27
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Traveling Vision Examiner Program in the Submacular Surgery Trials Pilot Study

, MPH, COMT, , MS, , PhD, , MS, COMT, , MD, , MPH, COMT, , MS, , PhD, , MS, COMT & , MD show all
Pages 47-57 | Accepted 25 Aug 2004, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Dong L M, Marsh M J, Hawkins B S. Measurement and analysis of visual acuity in multicenter randomized clinical trials in the United States: findings from a survey. Ophthalm Epidemiol. 2003; 10: 149–165, [CSA]
  • Submacular Surgery Trials Study Group. Submacular Surgery Trials Manual of Procedures. Chapter 2: Study Design Synopsis. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA June, 1998, Accession No. PB87-221834
  • Submacular Surgery Trials Pilot Study Investigators. Submacular Surgery Trials randomized pilot trial of laser photocoagulation versus surgery for recurrent choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: I. Ophthalmic outcomesSubmacular Surgery Trials Pilot Study Report Number 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 130: 387–407, [CROSSREF], [CSA]
  • Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Manual of Operations. DRS Coordinating Center and Reading Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Division of Clinical Investigation, Baltimore, MD July, 1978
  • TAP Study Group. Treatment of AMD with PDT (TAP) Manual of Procedures. Appendix 6: Visual Acuity Protocol. QLT Inc. and Bulach, Vancouver, BC May, 1997, Switzerland: Novartis Ophthalmics AG
  • VIP Study Group. Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP). Appendix 6: Visual Acuity Protocol. QLT Inc. and Bulach, Vancouver, BC December, 1997, Switzerland: Ciba Vision Ophthalmics AG
  • Optican D C, Hawkins B S, Regan V. Turnover among clinical coordinators in two multicenter clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 257, [CROSSREF]
  • McCaffrey L, Keller JA. A cost-benefit analysis: Certification of multiple visual acuity examiners per center in multicenter clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1991; 12: 712
  • Mobley R Y, Moy C S, Reynolds S. Time trends in personnel certification and turnover in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. Clin Trials 2004; 1: 377–386, [CROSSREF]
  • Dobson V, Quinn G E, Biglan A W. Acuity card assessment of visual function in the cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Trial. IOVS 1990; 31: 1702–1708
  • Submacular Surgery Trials Study Group. Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) Manual of Procedures. Chapter 10: Procedures Followed by Traveling Vision Examiners. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA June, 1998, Accession No. PB87-221834
  • Submacular Surgery Trials Study Group. Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) Manual of Procedures. Chapter 7: Procedures for Refraction and Vision testing. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA June, 1998, Accession No. PB87-221834
  • Dong L M, Hawkins B S, Marsh M J. Consistency between visual acuity scores obtained at different test distances. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 1523–1533, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Ferris F L, Kassoff A, Bresnick G H, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; 94: 91–96, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
  • Bailey I L, Lovie J E. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Optom Physiol Optics. 1976; 53: 740–745
  • Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration. Results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109: 1220–1231
  • Pelli G S, Robson J G, Wilkins J A. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988; 2(3)187–199
  • Rubin G S. Reliability and sensitivity of clinical contrast sensitivity test. Clin Vis Sci. 1988; 2(3)169–177
  • Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476)307–310, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
  • Rosenfeld M, Chiu N N. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci. 1995; 72: 577–579, [CSA]
  • Goss D A, Grosvenor T. Reliability of refraction. A literature review. J Am Optom Assoc 1996; 67: 619–630, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Orr P R, Cramer L, Hawkins B S, Bressler N B. Manifest refraction versus autorefraction for patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(2)447–452, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Hawkins B S. Reliability of visual acuity measurements and screening under field conditions. Ophthalm Epidemiol. 1995; 42(2)99–106
  • Klein R, Klein B EK, Linton K LP, De Mets D L. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: Visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98: 1310–1315, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
  • Blackhurst D W, Maguire M G, The Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Reproducibility of refraction and visual acuity measurement under a standard protocol. Retina. 1989; 9: 163–169, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.