Effect of SEBS-MA and MAPP as coupling agent on the thermal and mechanical properties in highly filled composites of oil palm fiber/PP

References

• Sanadi AR, Caulfield DF, Jacobson RE, et al. Renewable agricultural fibers as reinforcing fillers in plastics: mechanical properties of kenaf fiber – polypropylene composites. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1995;34:1889–1896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci. 1999;24:221–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnani R, Krishnan M, Narayan R. Biofiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Polym Eng Sci. 1997;37:476–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaraj B. Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene/sugarcane bagasse composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2007;103:3827–3832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Almeida Lucas A, Bonse BC, Ambrósio JD, et al. Natural fiber polymer composites technology applied to the recovery and protection of tropical forests allied to the recycling of industrial and urban residues. London, UK: INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Satyanarayana KG, Guimaraes JL, Wypych F. Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: source, production, morphology, properties and applications. Composites Part A. 2007;38:1694–1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanadi AR, Young RA, Clemons C, et al. Recycled newspaper fibers as reinforcing fillers in thermoplastics: analysis of tensile and impact properties in polypropylene. J Reinf Plast Compos. 1994;13:54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felix JM, Gatenholm P. Formation of entanglements at brushlike interfaces in cellulose-polymer composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 1993;50:699–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamun AA, Heim HP, Beg DH, et al. PLA and PP composites with enzyme modified oil palm fibre: A comparative study. Composites Part A. 2013;53:160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinoj S, Visvanathan R, Panigrahi S, et al. Oil palm fiber (OPF) and its composites: A review. Ind Crops Products. 2011;33:7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson M, Le Baillif M, Oksman K. Extrusion and mechanical properties of highly filled cellulose fibre-polypropylene composites. Composites Part A. 2007;38:1922–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid M, Salmiaton A, Chuah TG, et al. Effect of MAPP and TMPTA as compatibilizer on the mechanical properties of cellulose and oil palm fiber empty fruit bunch-polypropylene biocomposites. Compos Interf. 2008;15:251–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozman HD, Saad MJ, Ishak ZAM. Flexural and impact properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB)-polypropylene composites - the effect of maleic anhydride chemical modification of EFB. Polym Test. 2003;22:335–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons C, Sanadi AR. Instrumented impact testing of kenaf fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: effects of temperature and composition. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2007;26:1587–1602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Wang Q. Effect of maleic anhydride grafted styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene (MA-SEBS) on impact fracture behavior of polypropylene/wood fiber composites. J Forest Res. 2007;18:203–207.
   Google Scholar
• Pracella M, Minhaz-Ul HM, Alvarez V. Functionalization, compatibilization and properties of polyolefin composites with natural fibers. Polym. 2010;2:554–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Maiti SN. Effects of crystallinity of PP and flexibility of SEBS-g-MA copolymer on the mechanical properties of PP/SEBS-g-MA blends. Polym Plast Technol Eng. 2014;53:229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanadi AR, Caulfield D. Thermoplastic polyolefins as formaldehyde free binders in highly filled lignocellulosic panel boards: using glycerine as a processing aid in kenaf fiber polypropylene boards, mater. Res. 2008;11:487–492.
   Google Scholar
• Dufresne A. Cellulose-based composites and nanocomposites. In: Monomers, polymers and composites from renewable resources. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2008. p. 401–418.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Khalil HPS, Jawaid M, Hassan A, et al. Oil palm biomass fibres and recent advancement in oil palm biomass fibres based hybrid biocomposites. In: Hu N, Ed.. Composites and their applications. London, UK: InTech; 2012. p. 187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Products Laboratory. Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 2010. p. 508.
   Google Scholar
• Kusmono M, Ishak ZA, Chow WS, et al. Rochmadi. Influence of SEBS-g-MA on morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of PA6/PP/organoclay nanocomposites. Eur Polym J. 2008;44:1023–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu FOMS, Forte MMC, Liberman SA. SBS and SEBS block copolymers as impact modifiers for polypropylene compounds. J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;95:254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landel RF, Nilsen LF. Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. NewYork, USA: CRC press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen AW. How overdrying wood reduces its bonding to phenol-formaldehyde adhesives: a critical review of the literature. Part I, Physical Responses. Wood Fiber Sci. 1990;22:441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikerman JJ. The science of adhesive joints. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bikerman JJ. Causes of poor adhesion: weak boundary layers. Ind Eng Chem. 1967;59:40–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JS, Yu DM, Chan CM, et al. Effect of fiber pretreatment condition on the interfacial strength and mechanical properties of wood fiber/PP composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000;76:1000–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labronici M, Ishida H. Toughening composites by fiber coating: a review. Compos Interfaces. 1994;2:199–234.
   Google Scholar
• Etaati A, Pather S, Fang Z, et al. The study of fibre/matrix bond strength in short hemp polypropylene composites from dynamic mechanical analysis. Compos Part B. 2014;62:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar