basisscholen ten behoeve van de evaluatie van het basisonderwijs [Report on the evaluation of 386 schools for elementary education]. Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M (2013). Van zwak naar sterk, de aanpak van zwakke en zeer zwakke scholen voor voortgezet onderwijs in het noorden van het land door observatie van en feedback door leraren [From weak to strong, tackling weak and very weak secondary schools in the north of the country through observation and feedback from teachers]. University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2014). Measuring teaching quality in several European countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.794845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. (2021a). Het coachen van leraren (1). Het vaststellen van de zone van naaste ontwikkeling [Coaching teachers (1). Establishing the zone of proximal development]. Basisschoolmanagement, 35(22), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. (2021b). Het coachen van leraren (2). Welke aanpak werkt om vaardigheden te verbeteren? [Coaching teachers (2). What approach works to improve skills?]. Basisschoolmanagement, 35(2), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W., Chun, S., & Lee, O. (2023). Measuring teaching quality and student engagement in elementary education in South Korea and the Netherlands. Journal of Educational & Psychological Research, 5(3), 767–772.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M., Chun, S., Maulana, R., Lee, O., & Helms-Lorenz, M. (2017). Measuring teaching quality and student engagement in South Korea and The Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1263215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2014). Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006). Underperformance in primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600697317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & Lam, J. F. (1998). Het didactisch handelen in het basisonderwijs [Teaching in elementary education]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 23(3), 224–241.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W., van der Wal, M., & Torenbeek, M. (2011). Ontwikkeling in de pedagogisch didactische vaardigheid van leraren in het basisonderwijs [Development of teaching skills in elementary education]. Pedagogische Studiën, 88(6), 416–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hurk, H. T. G., Houtveen, A. A. M., & van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2016). Fostering effective teaching behaviour through the use of data-feedback. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & van Veen, K. (2015). Developing a teacher evaluation instrument to provide formative feedback using student ratings of teaching acts. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(3), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W. J. C. M., van Veen, K., & Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. (2016). Once is not enough: Establishing reliability criteria for feedback and evaluation decisions based on classroom observations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J., & Haertel, G. D. (1992). Educational psychology’s first century. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007999204543
   Google Scholar