Characterization of interlaminar shear properties of nanostructured unidirectional composites

References

• Buckley JD, Edie DD. Carbon-carbon materials and composites. New Jersey (NJ): Noyes Publications; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mallick PK. Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design. 3rd ed. Michigan (MI): CRC Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzer E, Manocha LM. Carbon reinforcements and carbon/carbon composites. Germany: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry M, Czekanski A, Zhu Z. Characterization of carbon nanotube enhanced interlaminar fracture toughness of woven carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;131–132:480–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njuguna J, Pielichowski K. Polymer nanocomposites for aerospace applications: properties. Adv Eng Mater. 2003;5(11):769–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thostenson E, Li C, Chou T. Nanocomposites in context. Compos Sci Technol. 2005;65(3–4):491–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler B, Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, et al. Fundamental aspects of nano-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66:3115–3125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul DR, Robeson LM. Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer. 2008;49(15):3187–3204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov VN. Carbon nanotubes: properties and application. Mater Sci Eng R. 2004;43(3):61–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou HW, Mishnaevsky L Jr., Yi HY, et al. Carbon fiber/carbon nanotube reinforced hierarchical composites: effect of CNT distribution on shearing strength. Compos Part B Eng. 2016;88:201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrier A, Godara A, Rochez O, et al. The effect of adding carbon nanotubes to glass/epoxy composites in the fibre sizing and/or the matrix. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2010;41(4):532–538. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Pascual AM, Naffakh M, Marco C, et al. Multiscale fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites incorporating carbon nanotubes: a review. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2014;18(2):62–80. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia E, Wardle B, Johnhart A, et al. Fabrication and multifunctional properties of a hybrid laminate with aligned carbon nanotubes grown In Situ. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68(9):2034–2041. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Li K, Si Z, et al. Compressive and interlaminar shear properties of carbon/carbon composite laminates reinforced with carbon nanotube-grafted carbon fibers produced by injection chemical vapor deposition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;626:449–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Greef N, Zhang L, Magrez A, et al. Direct growth of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibers: effect of the CVD parameters on the degradation of mechanical properties of carbon fibers. Diam Relat Mater. 2015;51:39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández B, Arbelaiz A, Valea A, et al. A comparative study on the influence of epoxy sizings on the mechanical performance of woven carbon fiber-epoxy composites. Polym Compos. 2004;25(3):319–330. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren P, Liang G, Zhang Z. Influence of epoxy sizing of carbon-fiber on the properties of carbon fiber/cyanate ester composites. Polym Compos. 2006;27(5):591–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for tensile strength and Young’s modulus of fibers. Pennsylvania: ASTM; 2014. Standard No. C1557-14.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test methods for properties of continuous filament carbon and graphite fiber tows. Pennsylvania: ASTM; 2000. Standard No. D4018-99.
   Google Scholar
• Cota ML, Almeida SF, Rezende MC. The influence of porosity on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon/epoxy and carbon/bismaleimide fabric laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:2101–2108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and laminates. Pennsylvania: ASTM; 2016. Standard No. D2344/D2344M-16.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for mode i interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Pennsylvania: ASTM; 2007. Standard No. D5528-01.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner SA, Li R, Wardle BL. Circumventing the mechanochemical origins of strength loss in the synthesis of hierarchical carbon fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(11):4892–4903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar