The Refractive Status and Vision Profile (RSVP): Translation Into Persian, Reliability and Validity

REFERENCES

• Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. The age- and gender-specific prevalences of refractive errors in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004; 11(3)213–225, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichte C M, Bell A M. Ongoing results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: subjective patient impressions. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994; 20(Suppl)268–270, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• McGhee C N, Orr D, Kidd B, et al. Psychological aspects of excimer laser surgery for myopia: reasons for seeking treatment and patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80(10)874–879, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas C, Oliveiros B M, Marques E, et al. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on visual functioning and quality of life. J Refract Surg 1995; 11(3 Suppl)S327–334, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Sira A, Loewenstein A, Lipshitz I, et al. Patient satisfaction after 5.0-mm photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 1997; 13(2)129–134, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Rushood A A, Nassim H M, Azeemuddin T. Patient satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia using the visual analogue scale. J Refract Surg 1997; 13(5 Suppl)S438–440, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• McGhee C N, Craig J P, Sachdev N, et al. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26(4)497–509, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Frost N A, Sparrow J M, Durant J S, et al. Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998; 5(4)185–210, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hays R D, Mangione C M, Ellwein L, et al. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(12)2292–2301, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell P J, Mangione C, Lee P, et al. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(12)2302–2309, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Rose K, Harper R, Tromans C, et al. Quality of life in myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84(9)1031–1034, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Vitale S, Schein O D, Meinert C L, et al. The refractive status and vision profile: a questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(8)1529–1539, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Schein O D, Vitale S, Cassard S D, et al. Patient outcomes of refractive surgery. The refractive status and vision profile. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27(5)665–673, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin J F, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 1: development and validation of a survey questionnaire. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(9)1783–1789, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin J F, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(9)1790–1796, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Hilton A, Skrutkowski M. Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25(1)1–7, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D E, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24)3186–3191, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonomi A E, Cella D F, Hahn E A, et al. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual Life Res 1996; 5(3)309–320, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11)913–923, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J L. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1999; 10–12
   Google Scholar
• Montazeri A, Harirchi I, Vahdani M, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Support Care Cancer 1999; 7(6)400–406, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Ebrahimi M, et al. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1)14, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montazeri A, Harirchi A M, Shariati M, et al. The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1)66, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aghaei S, Sodaifi M, Jafari P, et al. DLQI scores in vitiligo: reliability and validity of the Persian version. BMC Dermatol 2004; 4: 8, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8(2)94–104, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols J J, Mitchell G L, Saracino M, et al. Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121(9)1289–1296, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar