Effects of single-phase and co-deposited interphases on mechanical properties of T700TM-C/SiC minicomposites: experiment and theory prediction

References

• Krenkel W, Berndt F. C/C–sic composites for space applications and advanced friction systems. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;412(1–2):177‒181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell T, Ting J, Avitabile P, et al. Dynamic properties of 3-D reinforced C/SiC for the RS-2200 linear aerospike engine. Ceram Eng Sci Proc. 2000;21:517‒524.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Beyer S, Knabe H, et al. Advanced ceramic matrix composite materials for current and future propulsion technology applications. Acta Astro. 2004;55(3–9):409‒420. DOI:10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.052
   Google Scholar
• Li LB. Durability of ceramic matrix composites. Oxford: Elsevier; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Li LB. High temperature mechanical behavior of ceramic-matrix composites. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey B, Matthias K CESIC light-weight SiC composite for optics and structures. Proc. SPIE 5868, Optical Materials and Structures Technologies II, San Diego, California, United States, 586807.
   Google Scholar
• Li LB. Interfaces of ceramic-matrix composites: design, characterization and damage effects. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang LR, Fergus JW, Chen HP, et al. Interphase compatibility in ceramic-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1996;56(12):1341‒1348. DOI:10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00008-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao XY, Yin XW, Fan XM, et al. Effect of PyC interphase thickness on mechanical behaviors of SiBC matrix modified C/SiC composites fabricated by reactive melt infiltration. Carbon. 2014;77:886‒895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei H, Bai QL, Sun YY, et al. The effect of heat treatment on the strength and toughness of carbon fiber/silicon carbide composites with different pyrolytic carbon interphase thicknesses. Carbon. 2013;57:288‒297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao DL, Guo T, Fan XM, et al. Effect of pyrolytic carbon interphase on mechanical properties of mini T800-C/SiC composites. J Adv Ceram. 2021;10(2):219–226. DOI:10.1007/s40145-020-0432-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan HZ, Zhang ZW, Li LB, et al. Effect of pyrocarbon interphase texture and thickness on tensile damage and fracture in T-700™ carbon fiber–reinforced silicon carbide minicomposites. J Am Ceram Soc. 2022;105(3):2171‒2181. DOI:10.1111/jace.18193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Y, Rhee KY. Development of expanded Takayanagi model for tensile modulus of carbon nanotubes reinforced nanocomposites assuming interphase regions surrounding the dispersed and networked nanoparticles. Polymers. 2020;12(1):233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Y, Rhee KY. A simulation work for the influences of aggregation/agglomeration of clay layers on the tensile properties of nanocomposites. Model Simu Compos Mater. 2019;71(11):3989‒3995.
   Google Scholar
• Peng WX, Rhim S, Zare Y, et al. Effect of “Z” factor for strength of interphase layers on the tensile strength of polymer nanocomposites. Polym Compos. 2019;40(3):1117‒1122. DOI:10.1002/pc.24813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Sarafbidabad M, Zare Y, et al. Estimation of the tensile modulus of polymer carbon nanotube nanocomposites containing filler networks and interphase regions by development of the Kolarik model. Royal Soc Chem. 2018;8(42):23825‒23834. DOI:10.1039/C8RA01910J
   Google Scholar
• Wang HR, Chen ZK, Zhang RQ, et al. Preparation and tensile behavior of SiCf/SiC minicomposites containing different types and thicknesses of interphase. Ceram Int. 2020;46(14):2297‒22306. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB, Guo XJ, Liu YF. Characterization of cyclic loading/unloading damage behavior in fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites using inverse tangent modulus. J Euro Ceram Soc. 2022;42(5):1912‒1927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB. A time-dependent tensile constitutive model for long-fiber-reinforced unidirectional ceramic-matrix minicomposites considering interface and fiber oxidation. Int J Damage Mech. 2020;29(7):1138–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB. Synergistic effects of interface slip and fiber fracture on stress-dependent mechanical hysteresis of SiC/SiC minicomposites. Compos Interfaces. 2020;27(10):937–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB. Comparisons of interface shear stress degradation rate between C/SiC and SiC/SiC ceramic-matrix composites under cyclic fatigue loading at room and elevated temperatures. Compos Interfaces. 2017;24(2):171–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB. Effects of temperature, oxidation and fiber preforms on interface shear stress degradation in fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;674:588‒603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg RK, Almansour AS, Sullivan RM. Analytical simulation of effects of local mechanisms on tensile response of ceramic matrix minicomposites. J Euro Ceram Soc. 2022;42(15):6846–6864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Molina-Aldareguia JM, Gonzalez C, et al. A methodology to measure the interphase shear strength by means of the fiber push-in test. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72(15):1924‒1932. DOI:10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharrat M, Chateauminois A, Carpentier L, et al. On the interfacial behavior of a glass/epoxy composite during a micro-indentation test: assessment of interfacial shear strength using reduced indentation curves. Compos Part A. 1997;28(1):39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerans RJ, Parthasarathy TA. Theoretical analysis of the fiber pullout and pushout tests. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74(7):1585–1596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackin TJ, Yang J, Warren PD. Influence of fiber roughness on the sliding behavior of sapphire fibers in TiAl and glass matrices. J Am Ceram Soc. 1992;75(12):3358–3362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechel VT, Sottos NR. Application of debond length measurements to examine the mechanics of fiber pushout. J Mech Phys Solids. 1998;46(9):1675–1697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra N, Ghonem H. Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments. Compos A. 2001;32(3–4):575–584.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer D, Abad MD, Krumwiede D, et al. Localized mechanical property assessment of SiC/SiC composite materials. Compos Part A. 2015;70:93‒101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebillat F, Lamon J, Guette A. The Concept of a strong interphase applied to SiC/SiC composites with a BN interphase. Acta Mater. 2000;48(18–19):4609‒4618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand S, Forio P, Pailler R, et al. Hi-Nicalon/SiC minicomposites with (pyrocarbon/SiC)n nanoscale multilayered interphases. J Am Ceram Soc. 1999;82(9):2465–2473. DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morscher GN, Martinez-Fernandez J. Fiber effects on minicomposite mechanical properties for several silicon carbide fiber-chemically vapor-infiltrated silicon carbide matrix systems. J Am Ceram Soc. 1999;82(1):145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HT, Yang LW, Sun X, et al. Enhancing the fracture resistance of carbon fiber reinforced SiC matrix composites by interphase modification through a simple fiber heat-treatment process. Carbon. 2016;109:435‒443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZW, Liu YF, Li LB, et al. Modeling tensile damage and fracture behavior of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix minicomposites. Materials. 2020;13(19):4313. DOI:10.3390/ma13194313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZW, Li LB, Chen ZK. Damage evolution and fracture behavior of C/SiC minicomposites with different interphases under uniaxial tensile load. Materials. 2020;14(6):1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB. Micromechanical modeling for tensile behaviour of carbon fiber − reinforced ceramic − matrix composites. Appl Compos Mater. 2015;22(6):773‒790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LB, Song YD, Sun YC. Modeling the tensile behavior of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic-matrix composites. Mech Compos Mater. 2014;49(6):659‒672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fok SL, Mitchell BC, Smart J, et al. A numerical study on the application of the Weibull theory to brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech. 2001;68(10):1171‒79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi Z, Chou TW, Shen G. Determination of single fibre strength distribution from fibre bundle testings. J Mater Sci. 1984;19(10):3319‒3324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassios KG, Steen M, Filou C. Mechanical properties of alumina Nextel™ 720 fibres at room and elevated temperatures: tensile bundle testing. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;349(1–2):63‒72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LD, Vandeperre LJ, Haynes TA, et al. Theory and application of Weibull distributions to 1D peridynamics for brittle solids. Computer Meth Appl Mech Eng. 2020;363:112903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Murthy DNP. A study of Weibull shape parameter: properties and significance. Reliab Eng Sys Safe. 2011;96(12):1619‒1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar