How does leadership affect teacher collaboration? Evidence from teachers in US schools

References

• Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework (OECD Education Working Paper No. 187). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2022). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: Mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 48(5), 602–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, B., Johnson, D., & Montgomery, D. (2005). The power of teacher leadership. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 56–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., Nilsen, T., & Scherer, R. (2021). School innovativeness is associated with enhanced teacher collaboration, innovative classroom practices, and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1645–1667. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Teaching around the world: What can TALIS tell us. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Buske, R. (2018). The principal as a key actor in promoting teachers’ innovativeness – Analyzing the innovativeness of teaching staff with variance-based partial least square modeling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1427606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caena, F. (2011). Literature review: Quality in teachers’ continuing professional development. European Commission. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344906256_Literature_review_Quality_in_Teachers'_continuing_professional_development
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., & Kang, W, (2019). Sustainability of cooperative professional development: Focused on teachers’ efficacy. Sustainability, 11(3), Article 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers’ professional development: A solitary or collegial (ad)venture? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00051-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çoban, Ö., & Atasoy, R. (2020). Relationship between distributed leadership, teacher collaboration and organizational innovativeness. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20679
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1993). Educational leadership for teacher collaboration. In B. S. Billingsley, D. Peterson, D. Bodkins, & M. B. Hendricks (Eds.), Program leadership for serving students with disabilities (pp. 421–444). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED372532.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202–218). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos, G., Hulpia, H., Tuytens, M., & Sinnaeve, I. (2013). Self-other agreement as an alternative perspective of school leadership analysis: An exploratory study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.693103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665938
   Google Scholar
• Doğan, S., & Yurtseven, N. (2018). Professional learning as a predictor for instructional quality: A secondary analysis of TALIS. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1383274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohoo, J. (2013). Collaborative inquiry for educators: A facilitator’s guide to school improvement. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., & Hamby, D. W. (2015). Metasynthesis of in-service professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(12), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2306
   Google Scholar
• Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Sukru Bellibas, M. (2013). Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration. The International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2012-0107
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Evertson, D. W. (2020). The influence of principal leadership on teacher collaboration: Does effective professional development mediate this effect? [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. Educational Administration: Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/315
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2011). Change leader: Learning to do what matters most. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, W. N., & Flessa, J. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 518–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06290641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumus, S., Bulut, O., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis. Education Research and Perspectives, 40(2013), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. Jossey–Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9048-4
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010). Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Vlerick, P. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers’ organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1745–1784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00917.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903231201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., Sirinides, P., & Dougherty, P. (2018). Leadership matters: Teachers’ roles in school decision making and school performance. American Educator, 42(1), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, W. R., & Tsai, T. (2018). The prevalence of collaboration among American teachers: National findings from the American teacher panel. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2200/RR2217/RAND_RR2217.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, E., Egert, F., Gronostaj, A., & Vock, M. (2020). Professional development on fostering students’ academic language proficiency across the curriculum – A meta-analysis of its impact on teachers’ cognition and teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, Article 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellough, R. D., & Kellough, N. G. (2008). Teaching young adolescents: Methods and resources for middle grades teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., & Lee, Y. (2020). Principal instructional leadership for teacher participation in professional development: Evidence from Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09616-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://citejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/v9i1general1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kolleck, N. (2019). Motivational aspects of teacher collaboration. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00122
   Google Scholar
• Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbrey, S. M., & Feurig, P. L. (2005). Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Human Research Development Quarterly, 16(2), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1133
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). New perspectives on an old idea: A short history of the old idea. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2013). Social network and social capital in leadership and management research: A review of causal methods. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 638–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. H. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108317020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2017). Leading teacher learning in China: A mixed methods study of successful school leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Sun, & K. Pollock (Eds.), Studies in educational leadership: Vol. 23. How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework (pp. 279–303). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8_13
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Bellibas, M. S., & Printy, S. (2018). How school context and educator characteristics predict distributed leadership: A hierarchical structural equation model with 2013 TALIS data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216665839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement – A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.550467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., Louis, K. S., & Printy, S. M. (2000). The capacity for organizational learning: Implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 239–266). Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863271
   Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10378689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, C. A., & Hutinger, J. L. (2008). The principal’s role in fostering collaborative learning communities through faculty study group development. Theory Into Practice, 47(4), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802329136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2016). What teachers should know and be able to do: The five core propositions. https://www.accomplishedteacher.org/_files/ugd/0ac8c7_25be1413beb24c14ab8f6e78a20aa98f.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2010). This we believe: Keys to educating young adolescents.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, Article 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 157–200). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report. www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, C. (2021). Distributed leadership and innovative teaching practices. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, Article 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100088
   Google Scholar
• Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1086/648981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Plauborg, H. (2009). Opportunities and limitations for learning within teachers’ collaboration in teams: Perspectives from action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330902731293
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons, A., & Houldsworth, L. (2020). Insights and interpretations. In Global Teaching InSights: A video study of teaching (pp. 287–302). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d0f4a644-en
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Qian, H., Walker, A., & Yang, X. (2017). Building and leading a learning culture among teachers: A case study of a Shanghai primary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215623785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, T. C. (2015). Professional learning communities and the diffusion of pedagogical innovation in the Chinese education system. Comparative Education Review, 59(1), 102–132. https://doi.org/10.1086/678358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirrell, M., Hopkins, M., & Spillane, J. P. (2019). Educational infrastructure, professional learning, and changes in teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, D., Piderit, S., Burnetas, A., & Leenawong, C. (2005). Mathematical models for studying the value of motivational leadership in teams. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 11(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-005-1752-0
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Szczesiul, S., & Huizenga, J. (2014). The burden of leadership: Exploring the principal’s role in teacher collaboration. Improving Schools, 17(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214534545
   Google Scholar
• Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. S. (2009). Distributing leadership to improve outcomes for students. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 197–222). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/15341
   Google Scholar
• Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in U.S. schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth-Pjeczka, K., Rapos, N., & Szivák, J. (2019). Components, models and operational mechanisms of teacher collaboration. In M. Kowalczuk-Walêdziak, A. Korzeniecka-Bondar, W. Danilewicz, & G. Lauwers (Eds.), Rethinking teacher education for the 21st century: Trends, challenges and new directions (pp. 283–299). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpb3xhh.22
   Google Scholar
• van der Vegt, G. S., van de Vliert, E., & Huang, X. (2005). Location-level links between diversity and innovative climate depend on national power distance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet, J., & Steijn, B. (2021). Team innovation through collaboration: How visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1275–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1743344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfenden, F. (2022). Innovation in teacher policy and practice in education recovery. International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar