Vision Rehabilitation: Recipients' Perceived Efficacy of Rehabilitation

REFERENCES

• Massof R. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. I. Basic Concepts. Optom Vis Sci. 1995; 72: 725–736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberlink M. Keeping an eye on vision: New tools to preserve sight and quality of life. Geriatrics 1997; 52: 0016–867X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massof R. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. II. Measurement of vision disabilities. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 76: 349–373
   Google Scholar
• Stelmack J, Stelmack T, Massof R. Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43: 2859–2868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell W, Harper R, Reeves B, Waterman H, Henson D, McLeod D. Randomised controlled trial of an integrated versus an optometric low vision rehabilitation service for patients with are-related macular degeneration: study design and methodology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001; 21(1)36–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raasch T, Leat S, Kleinstein R, Bullimore M, Cutter G. Evaluating the value of low-vision services. J Am Optom Assoc. 1997; 68: 287–295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massof R W, Rubin G S. Visual function assessment questionnaires. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 45: 531–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmack J. Quality of life of low-vision patients and outcomes of low-vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci. 2001; 78: 335–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer M, Moll A, de Vet H, Terwee C, Volker-Dieben H, van Rens G. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004; 24: 257–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haymes S, Johnston A, Heyes A. Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002; 22: 79–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C. Measuring Health and Medical Outcomes. UCL Press, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Harper R, Doorduyn K, Reeves B, Slater L. Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999; 19: 3–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javitt C, Ware J. Cataract Form 1.1: TyPE Specification. InterStudy, Minneapolis, MN 1990
   Google Scholar
• Legro M. Quality of life and cataracts: A review of patient centered studies of cataract surgery outcomes. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991; 22: 431–443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangione C, Phillips R, Seddon J. Development of ‘activities of Daily Vision Scale’. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care 1992; 30: 1111–1126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg E, Tielsch J, Schein O. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112: 630–638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost N A, Sparrow J M, Durant J S, Donovan J L, Peters T J, Brookes S T. Development of a questionnaire for the measurement of vision-related quality of life. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998; 5: 185–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott I, Smiddy W, Schiffman J, Feuer W, Pappas C. Quality of life of patients with low vision and the impact of low-vision services. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 128: 54–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmack J, Szlyk J, Joslin C, Swetland B, Myers L. Pilot study: use of the NEI VFQ-25 to measure outcomes of low vision rehabilitation services in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes, C Stuen, A Arditi, A Horowitz, et al. Swets & Zeitlinger, LisseThe Netherlands 2000; 774–776
   Google Scholar
• Odom J. Vision, visual needs, and quality of life of older persons in rural environments: a report and synthesis of a meeting. J Rural Aging 2001; 17: 360–363
   Google Scholar
• Ellwein L, Fletcher A, Negrel A, Thulasiraj R. Quality of life assessment in blindness prevention interventions. Int Ophthalmol. 1995; 18: 263–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson N. Quality of life: What is it? How should it be measured?. Oncology (Huntingt) 1988; 2: 69–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olshansky S, Carnes B, Casel C. The ageing of the human species. Scientific American 1993; 268: 46–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard G S. Response-shift bias a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Eval Rev. 1980; 4: 93–106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard G S, Millham J, Slaten S, O'Donnell L. Influence of subject response-style effects on retrospective measures. Appl Psychol Meas. 1981; 5: 144–150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard G S, Ralph K M, Gulanick N A, Maxwell S E, Nance S W, Gerber S K. Internal invalidity in pre-test-post-test self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pre-tests. Appl Psychol Meas. 1979; 3: 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Del'Aune W, Welsh R, Williams M. A national outcomes assessment of the rehabilitation of adults with visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2002; 94: 281–291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram M, Staten L, Cohen S J, Stewart R, de Zapien J G. The use of the retrospective pre-test method to measure skill acquisition among community health workers. Internet Journal of Public Health Education 2004; B6–1-15, http://www.aspher.org/D_services/I-JPHE/journal/article.php3?id_article=9Available at
   Google Scholar
• Pratt C C, McGuigan W M, Katzev A R. Measuring program outcomes: using retrospective pretest methodology. Am J Eval. 2000; 21: 341–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill L G, Betz D L. Revisiting the retrospective pretest. Am J Eval. 2005; 26: 501–517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam T C, Bengo P. A comparison of three retrospective self-reporting methods of measuring change in instructional practice. Am J Eval. 2003; 24: 65–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberger M, Rugh J, Church M, Fort L. Shoestring evaluation: designing impact evaluations under budget, time and data constraints. Am J Eval. 2004; 25: 5–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter C, Althouse R, Humble H, Odom J. West Virginia survey of visual health: Low vision and barriers to access. Vis Impair Res. 2004; 5: 53–71
   Google Scholar
• NEI VFQ-25, Interviewer Administered Format. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Wan C K. LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual. A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Watson G. Low Vision in the Geriatric Population: Rehabilitation and Management. JAGS 2001; 49: 317–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat S, Fryer A, Rumney N. Outcome of low vision aid provision: the effectiveness of a low vision clinic. Optom Vis Sci. 1994; 71: 199–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumney N. Using visual thresholds to establish low vision performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995; 15: 18–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher D, Schuchard R, Watson G. Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effects on low vision reading. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999; 36: 356–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margrain T. Helping blind and partially sigted people to read: the effectiveness of low vision aids. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84: 919–921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlyk J, Seiple W, Laderman D, Delsch R, Stelmack J, McMahon T. Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss”. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 101–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crews J, Whittington F. Vision Loss in an Aging Society: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. AFB Press American Foundation for the Blind, New York 2000; 133–153
   Google Scholar
• Heine C, Browning C. Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions. Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24: 763–773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr A. Vision and Aging: Crossroads for Service Delivery. AFB Press American Foundation for the Blind, New York 1992; 69–92
   Google Scholar
• Hinds A, Sinclair J, Park A, Suttie A, Paterson H, Macdonald M. Impact of an interdisciplinary low vision service on the quality of life of low vision patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87: 1391–1396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow G, Reynolds R. Therapeutic Recreation; A Helping Profession, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1989
   Google Scholar