REFERENCES
- Thylefors B, Negrel A D, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie K Y. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ 1995; 73: 115–121
- Grant W M, Burke J F, Jr. Why do some people go blind from glaucoma?. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 991–998
- Unzueta M, Globe D, Wu J, Paz S, Azen S, Varma R. Compliance with recommendations for follow-up care in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ethn Dis 2004; 14: 285–291
- Quigley H A, Park C K, Tracey P A, Pollack I P. Community screening for eye disease by laypersons: the Hoffberger program. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 386–392
- Anderson A, Johnson C. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, P A Sample, C Girkin. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 2003; 213–225
- Quigley H A. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 819–829
- Trible J R, Schultz R O, Robinson J C, Rothe T L. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 740–745
- Khong J J, Dimitrov P N, Rait J, McCarty C A. Can the specificity of the FDT for glaucoma be improved by confirming abnormal results?. J Glaucoma 2001; 10: 199–202
- Patel S C, Friedman D S, Varadkar P, Robin A L. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry [In Process Citation]. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 323–327
- Burnstein Y, Ellish N J, Magbalon M, Higginbotham E J. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice [In Process Citation]. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 328–333
- Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, et al. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 529–537
- Vision Problems in the U.S.: Prevent Blindness America. 2002; 9
- Hosmer D W, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York 2000
- Claridge O, Ford R P, Schluter P J, Wild C J, Macleod L. The length of the referral chain after failing preschool tympanometry. N Z Med J 1995; 108: 479–481
- Tan H H, Tan H K, Lim H S, Tan A S, Lim S C. Gestational diabetes mellitus: a call for systematic tracing. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002; 31: 281–284
- Kosoko O, Quigley H A, Vitale S, Enger C, Kerrigan L, Tielsch J M. Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2105–2111
- Nirmalan P K, Katz J, Robin A L, et al. Utilisation of eye care services in rural south India: the Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 1237–1241
- Wang Y, Xu L, Jonas J B. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss as determined by frequency doubling perimetry in urban and rural adult chinese. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 1078–1086 e1
- Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Q 2005; 69: 87–98
- Duncan P, Reker D, Kwon S, et al. Measuring stroke impact with the stroke impact scale: telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Med Care 2005; 43: 507–515
- Keeter S, Miller C, Kohut A, Groves R, Presser S. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Q 2000; 64: 125–148