References
- Sommer A. Glaucoma screening: too little, too late? Gen Intern Med. 1990; 5(Suppl.): S33–S37.
- Wilson MR, Khanna S. The value of different screening techniques for glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1994; 5(II): 69–75.
- Shields MB. The challenge of screening for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 120:793–5.
- Leske MC. The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol. 1983; 118:166–91.
- Wilson RM, Hertzmark E, Walker AM, et al. A case-control study of risk factors in open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 5105:1066–71.
- Katz J, Sommer A. Risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma. Am J Prev Med. 1988; 4:110–4.
- Gottleib LK, Schwartz B, Pauker SG. Glaucoma screening, a cost-effectiveness analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983; 28:206–26.
- Eddy DM, Sanders LE, Eddy JF. The value of screening for glaucoma with tonometry. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983; 28:194–205.
- Sponsel ME. Tonometry in question: can visual screening tests play a more decisive role in glaucoma diagnosis and management? Surv Ophthalmol. 1989; 33(Suppl.):291–300.
- Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, et al. Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 120:699–708.
- Damato BE, Ahmed J, Allan D, et al. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculokinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening? Eye. 1989; 3:727–31.
- Damato BE, Chyla J, McClure E, et al. A hand-held OKP chart for the screening of glaucoma: Preliminary evaluation. Eye. 1990 54: 632–7.
- Damato BE. Oculokinetic perimetry: a simple visual field test for use in the community. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995; 69:927–31.
- Vernon SA, Quigley HA. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyzer. Eye. 1992; 6:521–4.
- Wishart PK. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Eye. 1993; 7:113–21.
- Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP, et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999: 117:1479–84.
- Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency doubling perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 38:413–25
- Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 125:819–29.
- Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M, et al. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129:328–33.
- Ellish NJ, Gerstein C, Higginbotham EJ, et al. Pilot study to evaluate screening methods for detection of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997: 38: S825.
- The Damato dedicated glaucoma screener—user's guide. Precision Vision, 1996.
- Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer and the Goldmann Perimeter. Ophthalmology. 1985 92:77–82.
- Gahlinger PM, Abramson JH. Computer Programs for Epidemiologic Analysis: PEPI Version 2. Stone Mountain, GA: USD Inc., 1995.
- Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33:159–74.