158
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Idiopathic Vitritis after Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation: Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes in a Multicentric Cohort

, MDORCID Icon, , MD, , MD, , PhD, MPH, , MSORCID Icon, , MD, , MDORCID Icon & , MD show all
Pages 769-775 | Received 10 Jun 2020, Accepted 16 Sep 2020, Published online: 15 Oct 2020

References

  • Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, Yu F. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:640–651.
  • Aldave AJ, Sangwan VS, Basu S, et al. International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1530–1538.
  • Klufas MA, Yannuzzi NA, D’Amico DJ, Kiss S. Vitreoretinal aspects of permanent keratoprosthesis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60:216–228.
  • Nouri M, Terada H, Alfonso EC, et al. Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis: incidence, bacterial causes, and risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:484–489.
  • Modjtahedi BS, Eliott D. Vitreoretinal complications of the Boston Keratoprosthesis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014;29:338–348.
  • Grassi CM, Crnej A, Paschalis EI, et al. Idiopathic vitritis in the setting of Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2015;34:165–170.
  • Nouri M, Durand ML, Dohlman CH. Sudden reversible vitritis after keratoprosthesis: an immune phenomenon? Cornea. 2005;24:915–919.
  • Grassi CM, Cruzat A, Taniguchi EV, et al. Periprosthetic tissue loss in patients with idiopathic vitreous inflammation after the boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2015;34:1378–1382.
  • Johnson D, Robert MC, Bouhout S, Harissi-Dagher M. Vitritis after Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 implantation. Ophthalmol Retina. 2018;2:1050–1055.
  • Robert MC, Moussally K, Harissi-Dagher M. Review of endophthalmitis following Boston keratoprosthesis type 1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:776–780.
  • Kim MJ, Yu F, Aldave AJ. Microbial keratitis after Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation: incidence, organisms, risk factors, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2209–2216.
  • Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M. Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1236–1240.
  • Aravena C, Yu F, Aldave AJ. Long-term visual outcomes, complications, and retention of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2018;37:3–10.
  • Fujishima H, Okada N, Dogru M, et al. The role of Staphylococcal enterotoxin in atopic keratoconjunctivitis and corneal ulceration. Allergy. 2012;67:799–803.
  • Barza M, Pavan PR, Doft BH, et al. Evaluation of microbiological diagnostic techniques in postoperative endophthalmitis in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1142–1150.
  • Rampini SK, Bloemberg GV, Keller PM, et al. Broad-range 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:1245–1251.
  • Lleo MM, Ghidini V, Tafi MC, et al. Detecting the presence of bacterial DNA by PCR can be useful in diagnosing culture-negative cases of infection, especially in patients with suspected infection and antibiotic therapy. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;354:153–160.
  • Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:397–409.
  • Sivaraman KR, Hou JH, Chang JH, et al. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of biofilm formation in explanted human boston type I keratoprostheses. Cornea. 2016;35:25–29.
  • Riau AK, Venkatraman SS, Dohlman CH, Mehta JS. Surface modifications of the PMMA optic of a keratoprosthesis to improve biointegration. Cornea. 2017;36:S15–s25.
  • Pelletier JS, Barone SB, Capriotii JA. Keratoprosthesis prophylaxis: is it time for a paradigm shift? Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1785–1788.
  • Lanker Klossner B, Widmer HR, Frey F. Nondevelopment of resistance by bacteria during hospital use of povidone-iodine. Dermatology. 1997;195:10–13.
  • Jardeleza MS, Rheaume MA, Chodosh J, Lane AM, Dohlman CH. Retinal detachments after Boston keratoprosthesis: incidence, predisposing factors, and visual outcomes. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2015;21:1–15.
  • Kunavisarut P, Srisomboon T, Patikulsila D, et al. Risk factors for development of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in patients with Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27:681–685.
  • Petrou P, Banerjee PJ, Wilkins MR, et al. Characteristics and vitreoretinal management of retinal detachment in eyes with Boston keratoprosthesis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:629–633.
  • Perez VL, Leung EH, Berrocal AM, et al. Impact of total pars plana vitrectomy on postoperative complications in Aphakic, Snap-On, Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1504–1509.
  • Sayegh RR, Dohlman CH. Wide-angle fundus imaging through the Boston keratoprosthesis. Retina. 2013;33:1188–1192.
  • Francone A, Kothari N, Farajzadeh M, et al. Detection of neurosensory retinal detachment complicating degenerative retinoschisis by ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence imaging. Retina. 2020;40:819–824.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.