REFERENCES
- Strategies for the Prevention of Blindness in National Programmes. A Primary Health Care Approach. Second edition. WHO, Geneva 1997
- Landers J A, Goldberg I, Graham S L. Comparison of clinical optic disc assessment with tests of early visual field loss. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002; 30: 338–42
- Landers J, Goldberg I, Graham S. A comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry with frequency doubling perimetry for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000; 28: 248–52
- Johnson C A, Samuels J S. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency- doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci February, 1997; 38: 413–25
- Quigley H A. Identification of Glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the Screening Protocol of Frequency Doubling Technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 819–29
- Patel S C, Friedman D S, Varadkar P, et al. Algorithm for interpreting the results of the frequency doubling perimeter. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129(3)323–7
- Thomas R, Bhat S, Muliyil J P, et al. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002; 11(1)46–50
- Chauhan C B, Johnson C A. Test -Retest Variability of Frequency Doubling Perimetry and Conventional Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 648–56
- Lester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, et al. Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 160–64
- Artes P H, Nicolela M T, McCormick T A, Le Blanc R P, et al. Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 646–52
- Joson P J, Kamantigue M EG, Chen P P. Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 757–760
- Brush M B, Chen P P. Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma 2004; 13: 273–7
- Anderson D R, Patella V M. Automated Perimetry, 2nd Edition. Mosby & Co., St. Louis, MO 1999; 152–53
- Hodapp E, Parrish R K, II, Anderson D R. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. Mosby & Co., St. Louis, MO 1993; 1–216
- Chylack L T, Jr, Wolfe J K, Singer D M, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111(6)831–6
- Bland M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986; 307–11
- Lewis R A, Johnson C A, Keltner J L, et al. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observes. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 878–81
- Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1544–49