Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT 2) Parameters in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Comparative Study in an Indian Population

REFERENCES

• Quigley H A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 389–393, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thylefors B, Negrel A D, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull WHO 1995; 73: 115–121, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Jacob A, Muliyil J P, et al. Prevalence of primary glaucomas in an urban South Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998; 46: 81–86, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1710–1716, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley H A, Dunkelberger G R, Baginski T A, et al. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of larger optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 357–363, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley H A, Dunkelberger G R, Green W R. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 453–464, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumanee A E. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss: I. Methods and changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 1444–1448, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Read R M, Spaeth G L. The practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of cup progression and some disc-field correlation. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1974; 78: 255–274, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Oldelberg T, Riise D. Early diagnosis of glaucoma. The value of successive stereophotography of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1985; 63: 257–263, [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley H A, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 77–83, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J B, Grundler A E. Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disc variables in the open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 124: 488–497, [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1414–1424, [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaeth G L. The Optic Nerve in Glaucoma, R Varma, G Spaeth, K W Parker. JP Lippincott Co., Philadelphia 1993; 63–82
   Google Scholar
• Fechtner R D, Ikram F, Essock E A. Advances in quantitative optic nerve analysis. Advances in clinical ophthalmology, R M Burde, T L Slamovits. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis 1996; Vol. 3: 203–224
   Google Scholar
• Zangwill L M, Williams J M, Weinreb R N. Quantitative methods for evaluating the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clinics N Am 1998; 11: 233–241, [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II Operation Manual Software. Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg 2000, Version 1.5.0
   Google Scholar
• Zangwill L M, Berry C C, Weinreb R N. Optic disc topographic measurements after pupil dilation. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1751–1755, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zangwill L M, Irak I, Berry C C, et al. Effect of cataract and pupil size on image quality with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 983–990, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollstein G, Garway-Heath D F, Hitchings R A. Identification of mild glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557–1563, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikelberg F S, Parfitt C M, Swindale N V, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect mild glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995; 4: 242–247, [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 2393–2401, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry C C, et al. Detection of mild glaucomatous structural damage with confocal laser scanning tomography. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 121–127, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iester M, Swindale N V, Mikelberg F S. Sector-based analysis of optic nerve head shape parameters and visual field indices in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 1997; 6: 371–376, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Mistlberger A, Liebmann J M, Greenfield D S, et al. Heidelberg Retina Tomography and optical coherence tomography in normal, ocular-hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2027–2032, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Correlation of visual field with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1191–1194, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teesalu P, Vihanninjoki K, Airaksinen P J, et al. Correlation of Blue on Yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 2452–2459, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi N, Anton A, Sample P A, et al. Mapping structural damage to the optic disc to visual field defects in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123: 667–676, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida H, Yamamoto T, Tomita G, et al. Peripapillary atrophy in the primary angle closure glaucoma: A comparative study with primary open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127: 121–128, [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhee R, Kim Y Y, Nam D H, et al. Comparison of visual field defects between primary open angle glaucoma and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma in the mild or moderate stage of the disease. Korean J Ophthalmol 2001; 15: 27–31, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Airaksinen P J, Burk R O, Vihanninjoki K, . Neuroretinal rim volume with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Glaucoma Update, G K Krieglstein, et al. Kaden Verlag, Cologne 1995; Vol. V: 91–93
   Google Scholar
• Anderson D R. Automated Static Perimetry. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis 1992; 152
   Google Scholar
• Anderson D R. Automated Static Perimetry. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis 1992; 103–105
   Google Scholar
• Hodapp E, Parrish R K, II, Anderson D R. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. Mosby & Co., St. Louis 1993; 63–92
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Thomas S, Chandrashekar G. Gonioscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998; 46: 255–261, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao P S, Richard J. An introduction to biostatistics, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 1999; 71–197
   Google Scholar
• Schulzer M, Drance S M, Carter C J, et al. Biostatistical evidence for two distinct chronic open-angle glaucoma populations. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 196–200, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayreh S S, Walker W M. Fluorescent fundus photography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 63: 982–989, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raitta C, Sarmela T. Fluorescein angiography of the optic disc and peripapillary area in chronic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1970; 48: 303–308, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• O'Brart D P, Lima M S, Bartsch D U, et al. Indocyanine green angiography of the peripapillary region in glaucomatous eyes by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123: 657–666, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantes F E, Anderson D R. Clinical histologic correlation of human peripapillary anatomy. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 20–25, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. Br Med J 1995; 310: 170, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar