REFERENCES
- Margolis M K, Coyne K, Kennedy-Martin T, et al. Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning: A literature review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002; 20(12)791–812
- Lester M, Zingirian M. Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma. Eye. 2002; 16(1)44–49
- Owsley C, McGwin G, Jr. Depression and the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(12)2259–264
- Guralnik J M, Branch L G, et al. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol. 1989; 44(5)M141–M146
- Friedman S M, Munoz B, Rubin G S, et al. Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40(5)858–864
- Parrish R K, Gedde S J, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115(11)1447–1455
- Guralnik J M, Simonsick E M, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994; 49(2)M85–M94
- Reuben D B, Siu A L. An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. The Physical Performance Test. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990; 38(10)1105–1112
- West S K, Rubin G S, et al. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120(6)774–780
- Szlyk J P, Seiple W, et al. Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: Relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(1)65–75
- Turco P D, Connolly J, et al. Assessment of functional vision performance: A new test for low vision patients. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004; 1(1)15–25
- Haymes S A, Johnston A W, et al. Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002; 22(2)79–91
- Altangerel U, Spaeth G L, Steinmann W C. Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006; 13(1)67–80
- Linacre. Sample Size and Item Calibration Stability. Rasch Measure Trans 1994; 7(4)328
- Hodapp E, Parrish I IR, Anderson D. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis 1993
- Bailey I L, Bullimore M A, et al. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991; 32(2)422–432
- Pelli D G, Robson J G, Wilkins A J. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. ClinVis Sci. 1998; 2(3)187–199
- Spaeth G L, Henderer J, Liu C, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: Reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 100: 181–185, discussion 5–6
- Mangione C M, Lee P P, Gutierrez P R, et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119(7)1050–1058
- Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A G, et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth. 2007; 39: 175–191
- Green K, Frantom E, et al. Survey development and validation with the Rasch model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation and Testing, Charleston, SC, November, 14–172002
- Feinstein A R, Josephy B R, et al. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 105(3)413–420
- Lennie P, Van Hemel S B. Visual Impairments: Benefits. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 2002
- West S K, Munoz B, et al. Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38(1)72–82